To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Dramatic irony is when the audience knows about certain events that the character in the play doesn’t know about. In an inspector calls Mr Birling is introduced and makes claims such as “The titanic…unsinkable , absolutely unsinkable” and “I say there isn’t a chance of war” . The audience of the time would be extremely outraged at Mr Birling’s ignorance and form a hatred for him . This was Priestley’s intention. The audience of 1945 may have lost a family member of friend in the titanic , they could have been offended by Mr Birling’s comments.
Mr Birling’s understanding of reality is flawed as he doesn’t think there will be a war but in 1914 the world war 1 begins.
The audience believe that Mr Birling is clueless because of the statements. Priestley was a socialist , he believes that capitalism should be abolished and socialism would be brought in. Mr Birling is a capitalist and Priestley portrayed him as a fool.
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
Priestley does not want the audience to believe in capitalism .
In what ways is Eva Smith exploited?
Eva Smith is exploited by the upper class as there was a lack of respect from the upper class to the lower class.
In 1912 , there was a lack of respect and equal rights for the lower class. This was because of the capitalist system that was implemented in at the time. Mr Birling represents capitalism , this was Priestley’s intention. Priestley wanted the audience to understand they were exploited the lower class and they’d eventually gain a social conscience, just as Shelia Birling did.
Mr Birling exploits Eva Smith as he uses the fact that she was desperate need of money to make her work at a low wage .
Eva Smith forms a protest for better wages , which leads to employees striking. It was likely that Eva Smith felt powerful and like she had made a serious impact. Instead Mr Birling had no intention of rising the wages but he was going to wait for the employees to come , he knew that they would as they needed the money and then fired the ring leaders . This gave Eva Smith false hope , she was extremely vulnerable at the time and Mr Birling took advantage of her weakness . He refuses to take the blame for her exploitation as he says ‘Still I cant take any responsibility’ , creating the impression that he had thought this was her fault.
Shelia Birling says ‘But there girls aren’t cheap labour, they are people’ , near the beginning of the play before she tells her story. This gives the audience the impression that she wouldn’t be the type to exploit anyone. Priestley wanted Shelia to look innocent so there would be an element of surprise when she told her story. Shelia exploits Eva Smith as she uses her power that she has because she is the upper class to get Eva Smith fired. Eva Smith did nothing wrong but because she was of the lower class , she didn’t get to explain her side of the story. She was just fired as that was the quickest and easiest option for the employer.
Taking all the previous points into consideration , I believe Eva Smith was exploited by 3 main characters which are Shelia, Eric and Mr Birling. They exploited her as Mr Birling has more power and money than her.. This made her extremely vulnerable.
The extract is from page 47 starting 'MRS B: I'm sorry she should have come to such a horrible end. But I accept no blame for this at all'
In this extract, JB Priestley builds drama and tension through the use of dramatic irony. Mrs Birling does not realise until the very end of the scene that her own son is responsible for Eva Smith's pregnancy. However, Sheila and the audience begin to realise this before her. So, when she says things like 'I blame the young man of the child she was going to have', we realise that she is unknowingly incriminating herself and her son. This makes it tense and exciting, because we want to see what will happen when she eventually does realise that the person she is being so harsh on is her own son.
In this extract, JB Priestley also builds up drama and tension through having Sheila realise the truth of the situation long before her mother. Sheila is constantly interrupting trying to explain to her mother that by blaming the father of the child she is only blaming her own son. For example, she says 'Mother-stop-stop!' and 'But don't you see-' As well as her words, the stage directions show that she is getting increasingly 'agitated' and 'hysterical' in attempting to warn her mother about what is happening.
This is very tense and dramatic because Mr and Mrs Birling misinterpret her words and just assume that she is overexcited; this is consolidated through the use of imperatives, which connotes Sheila's desperation to be listened to. They assume she is being silly, when in fact she is the closest of all of the Birling family to true insight at this point.
Why has Priestley used dramatic irony in Mr Birling’s speech?. (2017, Nov 06). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/why-has-priestley-used-dramatic-irony-in-mr-birlings-speech-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
