Functionalist Perspectives on Family: Murdock and Parsons

The functionalist perspective has long been concerned with understanding the role of the family within society and its impact on individual members. Specifically, it explores how the family institution contributes to maintaining order and stability in society, as well as its significance for the well-being of its individual members. Two prominent functionalist views on the family are those of George Murdock and Talcott Parsons, each offering distinctive insights into the functions of the family.

Murdock's Functionalism

George Murdock's functionalist view centers on four fundamental functions of the family: the 'sexual,' 'reproductive,' 'economic,' and 'educational' functions.

The 'sexual' function involves the regulation of sexual activity within the family unit. Murdock argues that the family fulfills the sexual needs of its adult members while simultaneously establishing societal norms regarding sexual conduct outside of marriage. This regulation, according to Murdock, contributes to social stability.

The 'reproductive' function pertains to the bearing and raising of children, a concept integral to Murdock's framework.

Get quality help now

Doctor Jennifer

Verified writer

Proficient in: Family

5 (893)

“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

The family, in Murdock's view, not only provides society with new members but also assumes the crucial responsibility of nurturing and socializing them. Additionally, Murdock emphasizes the family as an 'economic' unit, characterized by a division of labor along gender lines. This division, according to Murdock, strengthens spousal bonds as they engage in distinct yet complementary work.

Furthermore, Murdock introduces the 'educational' function, synonymous with 'socialization.' This function involves the transmission of societal norms, values, and ways of life to younger family members. Murdock posits that this role is essential for societal survival, as a lack of cultural continuity could disrupt stability.

Parsons later echoed this sentiment, endorsing the idea that the family plays a pivotal role in shaping individuals through primary socialization.

Parsons' Two Basic Functions

Talcott Parsons, another influential figure in functionalist sociology, identifies two 'basic and irreducible' functions of the family: primary socialization of children and the stabilization of adult personalities within society. Primary socialization, occurring in early childhood, is a process in which the family plays a crucial role. Parsons argues that while other institutions, such as schools and peer groups, become influential during secondary socialization, the family's impact during primary socialization is unparalleled.

During primary socialization, the family achieves two critical tasks. Firstly, it must transmit the culture of society to children, ensuring not only an understanding of societal norms and values but also their internalization. This internalization process integrates these cultural elements into the child's identity. Parsons contends that the family's role in primary socialization is indispensable for shaping individuals capable of functioning within societal norms.

Additionally, Parsons proposes that the family has the function of 'stabilizing the personality' of its adult members. Family life, according to Parsons, provides emotional security for adults. The roles assigned to parents offer opportunities for adults to express and fulfill their emotional needs through their children. This emotional stability, Parsons argues, contributes to the overall stability of the societal structure.

Comparative Analysis and Critique

While Murdock and Parsons share a functionalist perspective on the family, some differences exist in their emphasis and interpretation of certain functions. Murdock places significant importance on the economic function of the family, highlighting the division of labor as a source of strength. In contrast, Parsons elevates the emotional and psychological aspects, emphasizing the family's role in providing stability through primary socialization and personality stabilization.

However, critics argue that functionalism tends to oversimplify the complexity of family dynamics and roles. It often neglects the diversity of family structures and the evolving nature of societal norms. For instance, Murdock's division of labor along gender lines may be seen as outdated in contemporary societies where gender roles are continually being redefined.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the functionalist perspectives of George Murdock and Talcott Parsons provide valuable insights into the functions of the family within society. Murdock's emphasis on the economic and reproductive functions, coupled with Parsons' focus on primary socialization and personality stabilization, collectively contribute to our understanding of the family's role in maintaining societal order and individual well-being. However, it is essential to recognize the limitations of functionalism and consider alternative perspectives that account for the complexities and variations in family structures and societal norms.