24/7 writing help on your phone
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The impact of media on societal perceptions and behaviors has been a subject of scholarly exploration for decades. One such insightful investigation is presented in Sarah Nilsen's article, "Be Sure You're Right, Then Go Ahead": The Davy Crockett Gun Craze. Nilsen, a distinguished professor at the University of Vermont specializing in the history of television and film, delves into the influential role of the Davy Crockett cartoon series in shaping attitudes toward guns in the 1950s. This essay endeavors to provide an in-depth analysis of Nilsen's arguments, presenting additional perspectives and supporting evidence to enrich the discourse.
Nilsen contends that the Davy Crockett cartoon series, produced by Disney in the 1950s, played a pivotal role in altering perceptions of guns, especially among younger viewers. An intriguing aspect of her argument is the contradiction within Disney's own narrative. She astutely highlights Disney's earlier production, Bambi, in 1942, which conveyed an "anti-hunting and anti-gun" message. However, approximately a decade later, Disney seemingly reversed its stance with Davy Crockett, where the gun became the "center of his image and message" (Nilsen 3).
This contradiction raises questions about the ethical responsibility of media conglomerates and their impact on societal values. By juxtaposing these Disney productions, Nilsen prompts readers to critically examine the potential consequences of such mixed messaging on the audience, particularly impressionable children. The power dynamics between media producers and consumers are intricately woven into the fabric of societal norms, and Nilsen's exploration of this phenomenon opens avenues for further scholarly inquiry.
Nilsen reinforces her argument by citing real-life instances where children exhibited a desensitization to guns, attributing it to the influence of shows like Davy Crockett. The anecdote of a six-year-old in Brooklyn, New York, requesting real bullets to make his sister "die for real" underscores the profound impact media can have on shaping children's perceptions (Nilsen 4). The stark contrast between this chilling request and the innocence of childhood raises ethical concerns about the potential repercussions of media content on impressionable minds.
This desensitization, as illuminated by Nilsen, goes beyond the immediate context of play and extends to the normalization of guns in society. When firearms are portrayed as toys, the boundaries between fiction and reality blur, potentially compromising public safety. Nilsen's analysis serves as a cautionary tale, urging society to critically assess the long-term implications of media representations on behaviors and attitudes toward firearms.
Media theorist Daniel Dayan's assertion that "ideology is hidden in our very eyes" becomes a linchpin in Nilsen's argument (Nilsen 2). By incorporating this quote, she invites readers to reflect on the subtle ways in which media can shape ideological perspectives. Nilsen contends that the Davy Crockett series, despite its seemingly innocuous nature, subtly conveys an ideology that contradicts its overt messages. This ideological undercurrent, as revealed by Nilsen, exemplifies the nuanced and often subliminal influence that media exerts on collective consciousness.
The utilization of quotes from media theorists, such as Dayan, enhances the scholarly rigor of Nilsen's article. By grounding her analysis in established theoretical frameworks, she establishes a solid foundation for her arguments, reinforcing the credibility of her insights. This nuanced approach distinguishes Nilsen's work as a scholarly contribution that extends beyond mere observation, delving into the theoretical underpinnings of media influence.
In conclusion, Sarah Nilsen's article stands as a commendable exploration of the Davy Crockett gun craze and its implications on societal attitudes toward firearms. Through a judicious combination of examples, anecdotes, and theoretical insights, Nilsen presents a compelling case for the profound influence of media on shaping perceptions and behaviors. This essay has sought to expand on Nilsen's work by offering additional perspectives and emphasizing the broader implications of media influence on societal values.
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.get help with your assignment