To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The 17th century in England stands as a dynamic period marked by a profound transformation in its political landscape. Emerging from a history dominated by hereditary monarchs and absolutism, the century witnessed a seismic shift towards the establishment of constitutionalism. This transformation was not merely a response to the arbitrary rule of absolutist monarchs but was intricately linked to the complex interplay between the monarchy and Parliament. The reigns of James I and Charles I of the Stuart monarchy played a pivotal role in shaping this evolution, setting the stage for conflicts, revolutions, and, ultimately, the emergence of a constitutional monarchy.
The early 17th century commenced with James I ascending to the English throne, inheriting a legacy of monarchs unaccustomed to sharing power with Parliament.
His Scottish heritage added a layer of complexity, as he attempted to bridge the gap between England and Scotland, facing resistance from a Parliament unaccustomed to such financial associations. The outbreak of the Thirty Years War in 1618 further strained relations, exposing the inadequacies of the "Addled Parliament." James I's lack of experience in navigating the intricacies of parliamentary governance set the stage for his successor, Charles I, to grapple with more profound challenges.
One of the defining features of James I's reign was his attempt at financial consolidation between England and Scotland.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Constitution
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
His efforts were met with staunch opposition, particularly in Parliament, which viewed such attempts as a breach of their established authority. The subsequent conflicts and tensions laid the groundwork for the deeper struggles that would unfold in the coming years, pushing England further towards the brink of constitutional crisis.
As the torch passed from James I to Charles I, the challenges intensified.
Charles's marriage to Henrietta Maria, a Catholic, fueled suspicions regarding his religious inclinations. This marriage, coupled with his attempts to impose the Anglican Book of Common Prayer, created a perfect storm of discontent, particularly among the Puritans. The Petition of Right in 1628 was a momentary check on the king's power, highlighting the need for parliamentary consent in taxation and curbing arbitrary actions. However, Charles I, driven by his belief in divine right, eventually abandoned this agreement and embarked on eleven years of personal rule.
During his personal rule, Charles I resorted to unconventional taxation methods, such as ship money and the Act of Revocation in 1625. The latter aimed to revoke all land gifted to the nobility from the church or royal family since 1540, subjecting continued ownership to an annual rent. These measures were symptomatic of Charles I's desperate attempts to govern without the support and approval of Parliament, leading England into a period of deepening financial and political crises. The Long Parliament's emergence in 1640 marked a critical juncture, demanding accountability and setting the stage for the tumultuous events that followed.
The intensifying conflicts between Charles I and Parliament reached a boiling point with the outbreak of the English Civil War. Parliament's success in the initial phase of the war was significantly attributed to Oliver Cromwell's New Model Army, a force driven by radical Puritans and Independents who fervently believed they were fighting for a divine cause. The capture and subsequent execution of Charles I in 1649 marked a seismic shift, not only ending his absolutist aspirations but also heralding the ascendancy of Parliament.
The English Civil War, a culmination of tensions that had simmered for years, showcased the strength of parliamentary forces against the backdrop of royalist aspirations. Oliver Cromwell emerged as a central figure during this phase, his New Model Army proving instrumental in tipping the scales in favor of Parliament. The execution of Charles I, blinded by his unwavering belief in divine right, was a momentous event that shook the foundations of absolutism and set the stage for a redefined political order.
Following the execution of Charles I, Oliver Cromwell grappled with the complexities of governing without the support of Parliament. Despite his initial efforts to eliminate the institution, Cromwell faced challenges in maintaining stability and effective governance. The dissolution of Parliament reflected the inherent difficulties in ruling without an established system of checks and balances. The subsequent period, known as the Restoration, saw the return of Charles II to power in 1660, marking a shift in the political landscape once again.
The "Cavalier" Parliament convened during this period, reflecting the resurgence of royalist sentiments. It dissolved the Puritan army, restored the authority of the Anglican Church through the Clarendon Code, and enforced conformity to the Book of Common Prayer. Charles II, despite permitting the Clarendon Code, displayed a leaning towards religious tolerance. In 1672, he declared the Act of Indulgence, suspending all laws against Catholics. However, Parliament responded with the Test Act, limiting military and civil offices to members of the Anglican Church. Charles II's reliance on French financing strained relations with Parliament, revealing the persistent power struggles between the monarchy and the parliamentary institution.
The succession of James II to the throne heightened concerns about the reemergence of Catholicism as a dominant force in English politics. James's attempts to favor Catholicism, as evident in the Declaration of Indulgence, directly contradicted the provisions of the Test Act. The outrage intensified when James's second wife, a staunch Catholic, became pregnant, leading to a rupture between the monarchy and Parliament. In a moment of historic significance, members of Parliament invited William of Orange, the husband of James's Protestant daughter Mary, to invade England and assume the throne. The stage was set for the Glorious Revolution of 1689, a watershed moment that would redefine the relationship between the monarchy and Parliament.
The Glorious Revolution saw William and Mary offered the throne by Parliament, an offer they accepted with the signing of the Bill of Rights. This constitutional document, ratified in 1689, played a decisive role in eliminating absolutism in England. It granted essential rights to the people, including the right to petition, bear arms, and the right to trial by a jury. More importantly, the Bill of Rights established a government founded on the rule of law, rejecting the notion of divine right and emphasizing that no one, not even the king, was above the law. This marked a monumental shift in England's political landscape, laying the foundation for a robust constitutional monarchy.
The 17th century in England, a tumultuous period of shifting power dynamics, emerged as a pivotal chapter in the evolution of constitutional governance. The struggles between monarchs and Parliament, particularly during the reigns of James I, Charles I, and the subsequent challenges faced by Cromwell, culminated in the triumph of parliamentary forces during the English Civil War. The execution of Charles I underscored the limitations of absolutism and paved the way for Cromwell's rule, which, despite its challenges, highlighted the difficulties in ruling without the established checks and balances provided by Parliament.
The Restoration brought Charles II back to the throne, but the conflicts between royalist sentiments and parliamentary authority persisted. The reign of James II intensified these tensions, culminating in the Glorious Revolution and the enactment of the Bill of Rights. This transformative document eliminated absolutism, granted fundamental rights to the people, and established a government grounded in the rule of law. The 17th century in England serves as a poignant reminder of the consequences of unchecked absolutism and the enduring triumph of constitutionalism, a legacy that continues to shape the nation's political identity.
The intricate dance between monarchs and Parliament, fueled by religious, financial, and political considerations, shaped a narrative of resilience and evolution. The 17th century's constitutional journey reflects not only the struggles of the past but also the enduring lessons that continue to influence contemporary notions of governance and power distribution.
Constitutional Evolution in 17th Century England. (2016, Mar 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/constitutionalism-in-england-in-the-17th-century-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
