To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, signed on February 2, 1848, marks a pivotal moment in the history of the United States and Mexico. Culminating the U.S.-Mexican War, this treaty not only concluded a military conflict but laid the groundwork for enduring political, territorial, and diplomatic consequences. Delving into the intricacies of the treaty reveals a nuanced narrative of negotiations, political dissent, and the far-reaching implications that resonated far beyond the signing date.
As the U.S.-Mexican War unfolded, the leaders of the United States adopted a posture of perceived moral superiority during the treaty negotiations.
This stance, rooted in the concept of Manifest Destiny, asserted that the incorporation of nearly half of Mexico's national territory into the United States was a providential event. Their mission, as they saw it, was to spread the tenets of U.S. democracy across the continent.
Due to its military triumph, the United States assumed a dominant role in shaping the terms of settlement.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Government
4.7 (346)
“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”
This dominance established a lasting pattern of political and military inequality between the two nations, a dynamic that has persisted in Mexican-U.S. relations over the years. The signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo marked not the end but the inception of a complex process. The treaty required approval from the congresses of both the United States and Mexico, introducing a new layer of uncertainty into the equation.
Opposition to the treaty manifested in both countries. In the United States, northern abolitionists were vocal in their resistance to the annexation of Mexican territory.
Meanwhile, in the Mexican congress, a substantial minority advocated for continuing the fight rather than acquiescing to the terms outlined in the treaty. Despite these challenges, both nations ultimately ratified the document, cementing the conclusion of the war and initiating a protracted U.S. political discourse on slavery in the newly acquired territories, along with persistent border disputes with Mexico.
Examining the treaty's content sheds light on the significant territorial alterations and legal ramifications that unfolded. In Article V of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexico ceded Upper California and New Mexico, encompassing present-day Arizona and New Mexico, as well as portions of Utah, Nevada, and Colorado. Simultaneously, Mexico relinquished all claims to Texas and acknowledged the Rio Grande as the southern boundary with the United States—a departure from Mexico's previous assertion that the Nueces River defined the border.
Article VIII introduced a crucial provision requiring residents in the acquired territories to make a consequential decision. They could opt to remain in the territory now under United States control or relocate to Mexico. Notably, those who chose to leave could retain their land. This decision-making process came with a one-year timeframe; failure to make a choice within the stipulated period resulted in automatic citizenship in the United States. Additionally, residents had to weigh the decision of becoming U.S. citizens or retaining their Mexican nationality, further complicating the landscape of identity and allegiance.
Article IX delineated the rights of Mexicans who chose to become U.S. citizens. These individuals were granted the same rights as U.S. citizens, including religious freedom, property ownership, and overall liberty. Meanwhile, Article X, although a legal document before its omission by the U.S. Senate, underscored the U.S. commitment to honoring land grants made by the Mexican Government in the acquired territories. This provision served as a protective measure for Mexicans seeking to own land in a region governed by the United States but originally belonging to Mexico.
On May 30, 1848, during the exchange of ratifications for the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, the two nations negotiated a three-article protocol in Santiago de Queretaro to elucidate amendments. The first article affirmed that the original Article IX, though replaced by Article III of the Treaty of Louisiana, would continue to confer the rights specified in Article IX. The second article confirmed the legitimacy of land grants in accordance with Mexican law.
Crucially, this protocol provided a nuanced framework to address the evolving legal landscape in the acquired territories. However, the U.S. later chose to disregard the protocol, arguing that its representatives had exceeded their authority in accepting it. This decision underscored the complex and sometimes contentious nature of post-treaty relations between the United States and Mexico.
The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, while officially ending a war, set in motion a cascade of consequences that continue to shape the histories of both Mexico and the United States. The territorial shifts, legal provisions, and diplomatic intricacies embedded in the treaty laid the foundation for enduring political dynamics and ongoing debates over identity, citizenship, and land ownership. As we reflect on this historical juncture, it becomes evident that the repercussions of the treaty extend far beyond its signing date, leaving an indelible imprint on the collective narratives of two nations.
The Guadalupe Hidalgo Treaty: Shaping Nations, Echoing Legacies. (2020, Jun 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/treaty-of-guadalupe-hidalgo-us-mexican-war-history-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
