To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In the intricate tapestry of human behavior, the term "helping behavior" takes center stage, delving into the motivations behind actions that promote genuine happiness in others. This essay seeks to unravel the complexities surrounding pro-social behavior, investigating the extent to which individuals engage in acts of kindness without expecting anything in return. Furthermore, it delves into the concept of altruism, examining its roots in kin selection, reciprocal altruism, and the empathy-altruism hypothesis. The umbrella term for these behaviors is 'Pro-social Behavior,' which encompasses both altruism and bystander behavior.
The exploration begins with an analysis of pro-social behavior, categorizing it into altruism and bystander behavior. Altruism, a term coined by French philosopher Auguste Comte in 1851, signifies self-sacrifice for the benefit of others. Altruistic acts find their roots in various models, including kin selection, reciprocal altruism, empathy-altruism hypothesis, and the negative-state relief model. Bystander behavior is divided into intervention and apathy, where individuals may choose to help or refrain from offering assistance, respectively (Durkin, 1995; Campbell, 1998; Cardwell and Flanagan, 2004).
An exploration of kin selection, often referred to as the 'selfish gene' view, sheds light on the evolutionary perspective of altruism.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Biotechnology
4.7 (348)
“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”
From a Darwinian viewpoint, the act of reproduction is seen as the transfer of family genes to the next generation. The care and help provided to offspring can be viewed as a form of helpful behavior, with the extent of assistance dependent on the level of shared genes. Research by Cunningham emphasizes the correlation between kinship relationship and the likelihood of freely obtained help among family members (Fletcher and Clark, 2001).
Hamilton's 'Coefficient of relatedness' further highlights the influence of shared genes on the decision to offer help (Hamilton, 1964).
Reciprocal altruism, closely linked to kin selection, extends the scope of altruistic acts beyond familial ties. Research by Robert Trivers in the 1970s introduced the concept, emphasizing a mutual exchange of help akin to the 'I'll scratch your back, if you scratch mine' principle. This form of altruism relies on four key factors: cost, benefit, future assistance, and social links between individuals (Campbell, 1998). Rothstein argues for the interlink ability between reciprocal altruism and kin selection, suggesting a genetic similarity among reciprocal altruists (Rothstein, 1980).
In 1991, Batson introduced the empathy-altruism hypothesis, offering a social-psychological answer to the altruism question. This perspective posits that witnessing another person in need generates emotional sensations, including empathy and distress. Batson argues that the motivations for offering help differ based on the situation: distress leads to egoistic motivations, while empathy creates an altruistic stimulus (Fletcher and Clark, 2001). According to Batson, the vision of a person in need elicits a variety of emotional responses, leading to a genuine desire to offer assistance (Hewstone and Stroebe, 2001).
Delving deeper into the evolutionary perspectives of pro-social behavior, it becomes evident that the dance of genes plays a crucial role in shaping altruistic tendencies. The 'selfish gene' theory, rooted in kin selection, posits that individuals are driven to help close relatives to ensure the propagation of shared genetic material. This perspective aligns with the Darwinian concept of reproduction as the transfer of family genes to the next generation, solidifying the link between genetics and altruistic actions (Hewstone and Stroebe, 2001). Cunningham's research in the Humboldt Journal of Social Relations in 1985/1986 reinforces this idea, revealing that higher kinship relationships increase the likelihood of freely obtained help among family members (Fletcher and Clark, 2001).
Hamilton's introduction of the 'Coefficient of relatedness' in 1964 adds another layer to the genetic tapestry of altruism. This coefficient quantifies the degree of shared genes between two individuals, influencing the decision to offer help and the level of assistance provided. As individuals navigate the landscape of pro-social behavior, the genetic ties become intricate threads weaving through the fabric of altruistic connections. The higher the degree of shared genes, the stronger the impulse to extend help, creating a web of familial bonds interwoven with altruistic tendencies (Hamilton, 1964; Fletcher and Clark, 2001).
Building bridges beyond the realm of kinship, reciprocal altruism emerges as a dynamic force shaping pro-social behavior. Research by Robert Trivers in the 1970s introduces the idea that altruistic acts are not confined to family but extend to friends and even strangers. The 'I'll scratch your back, if you scratch mine' principle forms the foundation of reciprocal altruism, where acts of kindness are willingly rendered with the expectation of future reciprocation. Four key factors—cost, benefit, future assistance, and social links—play pivotal roles in ensuring the smooth functioning of this form of altruism (Campbell, 1998).
The symphony of reciprocity plays out as individuals engage in reciprocal altruism. The cost, whether measured in time or effort, influences the likelihood of help being offered. When the cost is perceived as low, individuals are more inclined to extend assistance. The benefit, both immediate and future, becomes a crucial note in this symphony, as individuals weigh the advantages of helping against potential gains. The anticipation of needing assistance in the future adds depth to the altruistic melody, creating a harmonious exchange of support (Campbell, 1998).
In the intricate fabric of reciprocal altruism, the shared threads of genetic similarity among altruists become apparent. Rothstein argues for the interlink ability between reciprocal altruism and kin selection, suggesting that individuals naturally gravitate towards supporting others who exhibit similar altruistic tendencies. This genetic kinship, observed through behavioral patterns, highlights the possibility of an underlying genetic connection among reciprocal altruists. As individuals engage in acts of kindness, the invisible threads of genetic similarity weave a narrative of shared altruistic tendencies (Rothstein, 1980).
Batson's empathy-altruism hypothesis adds a nuanced layer to the exploration of pro-social behavior. Published in 1991, Batson's work presents an empathy-based perspective on altruism. The hypothesis suggests that when individuals witness someone in need, the experience elicits a range of emotional sensations, including empathy and distress. The vision of another person in a vulnerable state prompts individuals to imagine themselves in a similar position, fostering a feeling of compassion. In this empathic state, the inclination to provide help or assistance arises as a means to alleviate the empathic concern and distress (Hewstone and Stroebe, 2001).
According to Batson's empathy-altruism hypothesis, the emotional canvas of distress and empathy paints the motivations for altruistic acts. When confronted with distress, individuals may be motivated by egoistic reasons, seeking to alleviate their own discomfort. In contrast, empathy creates an altruistic stimulus, where the desire to help is driven by a genuine concern for the well-being of others. The interplay between distress and empathy shapes the motivations behind pro-social behavior, revealing the multifaceted nature of human compassion (Fletcher and Clark, 2001).
In conclusion, the exploration of pro-social behavior provides a comprehensive view of the intricate threads that weave through the fabric of human connection. From the evolutionary perspectives of kin selection and reciprocal altruism to the empathic nuances of the empathy-altruism hypothesis, individuals navigate a complex web of emotions and genetic ties when extending help. The intricate dance of genes, the coefficient of relatedness, and the symphony of reciprocity all contribute to the rich tapestry of pro-social behavior. As we unravel the threads of human connection, it becomes clear that the language of altruism is woven into the very fabric of our culture, shaping the interactions that define our shared humanity.
An Analysis of Altruism and Bystander Behavior. (2020, Jun 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/selfless-act-4599-new-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
