Conflict Between Religion and Science

The world isn't always black and white, it's a million shades of grey, each hue defined relative to another. The human race in itself is a good example of it. We are all different and have our own opinions, thoughts and views of the world. This large spectrum of ideas cannot be judged as purely right or wrong. For some, things may be right, while for the others, they just aren't. Which among those opinions is the truth is then a matter of perspective.

Understanding and accepting the intentions behind beliefs and opinions of others is needed otherwise it isn't possible for such a diverse race to coexist in peace with its own kind. Yet, we struggle with it. We chain ourselves down to our differences. It's no wonder then that things are said to move towards chaos rather than peace if efforts are not taken to change it. One such example which has been creating conflicts between two groups of people for centuries and has persisted even unto the modern day is between facts and beliefs, that is, science and religion.

Get quality help now

RhizMan

Verified writer

Proficient in: Conflict

4.9 (247)

“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Though we have progressed enough to not witness riots in our daily life and be able to practice both and coexist, there still lies a hint of hostility which needs to be eradicated.

Some scientists don't believe in the existence of God and yet they believe in our understanding of the structure of an atom, when it too is completely out of our visible sight, our belief of its existence stemming only from the conclusions made on the basis of observations and experiments.

We even live on the chance or the probability of knowing the position of its electrons. It's like saying we don't know exactly where but we do know that it exists. Isn't that the same as believing in God? Albert Einstein once proclaimed, 'There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle.' Even the gift of life itself is thought of as the manifestation of God. Yet, even this isn't enough to convince people of God's presence.

When the question of the beginning of the universe comes into being, the theist leaves it in the hands of God while scientists are determined to explain it. That's all well and good but why is it that when everything is created from or of another, the universe itself came into being completely by itself, that is, it had no constituent actions which lead to its creation. Genesis. How different is it then from the belief that the common being holds of the universe being created by God? Maybe it is turtles all the way down[Hawking, Stephen (1988)] Nature, thought to be a creation of God, has been proved time and again to not be confined to the boxes that we try to categorise it into. We have tried to classify things which wouldn't be factionalised.

An example of this would be how through years of painstakingly crafting the five-kingdom classification, the Platypus was discovered which resisted being labelled as a mammal, confusing biologists with its reptilian and bird-like features. Or, how even light keeps baffling scientists by being a wave and a particle sometimes both, at the same time! Some say that it's the soul which makes an entity into a living while others call it energy. But what is this energy? If it is known to exist all around us then why is it that organisms die without it? Why can't a simple energy transfer be enough to revive them? And after seeking the right medical assistance, why, when even that fails, do the doctors themselves tell us that it now lies in the hands of the Almighty? Religion is nothing but dharma, and dharma means the right way of living. It's devised for the benefit of people to live a life without conflicts, that is, to allow everyone to coexist in harmony. On the other hand, science bridges the gap between what we understand and what we don't. It attempts to explain the unknown through the known with the futile hope of understanding the truth. It tries to solve the puzzle of our existence without having all the pieces. Isn't that the beauty of it?

In order to be able to explain our daily observations, we need science. While belief in God provides people hope and a source of faith. It gives them the solace of knowing that they are not alone and encourages them to live a loving and peaceful life. Science refuses to trust without tests of verification. While God demands absolute faith which is then verified through tests (that are in the form of challenges in our life). Religion was the invention of man and science is a constant discovery (then again, who's to say that God too won't be a discovery?) And yet, the path that appeals to us is ours to choose.

The conflict arises due to lack of acceptance. What we fail to understand is that both of them, science and the belief in God have arisen due to the natural inclination of human beings towards them. To question and ask for proof and to look for solace and a source to stem our faith on is our human nature. Science requires an innate sense of curiosity. Curiosity is the thirst for knowledge and is the rightful reason we ask for an explanation. Lack of trust or ignorance is the other major reason which makes us challenge the explanation provided. While the former is beneficial, the latter is a toxic habit that may lead to our harm. The pursuit of science in the name of peace, progress and knowledge can be called the right way of going about it. In other words, the dharma of science is curiosity and so it is of humanity. Science should not be restricted to our beliefs, though, it can be influenced by it.

Religion dictates a code of conduct to be followed to become the ideal human being. The interpretation of it is at a risk of being changed since its essence was long forgotten. Its ancient knowledge has been exploited and the morale of it, long left behind. At this point in time, a careful understanding of the ancient texts must be undertaken to ensure the recovery of their sacred souls. Keeping all of this in mind, we can conclude that earlier, the conflict was between science and religion. Today, the times have changed and so have people's mindsets. Now, the conflict lies not only in the hostility among these two groups but majorly, inside individuals themselves.

While we are raised today with an equal influence of both, science and spirituality, there was once a time when people only had the binary choice of choosing one over the other. This has made the surface seem calm while deep inside our minds, a tempest rages on. From a third perspective, it is a sign of evolution of humankind and although the times are turbulent, we can be sure that, this time too, we'll rise out of it, stronger than ever.