To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Organizations operate under diverse structures tailored to their unique needs, products, and customer services. In the ever-evolving landscape of business, the intricacies of organizational structures play a pivotal role in shaping how companies function and adapt. This essay aims to delve deeper into the nuances of these structures, with a specific focus on three distinct entities: Farmers Insurance Group, Ford Motor Company, and Westhorp & Associates, Inc. By scrutinizing and comparing these organizations, we gain valuable insights into the strategic choices they make in aligning their structures with their goals and the dynamic demands of the market.
At the core of Farmers Insurance Group's organizational framework is a functional structure, wherein departments are staffed based on similar responsibilities.
This approach, while enhancing efficiency and productivity, raises concerns about inter-departmental communication. For instance, auto claims adjusters, commercial adjusters, and marketing representatives each reside in separate departments, ensuring no overlap at lower management levels. Geographically, the organization further divides to address the varying market needs across the United States.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Insurance
5 (876)
“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”
This geographical division is crucial for adapting to regional differences, such as refraining from writing homeowner policies in Florida due to hurricane risks but offering them in Texas.
These dual structures, functional and geographical, allow Farmers Insurance Group to navigate its vast operations smoothly. The geographical segmentation ensures tailored services for each region, reflecting the organization's commitment to meeting diverse market demands.
Ford Motor Company, in contrast, adopts a divisional organizational structure, strategically separating divisions based on target customers.
The SUV division focuses on young, growing families, aligning all resources and functions accordingly. Similarly, the Truck division tailors its offerings to blue-collar workers, emphasizing the transportation of heavy materials. This customer-centric divisional structure enables Ford to align its resources precisely with the distinct needs of each customer segment.
Westhorp & Associates, Inc, opts for a matrix organizational structure, wherein engineers report to a specific manager regularly but can be assigned to different projects, reporting to project managers as needed. This flexibility allows the company to efficiently manage resources and expertise across various projects, showcasing adaptability in addressing project-specific requirements.
Examining Farmers Insurance Group's strategic moves, it is crucial to delve into its acquisitions and the subsequent integration challenges. In 2007, the acquisition of Bristol West Holdings initiated a series of changes, with integration efforts starting in 2008. The acquisition of 21st Century Insurance followed in 2009. Initially, each company operated independently, but the integration posed challenges in terms of redundancy, technology disparities, and increased operational expenses.
Human resources played a pivotal role, introducing a certification process evaluating personnel based on technical knowledge, decision-making abilities, and acceptable behaviors. Technological discrepancies, especially during the Bristol West integration, led to reduced productivity, customer service issues, and staffing requirements. The subsequent meetings aimed at streamlining acquired computer systems and reevaluating staffing structures to align with the integrated technologies.
Recently, Farmers Insurance Group made significant organizational changes by splitting off Bristol West Holdings into its own entity. This decision stemmed from Bristol West being a non-standard auto insurance carrier, experiencing financial losses when molded into the standard model under Farmers Insurance Group. The split allowed Bristol West to operate independently, tailoring its processes to the non-standard market. This change also affected the organizational structure due to the substantial size difference between the split entities.
Unlike Farmers Insurance Group, Bristol West Holdings utilizes site managers instead of regional directors. This change eliminates the need for regional directors, as site managers, based in individual offices, handle claims processing for one or more states. The shift in organizational design is a direct response to the unique nature and size of the newly separated company.
The selection of organizational structures is a strategic decision, tailored to the specific needs of each organization. Farmers Insurance Group, as a large entity, strategically employs multiple structures simultaneously. Geographical structuring becomes essential for smooth operations, considering the diverse products and services offered. The segmentation goes deeper into specialty divisions within each region, such as separate departments for homeowner and personal auto claims, acknowledging the variation in laws across states.
Furthermore, the marketing department illustrates an even more segmented approach, addressing public needs with careful attention. This tactical use of multiple organizational structures allows Farmers Insurance Group to remain agile and responsive to the ever-changing market demands.
Organizations must remain vigilant through constant monitoring and evaluation to adapt and grow. Farmers Insurance Group exemplifies this by making necessary adjustments to provide superior products and services while staying true to its organizational goals. The segmentation of departments, such as homeowner and personal auto claims, ensures compliance with state laws and the individualized needs of the public.
Management functions play a vital role in determining when and how to course-correct, aligning the organization with its vision and goals. This adaptability is essential as organizational visions and goals evolve over time, requiring a proactive approach to stay on track.
In conclusion, understanding organizational structures unveils the dynamic strategies employed by businesses to meet their unique challenges. Farmers Insurance Group's multifaceted approach, Ford Motor Company's targeted divisions, and Westhorp & Associates, Inc's adaptive matrix structure showcase the diverse ways organizations navigate the complex terrain of the business world. It is through constant vigilance, strategic adjustments, and a commitment to organizational goals that businesses can not only survive but thrive in an ever-evolving landscape.
Strategic Organizational Dynamics in Company Culture. (2016, May 10). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/organizational-structure-paper-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
