To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Happiness, an elusive yet universally sought-after ideal, forms the cornerstone of human aspirations. The eminent philosopher John Stuart Mill, a proponent of Utilitarianism, introduced the greatest happiness principle as a pathway to collective well-being. This essay delves into the contemporary relevance of Mill's principle, particularly in the contentious arena of gay marriage. By scrutinizing real-world scenarios, such as those in the United States and Ireland, we aim to unravel the complex interplay between individual actions and societal happiness.
Mill's greatest happiness principle, rooted in the philosophy of Utilitarianism, posits that the morality of actions is determined by their contribution to overall happiness.
In essence, an action is deemed right to the extent that it promotes happiness and wrong insofar as it leads to the opposite. Crucially, Mill emphasizes that this happiness transcends individual pleasure, focusing on the well-being of the community as a whole.
According to Mill, individuals must meticulously consider the consequences of their actions, weighing their potential to foster happiness within the community.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Happiness
5 (339)
“ KarrieWrites did such a phenomenal job on this assignment! He completed it prior to its deadline and was thorough and informative. ”
The underlying premise is that a series of actions aimed at creating happiness will inevitably culminate in boundless pleasure for the entire community. To explore the contemporary relevance of the greatest happiness principle, we turn our attention to a recent and highly debated topic—gay marriage.
The watershed moment of June 26, 2015, witnessed the legalization of same-sex marriage in all 50 states of the United States. A protracted battle fought in the hallowed halls of the Supreme Court for decades culminated in a revolutionary shift in American societal norms.
However, the aftermath raises questions about the application of the greatest happiness principle.
An emblematic case is that of Kim Davis, the county clerk in Kentucky, whose refusal to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples garnered national attention. Davis justified her actions by citing her religious beliefs, which she claimed impeded her ability to fulfill her professional duties. In the context of Mill's philosophy, Davis's stance exemplifies a clear violation of the greatest happiness principle.
Davis's actions, grounded in personal convictions, inadvertently resulted in the propagation of unhappiness within the community. By refusing to adhere to the newly established legal framework, she not only contravened the law but also disrupted the harmony intended to prevail within the community. Mill's argument for moral sanctions comes into play here, as Davis's internal sanction, based on religious beliefs, clashes with the overarching goal of societal happiness.
Mill, if confronted with Davis's case, would likely critique her actions, urging her to consider the broader implications of her refusal to issue marriage licenses. From Mill's perspective, an individual's personal beliefs, while acknowledged, should not override the greater good and harmony sought within society. The internal sanction, in this case, hinders the realization of the greatest happiness for the community as a whole.
Shifting our focus beyond the United States, we encounter similar dilemmas in places like Ireland, where the greatest happiness principle finds itself entangled in the discourse surrounding gay marriage. In early November, the Northern Ireland Assembly conducted a pivotal vote to determine the fate of same-sex marriage in that region.
Despite a majority vote in favor (53-51), a democratic party intervened, vetoing the decision and thwarting the community's pursuit of happiness. The Northern Ireland situation echoes Mill's concern about individual actions impeding collective goals. The veto, driven by individualized interests rather than communal well-being, stands as a testament to the challenges in applying the greatest happiness principle on a global scale.
Mill, observing such situations, would likely question why individual actions override the collective pursuit of happiness. He would emphasize the importance of collaboration and working towards common goals, positing that conflicts arising from individual decisions lead to pain and, ultimately, unhappiness within a community.
The Northern Ireland case exemplifies how individual decisions, driven by political or personal motives, can disrupt the delicate balance necessary for societal happiness. Mill's philosophy encourages a paradigm shift, wherein the community's thoughts and aspirations take precedence over individual convictions, fostering a harmonious coexistence and contributing to the overall happiness of the populace.
Endorsing Mill's greatest happiness principle in today's society requires a unique blend of courage and selflessness. It entails placing the thoughts and actions of others before one's own in pursuit of the ultimate happiness level. Aligning personal values with societal goals, as advocated by Mill, forms the crux of this endorsement.
The interconnectedness of internal and external sanctions plays a pivotal role in achieving the greatest happiness principle. If an individual's internal values align with external societal goals, a sense of peace ensues, creating an environment conducive to the happiness of all. This alignment, reflecting the harmony between personal beliefs and communal aspirations, serves as a catalyst for the pursuit of happiness at both individual and collective levels.
In conclusion, John Stuart Mill's greatest happiness principle retains its relevance in contemporary society, especially when applied to the complex landscape of gay marriage. The intricate interplay between individual actions and societal well-being necessitates a thoughtful consideration of the consequences of our decisions. In a world fraught with challenges and differing perspectives, Mill's principle stands as a timeless guide to achieving the ultimate goal of happiness for all.
Mill's Greatest Happiness Principle in the Context of Gay Marriage. (2021, Oct 05). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/john-stuart-mill-s-views-on-happiness-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
