To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In the ever-evolving landscape of business and management, the process of strategic planning stands as a vital compass guiding organizations toward their desired destinations. The art of planning is more than just an administrative exercise; it is the foundation upon which an organization's mission, objectives, and strategies are built. It is the thread that weaves together the fabric of an organization's purpose, providing clarity, direction, and a roadmap for the future.
This essay delves into the intricate nature of the planning process, exploring its significance, levels, responsibilities, time horizons, and the pivotal role it plays in organizational success.
By examining the key steps involved in planning, we gain insight into the intricate web of decisions that managers must navigate. From corporate-level strategies that shape an organization's identity to functional-level strategies that enhance its operational efficiency, planning is the linchpin that holds it all together.
Planning is an essential process that managers employ to identify and select appropriate goals and courses of action for their organizations.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Competitive Advantage
4.7 (346)
“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”
This process involves making decisions and taking actions to help an organization achieve its objectives, which collectively form its strategy. Therefore, planning serves as both a goal-setting and strategy-making activity. The planning process comprises three key steps:
A mission statement serves as a broad declaration of the organization's purpose, delineating its products, customers, and distinguishing features compared to its competitors.
In larger organizations, planning occurs at three distinct levels of management: Corporate Level, Business or Division Level, and Department or Functional Level.
The Corporate-level plan encompasses top management's decisions concerning the organization's mission, overall strategy, and structure. Additionally, it defines the industries and national markets in which the organization intends to compete, providing the framework for divisional managers to create their business-level plans.
At the Business level, managers within each division formulate Business-level plans. These plans outline long-term goals aligned with corporate goals, as well as the division's business-level strategy and structure. Business-level strategy specifies the approaches a division or business intends to employ in competing within its industry.
Functional-level plans articulate the goals that functional managers propose to pursue to support the division's business-level objectives, ultimately enabling the organization to achieve its corporate goals. These plans detail the actions that managers intend to take within their respective departments to contribute to the organization's overall success.
An essential aspect of planning is ensuring consistency across these three levels. Functional goals and strategies should align with divisional goals and strategies, which, in turn, should be congruent with corporate goals and strategies. This interconnectedness ensures that all parts of the organization work cohesively towards the same objectives.
In general, corporate-level planning is primarily the responsibility of top managers. They oversee the corporate-level planning process and ensure that business and functional-level plans are in harmony with the corporate plan. However, corporate planning decisions do not occur in isolation, as input from other managers is encouraged and considered valuable. Lower-level managers are often given opportunities to contribute to corporate-level planning.
At the Business level, divisional managers take charge of planning, which includes reviewing functional plans. Functional managers also actively participate in Business-level planning. Similarly, while functional managers bear primary responsibility for functional-level planning, they may involve their subordinates in this process.
Plans vary in terms of their time horizons or intended durations. Typically, managers distinguish between long-term plans (with a horizon of five years or more), intermediate-term plans (ranging from one to five years), and short-term plans (with a horizon of one year or less). Long and intermediate-term plans are commonly associated with corporate and business-level goals and strategies, while intermediate and short-term plans are more relevant to functional-level goals and strategies.
Most organizations operate on an annual planning cycle, often aligned with their annual financial budget. Although corporate or business-level plans may span over five years or more, they are typically treated as rolling plans. This approach involves updating and amending the plans annually to accommodate changes in the external environment. Rolling plans allow managers to make adjustments or even alter the plan's direction if necessary due to shifting circumstances.
Managers employ both standing and single-use plans to work toward an organization's specific goals.
Standing plans are used in situations where programmed decision making is suitable. These plans are developed for recurring situations. They include policies (general guides to action), rules (formal, written guides to action), and standard operating procedures (SOPs, written instructions describing the precise sequence of actions to follow in specific situations). These tools help control how employees perform their tasks consistently.
Single-use plans, on the other hand, are created to address nonprogrammed decision making in unique or one-of-a-kind situations. They encompass Programs, which consist of integrated sets of plans designed to achieve specific goals, and Projects, which are specific action plans developed to complete various aspects of a program.
By employing standing and single-use plans as needed, managers ensure that their organizations are well-prepared to navigate a wide range of decision-making scenarios effectively.
Planning is a fundamental process that plays a crucial role in an organization's success. It determines an organization's current position, outlines its desired future state, and charts the course for moving forward. When managers engage in planning, they must envision the future, anticipate potential developments, and mobilize the organization's resources to address future opportunities and challenges. However, the external environment is characterized by uncertainty and complexity, and managers often must make decisions with incomplete information and limited rationality. Virtually all managers engage in planning because the absence of a well-thought-out plan can lead to hesitation, missteps, and misguided changes of direction that can harm an organization. Planning is essential for four key reasons:
Planning serves as an effective means to involve managers in decision-making processes related to an organization's goals and strategies. It encourages collaborative efforts among managers to identify the most suitable objectives and courses of action for the organization.
A well-structured plan gives the organization a clear sense of direction and purpose. It articulates the organization's goals and the strategies it intends to employ to achieve them. This clarity of purpose guides the organization's actions and decisions.
Planning plays a crucial role in coordinating the efforts of managers across different functions and divisions within an organization. It ensures that all components of the organization align their activities to work toward common objectives.
A well-designed plan can function as a control mechanism within an organization. It not only specifies the goals and strategies the organization is committed to but also assigns responsibility for executing the strategies required to achieve these goals.
Henri Fayol emphasized that effective plans should possess four essential qualities:
One approach for creating plans that embody these qualities is scenario planning, also known as contingency planning. Scenario planning involves generating multiple forecasts of future conditions and analyzing effective responses to each scenario. Planning inherently involves predicting and anticipating the future, but given its unpredictability, scenario planning offers a practical strategy. Managers create different scenarios based on various assumptions about future conditions and develop corresponding plans to address each scenario should it materialize.
Scenario planning not only equips organizations to anticipate the challenges of an uncertain future but also fosters strategic thinking among managers.
The first step in the planning process is to establish the organization's mission and goals. These foundational elements, once agreed upon and formalized in the corporate plan, guide subsequent planning efforts by defining which strategies are appropriate and which are not.
Defining the organization's business is a prerequisite for determining its mission. Managers must clarify the nature of their business to identify the value they intend to provide to customers. This involves addressing three fundamental questions:
Answering these questions helps managers understand the current customer needs they fulfill, anticipate future needs, and identify their true competitors. This information is invaluable in shaping the organization's goals and plans.
Once the business is defined, managers must set a set of primary goals that the organization is committed to achieving. Developing these goals provides the organization with a sense of purpose and direction. While the CEO typically plays a central role in articulating major goals, input from other managers is valuable. Effective organizational goals are both challenging and realistic. They should stretch the organization's capabilities while remaining attainable. Additionally, the timeframe for goal achievement should be specified, emphasizing the importance of achieving goals within a reasonable period.
Strategy formulation involves the analysis of an organization's current situation and the development of strategies to accomplish its mission and achieve its goals. It commences with an examination of internal and external factors affecting the organization's ability to meet current and future goals. Managers often employ techniques like SWOT analysis and the five forces model to assess these factors.
SWOT analysis is a strategic planning exercise in which managers systematically identify an organization's internal Strengths and Weaknesses, as well as external Opportunities and Threats in its environment. Based on the insights gained from a SWOT analysis, managers at various organizational levels craft corporate-, business-, and functional-level strategies to position the organization optimally for achieving its mission and goals. The initial step in SWOT analysis involves identifying an organization's strengths and weaknesses, focusing on its current state.
The second step involves conducting a comprehensive SWOT planning exercise to pinpoint potential opportunities and threats in the environment. These opportunities and threats can either currently affect the organization or may influence it in the future. Armed with the outcomes of the SWOT analysis, which highlight strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats, managers can embark on the planning process and formulate strategies that enable the organization to attain its mission and goals. These strategies should empower the organization to leverage its strengths, capitalize on opportunities, mitigate threats, and address weaknesses effectively.
Michael Porter's five forces model is a renowned framework that helps managers identify specific external forces in the environment that pose potential threats to an organization. Porter identified these five critical factors that can significantly impact the profitability of organizations operating in the same industry:
Porter argued that when managers analyze opportunities and threats, they should pay particular attention to these five forces as they represent significant threats that organizations are likely to encounter. Corporate, business, and functional-level managers are responsible for developing strategies to counter these threats, enabling the organization to navigate its task and general environments effectively, achieve high performance, and generate substantial profits.
Corporate-level strategy is the plan of action that guides an organization's decisions regarding which industries and countries to invest in, aligning resources with the organization's mission and goals. Most organizations aspire to grow and actively seek new opportunities to utilize their resources to create more value for customers. Additionally, some managers must help their organizations respond to threats arising from changes in the task or general environment, such as shifts in customer preferences or new market entrants.
