To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Ferdinand Marcos, the former President of the Philippines, is a figure who continues to evoke strong and divided opinions. His rule, which lasted for over two decades, is marked by a complex legacy that includes both accomplishments and controversies. In this essay, we will undertake a critical examination of Ferdinand Marcos's presidency, weighing his achievements against the criticisms and examining the impact of his rule on the Philippines.
Ferdinand Marcos was elected as the President of the Philippines in 1965, following a promising start to his political career as a decorated war hero.
His initial years in office were characterized by economic growth, infrastructural development, and efforts to strengthen the country's international relations.
Marcos's administration initiated ambitious infrastructure projects, including the construction of roads, bridges, and public buildings. His "Build, Build, Build" program aimed to modernize the country's infrastructure, which was seen as a positive step toward progress.
However, one of the most contentious aspects of Marcos's presidency was his declaration of martial law in 1972. This move suspended civil liberties, dissolved the existing constitution, and concentrated power in the hands of the executive.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Philippine Government
5 (876)
“ Have been using her for a while and please believe when I tell you, she never fail. Thanks Writer Lyla you are indeed awesome ”
While Marcos argued that martial law was necessary to quell communist insurgency and maintain law and order, it also resulted in widespread human rights abuses, censorship of the media, and political repression.
Moreover, the extended period of authoritarian rule under martial law allowed Marcos to consolidate power and extend his presidency beyond the constitutionally mandated two terms.
Critics argue that this undermined the democratic institutions of the Philippines and perpetuated a culture of political dynasty, corruption, and cronyism.
On the economic front, Ferdinand Marcos implemented policies that led to notable achievements during his presidency. The Philippines experienced economic growth, infrastructure development, and increased foreign investments. Marcos's administration sought to reduce poverty and improve living standards for Filipinos.
However, the economic progress during his rule was not without its share of controversies. The massive external debt incurred under Marcos's administration raised concerns about the sustainability of the country's finances. Moreover, allegations of corruption, embezzlement of public funds, and amassing ill-gotten wealth tainted his legacy.
One of the darkest chapters of Ferdinand Marcos's presidency is the legacy of martial law and human rights abuses. During this period, activists, political opponents, and ordinary citizens were subject to arbitrary arrest, torture, and extrajudicial killings. The government's crackdown on dissent cast a long shadow over the country's history, leaving scars that continue to be felt today.
Furthermore, the ill-gotten wealth amassed by the Marcos family and their associates remains a subject of controversy and legal battles. Billions of dollars in assets were allegedly stolen from the Philippine treasury, and efforts to recover these assets continue to this day.
Ferdinand Marcos's presidency came to an end in 1986 following the People Power Revolution, a peaceful uprising that forced him into exile. His departure marked the end of authoritarian rule and the beginning of a return to democratic governance in the Philippines.
Today, opinions on Ferdinand Marcos's legacy remain deeply polarized. Some argue that his achievements in infrastructure and economic growth should not be overlooked, while others emphasize the enduring impact of martial law and human rights abuses. The question of whether he was a good president is one that continues to be fiercely debated in the Philippines and beyond.
In conclusion, assessing Ferdinand Marcos's presidency is a complex undertaking. While his administration achieved certain economic and infrastructural milestones, these accomplishments are weighed against allegations of corruption, authoritarian rule, and widespread human rights abuses under martial law.
Whether Ferdinand Marcos is considered a good president depends on one's perspective and the relative importance placed on his positive achievements versus the negative aspects of his rule. Ultimately, the legacy of Ferdinand Marcos is a topic that invites ongoing debate, reflecting the complexity of his time in office and its enduring impact on the Philippines.
Is Ferdinand Marcos a Good President. (2024, Feb 25). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/is-ferdinand-marcos-a-good-president-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
