The Soft Drink Industry: Barriers, Loyalty, and Strategic Dynamics

The Soft Drink Industry: A Comprehensive Examination

The landscape of the soft drink industry is characterized by unique dynamics that confer substantial advantages upon existing players, creating formidable barriers for potential new entrants. This essay delves into the various factors that contribute to the industry's distinct competitive structure, ranging from supply-side economies to consumer preferences and the strategic maneuvers of major players.

Supply-Side Economies and Consumer Loyalty

One of the primary impediments for new entrants in the soft drink industry is the formidable supply-side economy that necessitates a large-scale market entry.

The capital required to establish a presence in this market is substantial, with concentrate manufacturers investing $25 to $50 million to set up plants capable of serving the entire United States. This financial threshold, while manageable for established players, poses a significant challenge for newcomers.

Furthermore, the demand-side benefits of scale wielded by carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) contribute to the difficulty faced by new entrants. A 2002 survey revealed that a remarkable 37% of respondents chose a CSD as their favorite brand, showcasing the high brand loyalty among consumers.

Get quality help now
Marrie pro writer
Marrie pro writer
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Business

star star star star 5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

In stark contrast, only 10% expressed such loyalty towards bottled water. This loyalty acts as a formidable barrier, dissuading consumers from embracing products from new entrants.

Capital Requirements and Unequal Access

The capital required for entry into the soft drink industry may seem relatively modest, but the challenge lies in competing with well-established brands and the extensive, unrecoverable advertising expenditures incurred by major players. These expenditures, coupled with the unequal access to bottlers and retail channels, further compound the hurdles for newcomers.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

Most bottlers are ensconced in long-term contracts with major CSD brands, limiting the options available to new entrants. Additionally, supermarkets, constituting a substantial distribution channel, view CSDs as a "big traffic draw," allocating minimal shelf space for products from new and untested brands.

Fear of Retaliation and Bargaining Power

The strong apprehension of retaliation from major players is another significant deterrent for new entrants. The fear of facing aggressive responses from industry giants hampers the willingness of potential newcomers to enter the market.

Examining the bargaining power, suppliers of CSD raw materials have minimal leverage due to the undifferentiated nature of their commodities. On the buyer side, end consumers, driven by brand loyalty, possess limited bargaining power. In contrast, retail channels wield more influence due to their substantial purchasing quantities, yet even they face constraints, especially supermarkets, where CSDs are deemed crucial for drawing customer traffic.

Threat of Substitutes and Industry Adaptability

Despite the emergence of alternatives, the threat of substitutes for CSDs remains relatively low. The unique taste and properties of CSDs make them challenging to replace, even in the face of health concerns. While there has been a shift towards alternatives with natural flavors, major CSD firms have adeptly adapted to this trend, maintaining their dominance in the market.

Rivalry Among Existing Competitors

The apparent intensity of rivalry among existing competitors, including industry giants like Coke, Pepsi, and Cadbury Schweppes, has not eroded the industry's profitability. Instead, the focus on promotion, advertising, and branding has been instrumental in sustaining profitability. The Cola War between Coke and Pepsi, far from diminishing profitability, has fueled continuous improvement within the industry.

As former Pepsi CEO Roger Enrico aptly puts it, "Without Coke, Pepsi would have a tough time being an original and lively competitor." This acknowledgment underscores the symbiotic relationship between major players, where success begets sharper competition, fostering innovation and growth.


In conclusion, the soft drink industry's unique competitive landscape is shaped by a combination of factors that fortify existing players and present formidable challenges for new entrants. From supply-side economies to consumer loyalty, capital requirements, and the strategic dynamics among major players, each element contributes to the industry's distinctiveness. Despite the apparent rivalry among existing competitors, the profitability of the industry remains robust, driven by strategic competition and continuous improvement.

Updated: Jan 21, 2024
Cite this page

The Soft Drink Industry: Barriers, Loyalty, and Strategic Dynamics. (2017, Mar 16). Retrieved from

The Soft Drink Industry: Barriers, Loyalty, and Strategic Dynamics essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment