To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The discourse surrounding public policy and gun control is mired in diverse and often biased opinions. The contention arises from the perception that gun control deviates from the typical trajectory of public policy formation, which historically follows shocking incidents or crises capturing public attention. This, in turn, triggers debates encompassing philosophical, regulatory, constitutional, or technical aspects of the issue, ultimately leading to investigations and changes in public policy aimed at preventing or deterring reoccurrences of such actions.
Two seminal incidents, the shooting of United States Representative Gabrielle Giffords and the massacre at an Aurora, Colorado movie theatre, stand as stark examples demanding a critical examination of the existing public policy concerning gun control.
Despite the gravity of these events, a thorough investigation into the potential shortcomings of current gun control policies did not materialize. This omission underscores the need for a closer scrutiny of the nexus between public policy and the evolving landscape of gun control regulations.
The landscape of gun control in the United States is marked by a complex interplay of federal and state laws.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Gun Control
4.7 (657)
“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”
While various federal regulations have been enacted since 1934 to foster the control and regulation of firearms, each of the fifty states maintains distinct laws, varying in severity, as sanctioned by the citizens and legislators. This divergence exemplifies the intricate tapestry of gun control policies across the nation, illustrating the challenges of achieving a unified approach.
Central to the debate on gun control is the perpetual discussion surrounding the interpretation of the 2nd amendment.
Enshrined in the Bill of Rights, this amendment states, "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed." Despite its significance, this constitutional provision remains one of the most contested and construed laws in the realm of gun control.
Beyond the 2nd amendment, historical legal benchmarks punctuate the trajectory of gun control legislation. In 1837, Georgia attempted to curtail handgun ownership through legislation, a move subsequently overturned on the grounds of unconstitutionality. In the aftermath of emancipation in 1865, southern states implemented "black codes," restricting black individuals from possessing firearms. Meanwhile, the formation of the National Rifle Association (NRA) in 1871 aimed at enhancing the marksmanship of American civilians in preparation for war, signifying an early organizational response to the evolving landscape of gun control.
The legislative landscape governing gun control underwent pivotal moments with the introduction of seminal acts. The National Firearms Act of 1934 marked a milestone by regulating fully automatic firearms, emblematic of Congress's early efforts to exert control over specific categories of weapons. The Gun Control Act of 1968 expanded regulatory measures, prohibiting firearm ownership for those convicted of non-business felonies, individuals deemed mentally incompetent, and users of illegal drugs. This act not only regulated imported guns but also imposed restrictions on the sale of handguns.
The regulatory journey continued in 1972 with the establishment of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF), tasked with enforcing federal firearms laws and controlling the illicit use and sale of firearms. In 1977, the District of Columbia enacted an anti-handgun law mandating the registration of all rifles and shotguns within its jurisdiction, adding another layer to the evolving mosaic of regional gun control measures.
The year 1986 witnessed a legislative cascade with the enactment of significant acts shaping the contours of gun control policy. The Armed Career Criminal Act (Public Law 99-570) heightened penalties for firearm possession by those unqualified under the Gun Control Act of 1968. Simultaneously, the Firearms Owners Protection Act (Public Law 99-308) relaxed certain restrictions on gun and ammunition sales, introducing mandatory penalties for firearm use during the commission of a crime. In tandem, the Law Enforcement Officers Protection Act (Public Law 99-408) targeted "cop killer" bullets, prohibiting their possession and sale.
The legislative momentum persisted into 1990 with the Crime Control Act (Public Law 101-647), imposing a ban on manufacturing and importing semiautomatic assault weapons in the United States. Additionally, the act established "gun-free school zones" with specific penalties for violations, marking a strategic move to enhance safety within educational environments. This legislative package underscored a nuanced approach, addressing both the manufacturing and importing aspects of firearms regulation.
The mid-1990s witnessed the introduction of landmark legislation reshaping the landscape of gun control. The Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act (Public Law 103-159), enacted in 1994, imposed a five-day waiting period on handgun purchases, coupled with mandatory background checks conducted by local law enforcement agencies. Concurrently, the Violent Crime Control and Law Enforcement Act of 1994 (Public Law 103-322) constituted a comprehensive response by banning the sale, manufacture, importation, or possession of specific types of assault weapons.
In the same legislative vein, the year 1998 marked a technological pivot with the implementation of the National Instant Criminal Background Check (NICS) system. The Brady Act's permanent provisions mandated its use by gun dealers, thereby enhancing the scrutiny applied to potential firearm purchasers.
In summation, the intricate tapestry of public policy and gun control in the United States unfolds through a historical continuum of incidents, constitutional interpretations, and legislative responses. The ongoing debate surrounding the 2nd amendment, coupled with a myriad of federal and state laws, illustrates the dynamic nature of this policy domain. From the early attempts at regulation in the 19th century to the comprehensive legislative acts of the late 20th century, the evolution of gun control reflects a complex interplay of constitutional principles, societal concerns, and legislative initiatives.
The Complex Evolution of Gun Control in the United States. (2016, Sep 21). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/public-policy-and-gun-control-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
