Comparing and Contrasting Liafe in Post Secondary and Secondary Schools

The transition from secondary life to post secondary life can be a difficult task for many. This is because the two institutions are different in a number of ways yet they serve the same purpose of instilling values, ethics, discipline and social standards to millions of people who go through the institutions. Comparing and contrasting secondary life and post secondary life can be done in so many ways. Among the major things to compare or contrast include faculties, student social life, and structure of management, course expectations, standards, funding and most of all purpose (Ahmavaara and Diane 620).

It is quite clear that secondary school and post secondary institutions are further apart on the metrics mentioned above. However, even with the notable differences, they have a number of similarities and unique characters that make them stand out. In the transition of childhood to adulthood, secondary schools allow a person to acquire some sense of what it really means to be an adult (Ogg et al 801).

Get quality help now

Doctor Jennifer

Verified writer

Proficient in: Education

5 (893)

“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Conversely, post secondary institutions allow a person to take full ownership of their time, their responsibilities and allow one to make a choice on crucial matters like the path one wishes to follow in life. The main aim of students in secondary schools is to simply perform well in exams. 

However, their counterparts in post secondary institutions must be able to strike a balance between key issues that make or break a person. As one aims to make a good life and career out of their studies, they are additionally required to be working, start supporting themselves and still enjoy their stay in college.

Getting lost in the whirl is easy for post secondary life (Ahmavaara and Diane 620). This paper will compare and contrast the two worlds of secondary and post secondary schooling. The paper presents that despite the obvious reason, both serve the same purpose yet post secondary schools hold more weight in terms of a student's welfare.

Understanding the differences and learning how to bridge the gaps between secondary and the post secondary schooling allows one to have a better chance of succeeding in life. In comparing and contrasting the two key institutions, it can be noted that the standard of lifestyle, education and mannerism is quite different.

For instance, a secondary school student will constantly be reminded to carry out duties, responsibilities and functions. Teachers in secondary students are keen to remind students of due tasks like examinations and upcoming events. On the other hand, the standard of carrying oneself is completely different in post secondary schooling. No one is reminded on how to conduct themselves or how to manage their time. There is no one to monitor progress or remind students of due tasks and upcoming events (Langa 540).

Once a professor sets out the syllabus on the course calendar, it is assumed that every student is capable of carrying out the duties and tasks allocated without reminders from the authority. Standards can also be looked at in terms of class attendance. While it is mandatory to attend every class all through the year in secondary schooling, post secondary students are free to attend classes based on their own judgement and flexibility while meeting the attendance threshold. It is upon the students in the higher learning institutions to know and learn on how to handle the freedom the rein.

Course expectations are therefore the main difference between the two institutions. While a secondary school student is guided all through the syllabus, a post secondary student will be expected to meet some specifications without due guidance and instructions from the authority. Therefore, in terms of time management, students in post secondary institutions are more equipped, albeit through unavoidable means. The standards of management and self drive in secondary schools on the other hand are quite wanting. Teachers not only guide students in such but also go further to push and remind them of what is expected everyday of their stay in school.

Post secondary education allows one to develop skills in time management since tasks are expected to be completed in time and there is little to no supervision on the same. Therefore, it can be underlined that the main difference between the two institutions in terms of standards and course expectations is responsible utilization of time in post secondary schooling and following rules in secondary schools (Ahmavaara and Diane 620).

Social life in secondary and post secondary learning institutions also present a good platform for comparing and contrasting. Social life is rich in both institutions. As a matter of fact, secondary schools and post secondary institutions help to bloom relationships that go further and deep later in life. However, due to age differences, social life is different in the two institutions (Thompson et al 116). Population is a key factor in noting these differences. 

Post secondary school institutions are by far more populated than the secondary schools. Due to the difference in population, social life in post secondary institutions is limited to a small group of people who share common belief, career paths and special interests like hobbies (Langa 540). However, in secondary school social circles, almost everyone knows his/her schoolmates. Social events in secondary schools are more controlled and mostly planned well ahead of time. Social events in post secondary schools are not as coordinated since there is no supervision and flexibility is abundant. Administration and the authority have no part in the organization of events.

Another key area that has huge differences when comparing and contrasting the two institutions is the financial field and more so in funding. Post secondary education is by far more costly than secondary schooling which is for most parts free. Tuition fees fall anywhere between $1500 and $2000 per semester. Additionally, students are required to pay for their residence, rent and other forms of accommodation when they live away from home. Syllabus books are also compulsory belongings and they cost a fortune. 

In secondary schools however, schooling is usually funded by the government and therefore there is no need to pay tuition fee. Residence, rent and accommodation details are free since most students live at home. Schools provide books and therefore students do not incur this cost. Therefore, it is clear that funding may present a hurdle in post secondary schools while it is a non-issue in secondary schools.

In conclusion, every institution has a purpose and aim of existence. While the key aim of every learning institution is to instill education for better life in the future, secondary schools and post secondary schools go beyond to offer discipline, values and social benefits albeit using different approaches. 

Secondary schools are strict and establish rules that must be adhered to while post secondary institutions are flexible and welcoming to mold a student to be independent and their own manager later in life (Langa 540). On the primary basis of social life, funding and academic expectations, post secondary schools are more costly, academically challenging and more stimulating in terms of social life than secondary schools. However, both serve the same purpose of molding individuals for future gains.