Top managers are responsible for identifying the most suitable strategies to address these changes and enhance organizational performance. Principal corporate-level strategies employed by managers to foster growth, maintain industry leadership, or rejuvenate declining organizations include:
Many organizations begin their journey of growth and development with a corporate-level strategy that emphasizes the concentration of resources in a single business or industry. This approach aims to establish a strong competitive position within the industry. Sometimes, focusing on a single business becomes an appropriate corporate-level strategy when managers perceive the need to downsize the organization to improve performance. In such cases, managers may divest certain industries, lay off employees, and concentrate the remaining resources in a different market or business to enhance performance. Conversely, when organizations are performing well, they often opt to enter new industries where they can leverage their resources to create more value.
Diversification entails expanding operations into new businesses or industries and offering new products or services. There are two primary types of diversification:
However, excessive diversification can lead to a loss of focus on the organization's core business, as it becomes challenging for top managers to stay informed about the various business units. This information overload may result in resource allocation decisions based on superficial analyses of each division's competitive position, potentially leading to value erosion rather than creation.
Corporate-level managers must decide on the most suitable approach for international competition. Organizations may opt for a Global Strategy, where they sell standardized products and use a consistent marketing approach across all national markets. Alternatively, they may adopt a Multidomestic Strategy, customizing products and marketing strategies to cater to specific national conditions.
The global strategy offers significant cost savings by avoiding the need for extensive customization to accommodate various national markets. However, it may leave the organization vulnerable to local competitors that tailor their products to local preferences. In contrast, the multidomestic strategy can allow organizations to gain market share and command higher prices for their products by customizing them to local tastes. However, customization typically results in higher production costs and may lead to pricing disadvantages compared to competitors pursuing a global strategy.
The increasingly competitive global environment presents both opportunities and threats for organizations and their managers. On the one hand, global expansion allows organizations to tap into new markets, reach a broader customer base, and access fresh sources of raw materials and cost-effective suppliers. On the other hand, international expansion exposes organizations to new competitors and necessitates adaptations to unfamiliar political, economic, and cultural landscapes. Prior to venturing into foreign markets, managers must conduct a thorough analysis of the host country's environment to select the most suitable expansion method and respond effectively to the prevailing conditions.
There are four fundamental ways for organizations to operate in the global arena:
The simplest global operations involve importing and exporting. Exporting entails manufacturing products domestically and selling them abroad, either directly or through local foreign distributors. This approach carries relatively low risks since organizations do not need to invest extensively in foreign manufacturing facilities. Conversely, importing involves selling products at home that are manufactured abroad. The internet has streamlined the process of reaching potential international customers for companies engaged in exporting.
Licensing allows a company to grant a foreign organization the authority to manufacture and distribute one or more of its products in the licensee's country or designated region, typically in exchange for a negotiated fee. Licensing offers the advantage of avoiding the development costs associated with establishing foreign manufacturing operations. However, it entails risks related to sharing technological know-how with the foreign partner. Franchising, on the other hand, involves selling the rights to use a company's brand name and operational expertise to a foreign entity, typically in exchange for an upfront payment and a share of profits. While franchising avoids the expense of overseas expansion, it can lead to reduced control over the franchisee's operations and potential quality issues.
One approach to address control-related challenges associated with exporting, licensing, and franchising is to expand globally through strategic alliances. In this arrangement, managers combine their organization's resources and expertise with those of a foreign company. Both organizations share the benefits and risks of launching a new venture in a foreign market. A strategic alliance can involve a formal written agreement for resource exchange or the creation of a new entity. A joint venture, for example, represents a strategic alliance in which two or more companies jointly establish and co-own a new business.
Managers can opt to establish wholly owned foreign subsidiaries, where they invest in foreign production operations independently, without direct involvement from local entities. Operating autonomously, without foreign company participation, organizations assume full control over operations abroad. While this method entails higher initial investments compared to other approaches, it offers several advantages, including greater potential returns and enhanced protection of technology and know-how. Moreover, managers maintain control over all aspects of the business and protect their intellectual property.
When organizations perform well in their core business, managers often seek opportunities to enhance value creation by either producing their own inputs (backward vertical integration) or managing their own distribution and sales channels (forward vertical integration).
Vertical integration is a corporate-level strategy that allows organizations to:
Vertical integration is attractive to managers because it offers opportunities to create value and improve cost efficiency. However, this strategy can become problematic when environmental forces counter the organization's plans, necessitating restructuring or retrenchment. Furthermore, excessive vertical integration may limit an organization's adaptability to changing environmental conditions.
According to renowned strategist Michael Porter, managers face critical decisions regarding the enhancement of an organization's product value. These decisions revolve around either differentiating the product to add value or reducing the costs associated with value creation. Additionally, managers must choose whether to serve the entire market or concentrate on a specific market segment. Based on these choices, organizations can adopt one of four business-level strategies:
Functional-level strategies are designed to enhance the ability of individual functions within an organization to create value. These strategies involve actions taken by function managers to increase the value of an organization's products and services, ultimately leading to higher customer satisfaction and perceived value. The price customers are willing to pay for a product reflects their perception of its value.
There are two primary approaches through which functions can contribute to an organization's product value:
For an organization to succeed in maximizing customer value and achieving its mission and goals, there must be alignment between functional-level and business-level strategies. The synergy between these strategies enhances the organization's competitive advantage and its ability to attract customers and revenue.
Once appropriate strategies are identified to fulfill an organization's mission and objectives, the next challenge is their effective implementation. Strategy implementation is a meticulous five-step process:
It is important to note that strategy implementation may necessitate substantial changes, including organizational structure redesign, the development of new control systems, and the implementation of cultural transformation programs within the organization.
In conclusion, the nature of the planning process is a fundamental aspect of organizational management, and its significance cannot be overstated. Planning serves as the cornerstone upon which an organization's mission, goals, and strategies are built. It encompasses three key steps: determining the organization's mission and goals, formulating strategies to achieve them, and implementing those strategies effectively. These steps are critical for organizations to chart a clear path forward, ensure consistency across different management levels, and achieve their objectives.
Planning takes place at various levels within an organization, including corporate, business or divisional, and department or functional levels. This hierarchical approach ensures that goals and strategies are aligned across the entire organization, fostering cohesion and synergy in pursuit of common objectives.
The responsibility for planning is distributed among different managerial levels, with top managers primarily involved in corporate-level planning. However, planning decisions are not made in isolation, and input from lower-level managers is valued and encouraged. This collaborative approach enhances the quality and effectiveness of the planning process.
Plans also differ in their time horizons, ranging from long-term to short-term plans, each serving specific purposes and addressing different aspects of an organization's operations. Rolling plans, updated annually, allow organizations to adapt to changing circumstances and maintain flexibility in their strategies.
Both standing and single-use plans are essential tools for managers to navigate various decision-making scenarios effectively. Standing plans, including policies, rules, and standard operating procedures, ensure consistency in employee actions. Single-use plans, such as programs and projects, are tailored to address unique or nonprogrammed situations.
The importance of planning cannot be overstated, as it plays a pivotal role in an organization's success. It promotes managerial participation in decision-making, provides direction and purpose, facilitates coordination, and enables effective control. Effective planning embodies qualities such as unity, continuity, accuracy, and flexibility, ensuring that organizations can adapt and thrive in an ever-changing environment.
Scenario planning offers a practical approach to planning in an uncertain world, allowing organizations to anticipate and prepare for various potential future scenarios. This strategy fosters strategic thinking among managers and enhances an organization's readiness to address unforeseen challenges.
The planning process begins with determining the organization's mission and goals, which provide the foundation for subsequent planning efforts. Defining the business and establishing major goals are crucial steps in this process, providing clarity of purpose and direction for the organization.
Formulating strategies involves analyzing internal and external factors, such as SWOT analysis and the five forces model, to develop plans that align with the organization's mission and goals. Corporate-level strategies encompass decisions about which industries and markets to enter, while business-level strategies focus on product value and market segmentation. Functional-level strategies contribute to value creation within individual functions.
The effective implementation of strategies is essential for their success and involves assigning responsibility, developing action plans, establishing timetables, allocating resources, and holding individuals or groups accountable. Strategy implementation may require significant organizational changes and cultural transformation to align with the chosen strategies.
In conclusion, planning is a dynamic and multifaceted process that guides an organization's journey from defining its mission and goals to formulating and implementing strategies. It is an ongoing, collaborative effort that enables organizations to adapt, thrive, and achieve their objectives in an ever-changing world.
Strategic Planning: Navigating the Path to Organizational Success. (2016, Dec 07). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-manager-as-a-planner-and-strategist-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
