To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Moral relativism, at first glance, presents itself as an intriguing and well-structured philosophical standpoint. It asserts that the truth of moral judgments is relative to the individual making the judgment or to the specific community involved. In essence, moral relativism posits that all moral perspectives are equally valid, with no single person's moral beliefs being inherently more right or wrong than another's. However, upon closer examination of the arguments put forth by moral relativists, it becomes evident that there are often valid objections to their claims.
Moral relativism encompasses two main categories: cultural relativism and individual relativism. Cultural relativism contends that concepts of right and wrong, good and evil, are contingent upon a particular culture and its way of life. Individual relativism, on the other hand, asserts that these moral judgments are relative to an individual's personal preferences.
Cultural relativism maintains that moral values are inherently tied to the culture in which they are embedded. In essence, what is considered morally acceptable or reprehensible varies from one culture to another.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Moral
4.7 (348)
“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”
This perspective suggests that there are no "universal moral truths" that apply universally across all societies and cultures. This viewpoint finds support in the idea that an individual's moral compass is largely shaped by their upbringing, environment, and cultural influences. For instance, children learn about right and wrong through their parents, their cultural surroundings, and how these entities react to various situations.
The theory of ethical relativism posits that ethical standards are not immutable and uniform across all societies and time periods but are, instead, contingent upon the moral standards prevailing within specific societies and eras.
However, it is crucial to critically assess this theory. While it is true that moral standards can evolve over time, it is equally vital to consider that certain ethical principles remain constant and transcendent of time and place.
One fundamental challenge to ethical relativism arises from the assertion that time and location should not alter the fundamental principles of what is morally right and wrong. Rather than placing excessive emphasis on respecting the moral norms of a given society, there should be a stronger emphasis on individual rights and universal human rights. It is essential to recognize that there exist fundamental human rights that should apply universally, regardless of cultural or temporal context. These rights serve as a foundation upon which societies must build their moral beliefs and practices. Any culture that violates these fundamental rights should not be celebrated for its uniqueness but rather criticized for failing to acknowledge the universal rights of individuals.
Ethical relativism, however, appears to prioritize the preservation of cultural diversity over the rights of individuals. For instance, in a scenario where a particular culture condones the killing or maiming of individuals for minor annoyances, ethical relativism would suggest that individuals from outside that culture should refrain from condemning such practices. This places undue emphasis on respecting cultural norms and neglects the fundamental rights of individuals, such as the right to life. In a relativistic framework, there is no universal ethical standard to which societies can be held accountable, resulting in a troubling moral vacuum where no action can be categorically labeled as moral or immoral.
Society often plays a significant role in defining what is considered moral at a given point in history. While morality can be adaptive and subject to change over time, it remains influenced by the prevailing cultural norms and values. For example, the moral view of pre-marital sex in the early twentieth century was vastly different from today's perspective. While pre-marital sex was once considered a grave sin that tarnished an individual's character, contemporary society is more accepting of individuals who engage in pre-marital sexual relationships.
Furthermore, cultural relativism is exemplified by the Eskimos' practice of infanticide and the killing of elders. Within the Eskimo culture, these actions are deemed necessary for the survival of the community due to limited resources. Ethical relativism argues that such practices, while morally objectionable in other cultures, should be respected within the Eskimo culture. However, this perspective overlooks the universality of certain ethical principles, such as the sanctity of human life. It is essential to recognize that even within our own society, conflicting views on ethical matters, such as abortion, capital punishment, and euthanasia, persist. These internal debates highlight the complexity of moral judgments even within a single culture.
Cultural relativism asserts that each society adheres to a distinct moral code shaped by its unique cultural beliefs and practices. Consequently, what may be morally acceptable in one society can be deemed morally reprehensible in another. This view rests on several key claims:
These claims form the basis of cultural relativism and its perspective on morality. It argues that moral values are context-dependent and that moral judgments should be made within the framework of a particular society's code of ethics.
One example of cultural relativism in action can be seen in the varied societal perspectives on homosexuality. In Western societies, homosexuality may be accepted, but it still faces opposition from certain religious groups, while American Indian tribes have recognized the institution of the berdache, individuals who assume the roles and occupations of the opposite gender after puberty. These individuals are considered healers and leaders in women's groups, demonstrating how diverse cultures can hold different views on moral matters.
Ruth Benedict, a prominent anthropologist, highlighted the role of cultural relativism in shaping moral values. She provided an example of a man in a Melanesian society who was referred to as "silly and simple and definitely crazy" because he exhibited a strong inclination to share, help others, and engage in kind gestures. In contrast, Western societies view such qualities as virtuous. This stark contrast illustrates how cultural relativism can lead to divergent perspectives on moral virtues and vices.
The assertion that moral codes are inherently shaped by an individual's culture and environment holds significant merit. It is undeniable that the culture in which an individual is raised significantly influences their moral beliefs and ethical judgments. As children, we learn about right and wrong through the examples set by our parents, the prevailing cultural norms, and the reactions of those around us to various situations. Our moral compass is forged through these experiences.
Furthermore, history and societal evolution play a crucial role in shaping moral codes. Practices such as sorcery, homosexuality, polygamy, male dominance, and euthanasia are all contingent upon the societal context in which they occur. These practices are not universally accepted or condemned but are instead products of their respective cultures.
While cultural relativism offers valuable insights into the diversity of moral perspectives across different societies, it is essential to strike a balance between respecting cultural differences and upholding universal human rights. The presence of fundamental human rights, such as the right to life and freedom from torture, transcends cultural boundaries and should serve as a foundation upon which all societies build their moral beliefs.
Cultural relativism should not be used as a shield to condone practices that violate these fundamental human rights. Instead, it should encourage respectful dialogue and mutual understanding among cultures while recognizing the need to address issues that infringe upon universally recognized ethical principles.
In conclusion, moral relativism, specifically cultural relativism, provides valuable insights into the diversity of moral perspectives across different societies. It challenges the notion of universal moral truths and emphasizes the role of culture and environment in shaping an individual's moral code. However, it is essential to strike a balance between respecting cultural differences and upholding fundamental human rights that transcend cultural boundaries. While societies may possess different moral codes, there exist ethical principles that should serve as a universal foundation for moral beliefs. By fostering respectful dialogue and understanding among cultures, we can navigate the complexities of moral relativism while upholding the inherent dignity and rights of all individuals.
Moral Relativism: Balancing Cultural Diversity and Universal Ethics. (2016, Dec 28). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/moral-relativism-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
