To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
The debate over who is the superior hunter between General Zaroff and Sanger Rainsford in Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" has intrigued readers for years. While some argue that Rainsford's victory in the deadly game makes him the dominant hunter, it is essential to examine the various aspects of hunting intelligence, skills, and attitudes towards animals to determine the true master of the hunt. This essay delves into the evidence presented in the story to demonstrate that General Zaroff is, in fact, the superior hunter.
One of the key factors in hunting is intelligence, encompassing the ability to strategize, hide, and reason effectively.
Zaroff's cunning intellect is apparent throughout the story. He set up traps, such as misleading signs that indicated nonexistent channels, as mentioned on page 21. This demonstrates his ability to outwit and outmaneuver his prey, a crucial skill for a proficient hunter.
Furthermore, Zaroff's decision to allow Rainsford to live, even when he had the opportunity to end the game, speaks volumes about his hunting intelligence.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Human Nature
4.7 (348)
“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”
As Zaroff remarks, "I have grown rather bored of hunting animals with no ability to reason." This statement reveals his desire for a more challenging hunt, one that requires his prey to possess higher intelligence and reasoning skills.
Exceptional marksmanship and overall hunting skill are essential attributes for a great hunter. Zaroff's prowess is evident when he recounts shooting his father's prized turkeys as a child. His father did not scold him but instead complimented him on his marksmanship, as indicated on page 18. This early recognition of his talent suggests that Zaroff was destined to become a skilled hunter.
Furthermore, Zaroff's ability to hunt dangerous animals without feeling the thrill of the hunt waning showcases his superior skill.
On page 19, he states, "I wondered why the hunt no longer fascinated me." This sentiment highlights the fact that Zaroff has mastered hunting to the point where it no longer poses a challenge for him, a testament to his exceptional skill.
One's attitude towards animals reveals their care and respect for the creatures they hunt. Zaroff's perspective on animals is multifaceted. On one hand, he displays a lack of regard for animals he deems unworthy, as exemplified when he says, "The animal had nothing but its legs and its instinct" on page 21. This attitude reflects his view that some animals are mere prey and hold no value beyond being a potential meal.
However, Zaroff's attitude shifts when it comes to animals he considers worthy. He recalls a hunt where he killed a man, whom he deemed stupid, but he mourned the loss of "The finest hound in my pack," as mentioned on page 25. This demonstrates that Zaroff values animals that serve a purpose beyond being hunted for sport. It adds depth to his character and illustrates the complexity of his relationship with the animal kingdom.
While Rainsford's victory in the deadly game may suggest his prowess as a hunter, a closer examination of the story's evidence reveals that General Zaroff is the superior hunter. Zaroff's hunting intelligence, skill, and nuanced attitude towards animals set him apart as the true master of the hunt. His ability to outthink, outmaneuver, and appreciate the value of his prey makes him a formidable and unmatched hunter in the world of "The Most Dangerous Game."
Zaroff vs. Rainsford: A Battle of Hunting Prowess. (2017, May 21). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/rainsford-or-zaroff-who-is-the-better-hunter-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
