To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In the year 2008, over 341,000 animals were subjected to research, testing, and teaching purposes in New Zealand alone. The ethical quandary surrounding animal testing has gained substantial attention, as it involves the use of creatures from various corners of the world to test a myriad of products, ranging from pharmaceuticals to everyday commodities like shampoo. Remarkably, nearly every medication or treatment that individuals have ever utilized has undergone testing on innocent animals, ostensibly for the greater good.
Each year, millions of animals endure agonizing tests to ascertain the "safety" of cosmetics and household items.
From eye shadow to oven cleaner, substances are tested on rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals, despite the arguable lack of relevance to preventing or treating human illness or injury. These animals spend their lives in austere cages, devoid of choices or the ability to express natural behaviors. Many never experience the simple pleasures of fresh air or sunlight, confined only by bars and concrete walls.
Facilities that do offer outdoor caging typically provide limited and infrequent access to the outdoors. Standard laboratory conditions, characterized by small, crowded cages, absence of enrichment, loud noises, and artificial lighting, induce stress in animals, manifested through physical symptoms.
A startling revelation is the extensive list of companies involved in animal testing, including unexpected names such as the Mars Candy Company. Recognizable brands like CoverGirl, Dove, Garnier, Lancôme, Listerine, Maybelline, Pantene, Vaseline, and Lipton all share a commonality—they subject innocent animals to testing.
This information underscores the prevalence of this practice in industries that produce everyday consumer goods.
Within the context of our personal lives, many of us share our homes with beloved pets. As a pet owner myself, with two cherished cats, the thought of them undergoing the horrors of testing is unbearable. It's a scenario that elicits profound empathy. Imagine witnessing one's pets subjected to the insertion of plastic tubes down their throats, administration of drugs, and ultimately being sacrificed for the sake of product testing. The gravity of animal testing becomes strikingly evident when we consider its implications for our cherished animal companions.
Proponents of animal testing often argue its necessity, especially in the realm of researching new viruses. However, alternative methods, such as in vitro testing, have emerged as viable alternatives. Scientists can now replicate human skin and test products without resorting to animal subjects. Another promising avenue is the use of computer programs that simulate the effects of drugs or viruses on human beings, factoring in variables like age and gender. Not only are these methods more accurate than animal testing, but they are also cost-effective. Despite the availability of these alternatives, animal testing persists, raising questions about the willingness of the scientific community to adopt more ethical and accurate methodologies.
In conclusion, the ethical implications, unreliability, and exorbitant costs associated with animal testing cannot be overlooked. With the advent of alternative methods like in vitro testing and computer simulations, the continued reliance on animal testing is not only inhumane but also outdated. It is imperative for governments worldwide to enact comprehensive bans on animal testing, ushering in an era where the well-being of both animals and humans is prioritized over archaic practices.
The Ethical Dilemma of Animal Testing: A Comprehensive Examination. (2016, Mar 24). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/speech-animal-testing-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment