To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Understanding the concept of personal identity is akin to unraveling a complex puzzle, with layers intertwined through physical presence, life experiences, memories, and mental self-awareness. Defining what makes us the same person over the course of time poses a profound philosophical challenge. In this expansive exploration, we will delve into the intricacies of personal identity, arguing for the "simple" view while critically examining and refuting complex theories rooted in the body, brain, and psychological continuity criterion. Through an in-depth analysis, we aim to shed light on the elusive nature of personal identity, expanding the discourse to a comprehensive 1600 words.
The "simple" view posits that personal identity and its persistence elude measurement through both philosophical discourse and scientific investigation.
This perspective challenges complex theories that advocate for the determinative role of the body, brain, or psychological continuity in shaping identity over time (Garrett, 1998, p 52).
Complex theories, encapsulated within arguments surrounding the body, brain, and psychological continuity, suggest a more nuanced understanding of personal identity.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Consciousness
4.7 (348)
“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”
However, these theories face considerable scrutiny, as we shall explore in the subsequent sections.
The first complex argument delves into psychological continuity, a concept championed by John Locke. Locke defines a person as a 'thinking, intelligent being, that has reason and reflection and can consider itself as itself, the same thinking thing, in different times and places' (Locke, 1689, p 1-6). According to this theory, psychological continuity is crucial for an individual to persist over time, implying that a person's mental state must be descended from their previous mental states to maintain identity.
However, a critical examination reveals a fundamental flaw in this perspective.
Instances such as cognitive impairments, traumatic experiences, and post-traumatic stress disorder challenge the notion of continuous mental states. Individuals undergoing drastic mental changes cannot be deemed the same person, introducing the concept of a "snap" or "break" that transforms them into effectively new entities (Waller, 2011, p 198-210).
This critique raises questions about the adequacy of psychological continuity as a determinant of personal identity, prompting a deeper exploration into the nature of mental states and their role in defining who we are over time.
The body criterion, another facet of complex theories, posits that personal identity persists if an individual inhabits the same physical body over time. This seemingly straightforward concept, however, faces challenges when subjected to thought experiments.
Consider scenarios where organ transplantation occurs or bodies are cloned. It becomes evident that personal identity extends beyond the physical body, challenging the adequacy of this criterion in defining the essence of an individual. If individual A receives an organ donation from individual B, can it be said that individual A has taken on some of B's identity? Such thought experiments compel us to reconsider the simplistic correlation between physical body and identity (Korfmacher, 2006).
This critique propels us into a deeper examination of the relationship between body and identity, urging us to explore the nuanced interplay between physicality and the complex nature of personal identity.
The third complex argument centers on the persistence of the brain as the epicenter of personal identity. The brain, functioning as the repository of memories, thoughts, and self-awareness, is often considered the "home" of identity. However, this perspective blurs the line between consciousness and the physical brain.
Proponents of the "we are our brains" theory argue that, as long as the brain endures, so does the person. Yet, this reductionist viewpoint raises critical questions. If consciousness is the crux of identity, could an individual persist as a mere brain in a jar? Julian Baggini's analogy comparing consciousness to a musical score written on paper prompts us to distinguish between consciousness and the physical brain (Baggini, 2005, pp. 112-114).
This line of inquiry challenges us to consider whether consciousness alone can sustain personal identity or if life experiences and interactions are intrinsic components that cannot be overlooked.
To label the "simple" view of the persistence of personal identity as "simple" is a deceptive oversimplification. Deep consideration on the subject turns towards the intricate complexities that define who we are. While the categories of body, brain, and mental state may initially seem intuitively relevant, they fall short of encapsulating the true essence of personal identity.
Personal identity is an elusive and ever-changing construct that defies easy categorization. Its persistence is more than the sum of body, brain, or mental state; it is an intricate interplay of these elements and more. The enigma of personal identity invites ongoing philosophical exploration, urging us to contemplate the multifaceted nature of what makes us the same person over time.
The Enigma of Personal Identity: A Comprehensive Philosophical Examination. (2016, Dec 28). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/personal-identity-philosophy-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
