To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Altruism, a concept deeply rooted in both philosophical and psychological discourse, has sparked prolonged debates regarding its existence. According to Batson et al. (1981), altruism is defined as the motivation arising within an individual to help another in distress, driven by the desire to alleviate the other's suffering. However, a persistent argument challenges the authenticity of true altruism, asserting that every act of kindness harbors an underlying ulterior motive, termed egoism.
Supporters of the egoistic perspective contend that all human actions are inherently directed towards self-benefit.
This does not necessarily imply a tangible gain in return for the altruistic act but suggests that even the act of alleviating personal distress by witnessing another's suffering is inherently egoistic. Cialdini et al.'s (1987) study lends credence to this perspective, proposing that helping someone in distress is a response to relieving personal sadness within the observer, heightened by empathetic feelings towards the sufferer.
In two experiments conducted by Cialdini et al. (1987), the researchers observed that subjects with a high empathy set exhibited elevated helping scores.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Altruism
5 (339)
“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”
However, these scores diminished when subjects were offered a sadness-canceling reward, suggesting that personal sadness motivated the act of helping, rather than a selfless desire to alleviate the sufferer's distress. The Negative State Relief model, proposed in the second experiment, posited that individuals help others as a response to their own egoistic behaviors. Despite high levels of empathy, subjects were less inclined to help when their personal sadness was perceived as fixed, indicating that personal distress, rather than empathic concern, drove their motivation to assist.
On the other hand, the Empathy-Altruism hypothesis proposes that empathy leads to altruistic behavior.
Batson et al. (1981) conducted a study wherein a young woman received electric shocks, and subjects were given the opportunity to help her by taking her place. The results supported the hypothesis that empathy, rather than egoism, prompts altruistic acts. However, an intriguing observation emerged in the second experiment, where subjects were forced to help the sufferer under difficult escape conditions, revealing egoistically motivated behavior. This suggests that, when compelled, individuals may help solely to escape a distressing situation, compromising the altruistic nature of their actions.
Considering the theories and experiments presented, a nuanced perspective emerges. While the egoistic paradigm posits that all human actions are fundamentally self-serving, the Empathy-Altruism hypothesis suggests that genuine altruism can arise from empathetic feelings. However, both perspectives have limitations.
The argument in favor of egoism contends that true altruism cannot exist within the normal parameters of human psychology. Humans are inherently wired to prioritize their survival, engaging in behaviors that promote their well-being and avoiding actions that may cause harm. For altruism to be genuine, one would need to prioritize others' well-being without expecting anything in return. Even seemingly altruistic actions for loved ones may be tainted by the expectation of praise, reward, or heightened self-motivation, revealing an underlying egoistic motivation.
Moreover, the experiments conducted by Cialdini et al. (1987) and Batson et al. (1981) highlight the complex interplay between empathy and altruism. Personal sadness, whether derived from witnessing another's distress or forced empathy, appears to influence the motivation to help. This suggests that the purity of altruistic acts may be compromised by personal emotions and the desire to alleviate one's own distress.
In conclusion, the debate on the existence of true altruism continues to unfold, with evidence supporting both egoistic and altruistic perspectives. The intricacies of human motivation and behavior underscore the challenges in definitively categorizing acts as purely altruistic or egoistic. As we navigate this complex terrain, acknowledging the influence of personal emotions and motivations becomes crucial. Whether altruism is a genuine expression of selflessness or a complex interplay of empathy and personal distress, understanding these dynamics enhances our comprehension of human behavior and the motivations that drive it.
The Complex Nature of Altruism: A Critical Examination. (2016, Sep 19). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/does-true-altruism-exist-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
