To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The framers of the United States Constitution recognized the need to prevent the government from becoming too powerful and infringing on the liberties of its citizens. To achieve this, they endorsed the concept of the separation of powers, ensuring that different branches of government would serve as checks on one another. Federalist Paper 51, authored by James Madison, underscored the crucial relationship between the legislative and executive branches within this system. Madison stated, "In the republican government, the legislative authority necessarily predominates.
The remedy for this inconvenience is to divide the legislative into different branches... and the weakness of the executive may require, on the other hand, that it should be fortified."
While the separation of powers has effectively safeguarded the liberties of the American people, it has also resulted in an ongoing power struggle between the executive and legislative branches. This power struggle encompasses various aspects, including control over the economy, the authority to pass legislation, and command over the military.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Government
5 (204)
“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”
The prevalence of legislative power often limits the executive's authority, creating a significant imbalance between the demands placed on the President and their ability to respond swiftly. The President faces challenges in getting their policies approved by Congress, often encountering delays and extensive negotiations. Nevertheless, the fortification of the executive branch has enabled the President to overcome some of these limitations, particularly in their roles as Commander-in-Chief, Chief Diplomat, and Chief Legislator.
The President's authority as Commander-in-Chief stands as one of their most significant powers.
Although Congress possesses the sole authority to declare war, the President can deploy armed forces in situations that resemble warfare. Throughout American history, numerous Presidents have exercised this right. For example, President McKinley dispatched troops to Peking during the Boxer Rebellion, while President Truman sent troops to Korea as part of a police action. Presidents Kennedy, Johnson, and Nixon engaged in full-scale military operations in Southeast Asia without formal Congressional approval. However, in 1973, Congress took steps to regain some control over military decision-making.
The War Powers Act established specific conditions under which the President could deploy troops without Congressional approval. The President must report troop deployments to Congress within forty-eight hours. Congress then has the authority to pass a declaration of war within sixty days, extend the time limit, or withdraw the troops. In 1983, President Reagan tested the War Powers Act by seeking to keep troops in Lebanon. However, Congress limited the number of troops allowed to remain in the volatile region. Despite the War Powers Act, the authority of the President as Commander-in-Chief has grown over time, granting them greater flexibility in military matters.
As Chief Diplomat, the President holds several powers in dealing with foreign governments and foreign heads of state that do not necessitate Congressional consent. The President's recognition power is a crucial aspect of this role, enabling them to acknowledge or refuse recognition of foreign governments. This recognition serves as a preliminary step in establishing diplomatic relations or negotiations with another country. For instance, the United States did not officially recognize the Soviet Union until 1933, sixteen years after the Russian Revolution of 1917. The President's authority is further enhanced through the use of executive agreements.
Executive agreements, made directly between the President and other foreign leaders, do not require Senate approval, as the President is bound by their word. This method offers advantages over treaties, such as speed and secrecy, which can be essential in certain situations. However, unlike treaties, executive agreements are binding only during the administration that initiates them unless approved by the subsequent President. Nevertheless, the Senate retains the power to withhold funds necessary for implementing executive agreements. For instance, President Franklin Roosevelt employed executive agreements to bypass congressional isolationists when negotiating deals with other nations. The President's role as Chief Diplomat provides them with significant influence in shaping foreign policy.
While the President can propose legislation, Congress has the authority to review and may choose not to pass any of the administration's bills. To navigate this obstacle, the President must possess strong persuasive skills. According to political scientist Richard E. Neustadt, effective governance hinges on persuasion rather than commands. The President must persuade lawmakers that their interests align with the administration's goals. Conversely, the President must sign all bills passed by Congress to enact them into law. If the President opposes a bill, they can use their veto power, returning the unsigned bill to Congress. In such cases, Congress can amend the bill in the hopes of gaining Presidential approval or override the veto with a two-thirds vote in both chambers.
Another legislative tool is the line-item veto, allowing the President to veto specific sections of a bill while signing the rest into law. This power was granted to the President by Congress in 1996, with the condition that Congress could override the veto with a two-thirds majority. The veto is a potent instrument that enables the executive to shape legislation and exercise authority over critical decisions.
The President is endowed with unique powers and privileges that set them apart from the other branches of the U.S. government, further reinforcing the executive's authority. One of these powers is the ability to declare a state of emergency and exercise emergency powers. These inherent capabilities permit the President to make vital decisions during national crises, particularly in foreign matters, without requiring Congressional approval. Throughout U.S. history, Presidents have invoked emergency powers to address pressing issues.
Executive orders serve as another potent tool. An executive order is a rule or regulation issued by the President with the force of law. Such orders can implement treaties, statutes, and provisions within the Constitution, effectively functioning as a legislative power. The Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 mandates that executive orders be published in the Federal Register. Presidents have employed executive orders to implement affirmative action regulations, establish administrative procedures, ration consumer goods, and regulate the export of specific items.
Furthermore, executive privilege grants the President the authority to withhold information from the judicial system or Congress. While some critics argue that this privilege may be used to conceal information, it has only been tested once in U.S. history. During the Watergate Scandal, President Nixon asserted executive privilege, but the Supreme Court ordered him to release the tapes of Oval Office conversations in United States v. Nixon in 1974. Executive privilege serves as a shield, protecting the President from the oversight of the other two branches of government.
Traditionally, when a President enters office, they propose a budget, which Congress must approve. However, the President is not obligated to spend the entire budget allocated by Congress. This practice is known as the impoundment of funds. Presidents like Jefferson, Grant, Hoover, and Roosevelt deferred money, while Truman and Kennedy chose not to allocate all military funds. In 1974, the Budget and Impoundment Control Act was enacted in response to President Nixon's refusal to spend Congress-allocated funds. The law mandated that the President spend all appropriated funds, with only a few exceptions. If the President wishes not to spend particular funds, they must notify Congress. However, Congress can override the President's decision if they do not grant consent to withhold the funds within forty-five days. This act has somewhat limited the executive's control over budgetary matters, giving Congress a degree of influence in this domain.
Over the past six decades, the executive branch has experienced a significant expansion of power, allowing the President to exert substantial influence that rivals the authority of Congress. However, this increasing power is seen by many as necessary to maintain a strong executive branch in the United States. As the nation faces a rapidly changing world and complex domestic issues, the ability of the President to act decisively and effectively is crucial for governance.
The role of the American President has evolved to encompass more extensive powers and responsibilities than the framers of the Constitution initially envisioned. In many ways, this evolution has been driven by the need for a more robust executive to address the challenges of modern governance. Nevertheless, the system of checks and balances remains intact, with Congress retaining significant authority to oversee and influence the executive branch's actions.
The separation of powers, a cornerstone of the United States Constitution, has played a pivotal role in preserving the liberties of American citizens. While it has engendered a constant struggle for power between the executive and legislative branches, it has also allowed for a system of checks and balances that prevents any one branch from becoming too dominant. This equilibrium has been maintained by fortifying the executive branch, granting the President certain powers and privileges.
The President's roles as Commander-in-Chief, Chief Diplomat, and Chief Legislator have expanded their influence and capacity to act decisively. Emergency powers, executive orders, and executive privilege further empower the President. However, the President's authority remains subject to the constraints of the Constitution and the oversight of Congress. The modern executive branch operates in a complex and rapidly changing world, requiring adaptability and strength to effectively address the nation's challenges.
In conclusion, the United States' system of government is a delicate balance between separation of powers and a fortified executive branch, reflecting the nation's commitment to preserving liberty and effective governance.
The Separation of Powers and the Evolving Role of the American President. (2016, Jun 22). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-executive-branch-of-the-u-s-goverment-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
