To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Martin Gansberg's article, "Thirty-eight who saw murder and didn't call the police," delves into a singular, disturbing event that raises questions about human indifference and the bystander effect. While this incident may seem isolated, it prompts reflection on societal attitudes and the psychological factors that can contribute to such inaction. This essay seeks to explore the complexities surrounding bystander behavior, analyzing the contextual factors that may influence individuals to refrain from intervention, and the ethical considerations involved in journalistic storytelling.
Gansberg's narrative implies a shocking apathy among 38 witnesses who observed a woman being stalked and stabbed over the course of half an hour.
While it may be tempting to dismiss this as an isolated incident, the bystander effect, wherein individuals are less likely to offer assistance in the presence of others, is a well-documented phenomenon. Urban settings, characterized by bustling crowds and a fast-paced lifestyle, often amplify the bystander effect, as individuals may feel a diffusion of responsibility within a large group.
Living in metropolitan areas, people may find themselves overwhelmed by the sheer volume of activity around them, hindering their ability to process and respond to emergencies.
This urban anonymity can lead to a sense of detachment, where individuals prioritize their personal safety and avoid involvement in potentially risky situations. The psychological distance from the victim becomes a barrier to empathy and action, contributing to the observed lack of intervention in Gansberg's account.
The prevalence of crime and violence in media, including television, internet, and movies, plays a significant role in shaping public perception and responses to real-life incidents.
Gansberg touches upon the desensitization caused by constant exposure to violent content. The portrayal of crime as entertainment can desensitize individuals, blurring the line between fiction and reality. Consequently, some may view a violent event as a spectacle rather than a call to action.
This desensitization poses a challenge in fostering a sense of responsibility and urgency among witnesses. The media's influence on societal attitudes underscores the need for thoughtful reflection on the ethical implications of sensationalized reporting. Journalists must navigate the fine line between capturing the gravity of an event and potentially perpetuating the desensitization that contributes to bystander inaction.
The opening line of Gansberg's article utilizes a degree of exaggeration to emphasize the gravity of the witnessed events. While such literary devices can evoke a powerful emotional response, they also raise ethical considerations in journalistic storytelling. The responsibility of journalists to provide accurate information is paramount, and any distortion must be carefully weighed against the imperative to convey the essence and urgency of the situation.
It is essential to discern between distortion that enhances the narrative's impact and manipulation that compromises the truth. While Gansberg's exaggeration serves a rhetorical purpose, it is crucial for journalists to uphold a commitment to accuracy and transparency. Balancing the need for compelling storytelling with ethical standards is an ongoing challenge in journalism, requiring a delicate calibration of narrative intent and journalistic responsibility.
In conclusion, Martin Gansberg's article opens a window into the complexities of human behavior, emphasizing the bystander effect and its manifestation in urban settings. The influence of media on societal attitudes adds another layer to the challenges of fostering a sense of responsibility among witnesses. Additionally, ethical considerations in journalism underscore the delicate balance between narrative impact and the obligation to truthfully represent events. As society grapples with these complexities, it becomes imperative to cultivate a collective awareness that transcends apathy, fostering a culture of empathy and intervention.
The Bystander Effect: Examining Martin Gansberg's Article. (2016, Nov 14). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/martin-gansberg-thirty-eight-who-saw-murder-and-didnt-call-the-police-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
