To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In the insightful discourse presented by Pharinet in her 2007 blog post, the question of whether everyone should pursue a college education is explored with a nuanced perspective. The modern landscape of higher education is fraught with controversy, prompting Pharinet to employ various rhetorical strategies to articulate her position effectively. This essay delves into the strategic use of a calm tone, incorporation of personal examples, acknowledgment of opposing views, and provides an in-depth analysis of the broader implications surrounding the question of universal college attendance.
Pharinet strategically employs a calm and passive tone to engage the reader and convey her arguments in a reasonable manner.
The author makes straightforward statements, such as "not every person should attend college," backed by compelling facts indicating that approximately 50% of college students fail to graduate due to overwhelming financial and academic burdens (Pharinet 635).
This measured tone facilitates a non-confrontational dialogue, allowing Pharinet to pose critical questions without alienating her audience: "If college is for everyone, why do we rely on SAT scores and high school transcripts? Why doesn't every school have an open admissions policy?" (Pharinet 635).
Verified writer
Proficient in: Education
4.9 (984)
“ Ok, let me say I’m extremely satisfy with the result while it was a last minute thing. I really enjoy the effort put in. ”
She subsequently answers these questions, asserting that the universality of college attendance is not practical, citing instances of pre-college students struggling with basic academic skills and varying expectations in high schools (Pharinet 636).
Pharinet's ability to present stark facts without aggression enhances the overall effectiveness of her argument, fostering a receptive atmosphere for readers to consider the intricacies of the debate. Moreover, the calm tone promotes an open-minded exploration of the topic, encouraging readers to reflect on the broader implications of universal college attendance.
Another compelling aspect of Pharinet's argument is her adept use of personal examples to bolster her credibility and establish a tangible connection with the reader.
In recounting a student's casual remark, "C's get degrees," Pharinet sheds light on the prevailing mentality among college students, emphasizing a lack of genuine interest in learning (Pharinet 636).
This personal anecdote transforms Pharinet from a distant author into a relatable figure. Readers gain insights into her role as an educator, cultivating a deeper understanding of her personal connection to the education debate. Pharinet's disclosure of her teaching profession enhances her credibility, as she emerges as a knowledgeable and personally invested participant in the discourse on education.
The inclusion of personal experiences not only humanizes the author but also fortifies the persuasive impact of her argument by grounding it in real-world scenarios, making the issue more accessible and relevant to the reader. By expanding on additional personal examples, Pharinet reinforces her points, elucidating the complex interplay between students, educators, and the educational system.
Pharinet skillfully navigates the complex terrain of the education debate by acknowledging and addressing opposing views. From the outset, she concedes the importance of education, stating, "There is no doubt that education is important. There is also no doubt that every person has the right to an education. However..." (Pharinet 635).
This nuanced approach demonstrates Pharinet's awareness of the multifaceted nature of the issue. She goes further by proposing alternatives, such as suggesting that some students take a gap year for self-reflection and financial stability before embarking on their college journey (Pharinet 636). By doing so, Pharinet illustrates her commitment to constructive dialogue, offering practical solutions rather than merely critiquing the status quo.
These nods to the opposition showcase Pharinet's genuine concern for the well-being of students and the education system, reinforcing her position as an advocate for thoughtful reform rather than a mere critic. The inclusion of alternative perspectives adds depth to her argument, inviting readers to contemplate a more comprehensive view of higher education. Further exploration of potential alternatives, coupled with empirical evidence, enhances the richness of the discussion and encourages readers to critically evaluate the existing paradigms of college education.
As we delve deeper into the discourse initiated by Pharinet, it becomes imperative to consider the broader implications surrounding the question of universal college attendance. The issues raised by the author extend beyond academic realms, touching upon societal, economic, and individual aspects.
From a societal perspective, the question of whether everyone should attend college prompts reflection on the role of education in shaping communities. It encourages us to assess the potential impact of a more selective approach to higher education on social dynamics, diversity, and collective progress. Moreover, Pharinet's arguments beckon us to contemplate the economic ramifications of universal college attendance, exploring potential consequences on job markets, income distribution, and the overall stability of the workforce.
Individually, the discussion instigated by Pharinet compels us to reflect on the diverse needs and aspirations of students. It prompts consideration of alternative educational paths, the value of vocational training, and the importance of tailored approaches to accommodate the unique talents and inclinations of individuals. By expanding our analysis to encompass these broader implications, we gain a more holistic understanding of the challenges and opportunities associated with reshaping the landscape of higher education.
In conclusion, Pharinet's exploration of the question, "Is college for everyone?" transcends a mere analysis of the educational landscape. Through the strategic use of a calm tone, incorporation of personal examples, acknowledgment of opposing views, and an in-depth examination of broader implications, Pharinet constructs a compelling argument that challenges conventional wisdom. Her ability to present facts without aggression, share personal experiences, and foster constructive dialogue contributes to the overall efficacy of her message. As we grapple with the evolving nature of higher education, Pharinet's nuanced approach provides valuable insights and prompts a thoughtful reconsideration of the role of college in contemporary society.
Reimagining Higher Education: A Comprehensive Analysis. (2016, May 25). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/rhetorical-analysis-of-an-article-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
