To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
René Descartes, a pivotal figure in the history of philosophy, embarked on a philosophical journey to establish a foundation for certain knowledge. Having laid down the Cogito as the 'first principle,' Descartes faced the daunting task of reconstructing a system of beliefs he dismantled in the First Meditation. However, rather than directly building upon the claimed 'firm foundation' of the cogito, Descartes took a 'curiously indirect route' by seeking to prove the existence of God.
Descartes' motivation for establishing God's existence before delving into the realms of scientific or natural existence is rooted in his quest for an unshakable basis for knowledge.
To construct a new and certain knowledge directly from the cogito would be fraught with challenges, as obsessive doubts over the truth of perceptions would permeate every stage of consideration. By proving God's existence, Descartes aimed to lay the groundwork for 'clear and distinct perceptions' based on 'fundamental innate truths implanted by God,' allowing the construction of a certain and permanent structure of knowledge.
Descartes presents two arguments for the existence of God in the Meditations: the 'trademark argument' and the 'ontological argument.' Let us delve into the 'trademark argument' that constitutes the first line of defense in Descartes' quest for God's existence.
The construction of the 'trademark argument' commences with an inventory of ideas contained within us.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Arguments
5 (339)
“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”
Among these, Descartes identifies an idea of a "supreme God, eternal, infinite, omniscient, omnipotent, and the Creator of all things." This idea of God serves as a cornerstone for Descartes' argumentation.
He employs the 'Causal Adequacy Principle,' asserting that "there must be at least as much reality in the... total cause as in the effect of that cause."
Following this principle, Descartes argues that a stone, for example, cannot be produced except by something that contains everything found in the stone. The Causal Adequacy Principle, he contends, is an extension of the fundamental axiom, Ex nihilo nihil fit, or 'nothing comes from nothing.' As Descartes emphasizes, "if we admit that there is something in the effect that was not previously present in the cause, we shall also have to admit that this something was produced by nothing."
Ideas, according to Descartes, contain 'objective reality,' signifying that the idea encapsulates a representation of reality within itself. For instance, Descartes argues, his idea of Pembroke Hall is based on objective reality, as the idea mirrors the reality of Pembroke Hall itself. Thus, if these premises form the foundation of the 'trademark argument,' how does Descartes, and by extension, we, arrive at the proof of God's existence?
Descartes has an idea of God described as "eternal, infinite, omniscient, omnipotent..." If we adhere to the Causal Adequacy Principle, the cause of Descartes' idea of God must possess all the features objectively or representatively present in the idea. Acknowledging his finite and imperfect nature, Descartes concludes that he cannot be the cause of the idea, and the idea does not originate from the amalgamation of other ideas, as this would lead to a primary idea with a cause disseminated in a similar manner.
Hence, Descartes argues, the ultimate cause of his idea of God must possess all the perfections represented in the idea. From this line of reasoning, Descartes confidently asserts, "it must necessarily be concluded that God exists."
Despite Descartes' bold assertion that "it must necessarily be concluded that God exists," serious objections can be raised, primarily concerning the Causal Adequacy Principle upon which the argument relies. One significant weakness lies in the implication of what critics term an 'heirloom view of causation.'
The Causal Adequacy Principle posits that an effect can possess a certain property only by inheriting it from its causes, leaving no room for cases where objects may be greater than the sum of their parts. However, critics question the applicability of this view, citing examples such as the construction of a bridge. In such cases, the strength of the bridge exceeds the sum of its individual parts, challenging the principle's adequacy in explaining complex causal relationships.
Another critical standpoint arises from the assumption that ideas inherently possess 'objective reality,' indicating a direct link to external realities. This assumption prompts inquiries into the nature of ideas and their intricate relationship with external objects. Furthermore, Descartes' conclusion hinges on accepting the Causal Adequacy Principle as true, a premise that may be subject to contention and skepticism.
Descartes' philosophical journey, extending from the Cogito to the proof of God's existence, reflects an intricate approach to laying the groundwork for certain knowledge. While the 'trademark argument' crafts a case based on causation and the nature of ideas, its reliance on the contentious Causal Adequacy Principle invites critical scrutiny. A thorough exploration and evaluation of Descartes' arguments contribute to a nuanced understanding of his profound philosophical endeavor.
Descartes' Arguments for the Existence of God. (2020, Jun 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-causal-adequacy-principle-in-philosophy-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
