Writers are identified by 3 aspects. These aspects are design, tone, and function. William Byrd and William Bradford were 2 colonial writers however they took entirely opposite approaches towards composing. During these times, journals, journals, and sermons made up the literature. Byrd and Bradford were no exceptions with their works of A History of the Dividing Line and Of Plymouth Plantation respectively. Whether it was the distinction in writing styles, the various functions for composing the stories, or just each writer’s tone, their strategies were far from similar to one another.
One difference in between Bradford and Byrd was their composing styles. Bradford used the plain design to record and to explain his account of the New World. Plain style writing is the kind of composing utilized by the Puritans. This writing style tended to remain away from figures of speech and tried to keep it plain, simple and best to the point. A fantastic example is when the inhabitants first got here and Bradford kept in mind that individuals “had now no good friends to welcome them nor inns to captivate or revitalize their weather-beaten bodies; no houses or much less towns to repair to, to seek for succor” (31 ).
This statement explained how tough it was to show up to such a barren land even after all the hardships assault. Bradford did an excellent job in his works to provide the genuine and accurate accounts of what occurred.
On the other hand, Byrd wrote his understanding of the New World in sharp contrast to the writing style of Bradford.
Byrd used kinds of ridicule to tape his account of what happened in the new colonies. A timeless example of this technique was when Byrd called the abrupt migration of individuals to the New World a “modish frenzy” (50 ). This declaration reveals that Byrd believed it to be simply a modern fad to begin a life in the New World. Byrd composed utilizing his own perception of colonial life and battle, for that reason making it less historically precise than Bradford’s writings. These two styles defined each male and considerably credited to the huge contrast in their composing choice.
One of the three factors that characterized both writers was purpose. A large contrast in the writings of Byrd and Bradford was the purpose for which they were written. The main reason that Bradford wrote his story was to inform the reader about the hardships and struggles of Puritan life in the New
World. He also wrote his story to show God’s hand in their experiences. Many Biblical references to God such as, “but they cried unto the Lord, and He heard their voice and looked on their adversity” (31), were used in his writing for this very reason. This as well as many other religious references showed how much of an impact religion had on the Puritans. Bradford wanted to convey this dependence on and impact of God and religion throughout his writings. Byrd’s writing was more biased and opinionated because he wrote it to amuse the reader.
Read Also: Topics for Compare and Contrast Essay
For example, all throughout his story he constantly made fun of settlers. He mentioned during the story that the settlers “built a church that cost no more than fifty pounds and a tavern that cost five hundred” (52). This little tidbit served no purpose other than to criticize the colonial settlers and had no historical significance whatsoever. He made fun of the settlers to explicate change in the settlers’ way of life. Bradford’s purpose greatly contrasted with that of Byrd.
The last contrast between Byrd and Bradford was their attitude or tone towards the subject they wrote about. In “Of Plymouth Plantation”, Bradford used a serious tone. His tone remained simple and unbiased throughout the story. The fact that he chose to use this tone is because Bradford was a very religious man that closely followed the Puritan way of life. Most of all, he wanted to record the true accounts of what took place without mixing personal thoughts or ideas with fact. On the other hand, Byrd used a very satirical and humorous tone. This satirical tone was conveyed throughout his entire story.
An excellent example of satirical writing was when Byrd explained how colonists were too lazy to plant their own crops, so instead they “were forced to take more pains to seek for wild fruits in the woods than they would have taken in tilling the ground” (52). This quote by Byrd clearly showed his frustration with the colonists very. Byrd’s tone differed from Bradford’s, because Byrd’s story was never meant to be an accurate historical account of colonial times. Byrd possessed different feelings toward matters that took place, and this dramatically changed his tone.
To conclude, writers are never the same. There are many different types of writers all across the world, from ancient to modern times. William Byrd and William Bradford were no exception to this. Their style, tone, and purpose totally changed the outcome of their writings which were based upon similiar incidents in history. People have their own views and beliefs of a certain situation, and more often than not, that view will be different from person to person as clearly shown in comparing Byrd to Bradford.