To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The seventeenth and eighteenth centuries marked a pivotal era in the evolution of political structures, witnessing the coexistence of two distinct forms of government: democracy and absolutism. While both systems demonstrated their effectiveness, the dominance of absolutism emerged as a prevailing force during this transformative period. Absolutism, characterized by the concentration of unlimited power in the hands of a single ruler, played a crucial role in shaping the political landscape of Europe. Philosophical perspectives, such as those of Machiavelli, King James I, and King Louis XIV, championed the efficacy of absolutism, emphasizing its ability to ensure stability, order, and the interests of the state.
Machiavelli, a renowned political philosopher, articulated his views on governance in "The Prince," advocating for rule through fear.
His assertion that "Men have less hesitation in offending a man who is loved than one who is feared" encapsulates the essence of absolutism, where the ruler's authority is grounded in fear, fostering obedience and minimizing defiance.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Democracy
4.7 (346)
“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”
King James I, a proponent of divine right, believed in the inherent authority of kings, asserting that "kings are not only God's lieutenants upon earth" but also sit on God's throne.
Divine right, as articulated by King James I, reinforced the idea that monarchs derive their legitimacy directly from God, elevating their status to a near-divine level. This belief system solidified the monarch's position as the ultimate authority, with no need to justify or question their rule. King Louis XIV, another staunch supporter of absolutism, emphasized the head's prerogative to deliberate and decide, highlighting the efficiency and organization that a centralized authority could bring to the governance of a state.
King Louis XIV famously stated, "The interest of the state must come first," underscoring the prioritization of the state's well-being over individual interests.
Absolutism, in his view, ensured a more streamlined and organized administration, reducing the potential for chaos and dissent within the country.
While absolutism asserted its dominance, certain philosophers, notably Voltaire and John Locke, championed democratic ideals. Voltaire, a proponent of free speech, argued for a government in which all individuals were equally protected by laws. His famous quote, "I may disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it," encapsulates his belief in the fundamental importance of freedom of speech.
However, the challenge of implementing such democratic ideals in a society marked by limited intellectual development and diverse perspectives posed significant obstacles. Voltaire's vision, while appealing in theory, could potentially lead to chaos and instability in a society where the majority lacked the intellectual maturity to engage in reasoned discourse.
John Locke, in his "Two Treatises on Government," advocated for democracy by asserting that individuals could not be subjected to political power without their consent. However, the practical implications of such a system were questioned, as the potential for constant revolts and conflicts over minor issues could hinder effective governance.
Baron de Montesquieu, in "The Spirit of Laws," offered a nuanced perspective, suggesting that the separation of powers was essential for preserving liberty. While this idea held merit, the practicality of such a system in ensuring efficiency and decisive action was subject to scrutiny.
Despite the allure of democratic ideals, absolutism emerged as the most effective form of government during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries in Europe. Absolutism provided prompt solutions to problems, ensuring faster decision-making processes. Its centralized nature allowed for a more efficient administration, minimizing bureaucratic hurdles and facilitating swift action.
Absolutism's emphasis on the interests of the state over individual desires contributed to effective governance. The singular authority of an absolute monarch ensured that decisions were made with the state's well-being in mind, preventing internal conflicts and prioritizing stability. While democracy had its advocates, the prevailing conditions of the time favored absolutism as a pragmatic and efficient choice for ensuring order and effective governance.
In conclusion, the debate between absolutism and democracy during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries reflected the complex dynamics of governance. While democracy had its philosophical champions, the prevailing conditions of limited intellectual development and societal complexities favored absolutism as the most effective and pragmatic form of government. Absolutism's ability to maintain order, reduce dissent, and prioritize the interests of the state positioned it as the pinnacle of governance in Europe during this transformative historical period.
Absolutism vs. Democracy: Governance in the 17th and 18th Centuries. (2016, Aug 20). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/absolutism-and-democracy-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
