To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
When a doctor or physician assists or suggest euthanasia to his patient, it sends a perilous message to society or public that dying solves life’s problems to someone who is suffering from an illness whether it is mentally or physically ranging from less or curable illness to terminal or life threatening illness. There’s always a probability that a doctor’s diagnosis/assumption could be wrong as a doctor himself is not perfect and can make mistakes. What if the doctor makes a wrong diagnosis, and the patient is not suffering from a life threating illness?
What if the prognosis is wrong and the patient will not die quickly or even if it is correct, it's unnecessary that the patient will die.
He can get better and live a little longer. What if the patient does not receive a proper health care and the suffering could increase? So suggesting euthanasia for a patient is completely wrong. Doctor’s purpose and job is to do the very best in healing the patient until his time really comes up and dies naturally.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Assisted Suicide
4.8 (309)
“ Writer-marian did a very good job with my paper, she got straight to the point, she made it clear and organized ”
If voluntary euthanasia is legalized in countries, it will be used in wrong ways such as it will lead to the legalization of involuntary euthanasia. People can abuse their or others right to this process.
People who are disabled (cannot be taken care of) and old aged (who are difficult to look after) can be given up to Euthanasia by their family members or requested by the person himself. This can increase the suicide rate in some countries.
Doctors could use this involuntary euthanasia and end up killing their patients to free hospital beds or to save money. So euthanasia leads to the decline of care to the terminally ill patients. This is morally and ethically wrong and will stir up injustice in society. It is also very common for a person who is suffering or is in pain to think about dying. The physical suffering or pain, which he is in, takes a psychological toll on his mind. It is a short period that a patient goes through in which he sometimes feel worthless or a burden to his family member’s or questions or thinks that" it is better to die than to live in this misery or suffer in this illness.' But this does not mean that he actually wants to die.
As it is known, that Science has advanced than before and is still advancing so some medicines or drugs can be made or given to a person who is suffering from an incurable disease or terminal illness. Other type of support should be provided such as proper palliative care (special medical care) to help relieve the patient from both physical and mental suffering. If palliative care is available to the patient his life will become easy in a way as to relieve them from their discomfort.
As of emotional support which cannot be given from medicines but can be provided by the effective palliative care which can go a long way to make the patient’s last journey of life less stressful. It will give him and his loved ones a chance to spend quality time together and make last memories which can let him die in peace. So suggesting Euthanasia is not needed at all. Ending someone’s life to relieve them from their suffering is murder or homicide or if it is requested by the person himself is known as suicide or it is suggested by the physician himself then it is Physician Assisted Suicide (PAS).
If we look from the sight of religion than it is a great sin. God has created human beings and inserted soul in their bodies. It is rightfully his choice whether to take away life from someone or give a chance to live more and we are in no position or nobody to dwell or interfere in his matter and dealings. God has planned for each person and has a purpose for everything. Then we have no right to kill ourselves or someone else by carrying out the process of Euthanasia. One of the great philosopher’s Immanuel Kant opposes Euthanasia and does not agree that it should be encouraged as according to him man is a rational being so he has no right to plan such a maxim like "If I am in a state of suffering or in a terrible condition that I have the right to end my life or give this right to either the doctor or my family".
Kant furthermore proposes that if humanity is an end, meaning it will come to an end one day that no person has the right to take his life even in whatever condition he is.A man must act according to ways in which he does not disrespect other human beings or himself and if he acts in this way, then he is degrading or devaluing not only himself but others as well through choosing euthanasia is against the intrinsic values and personal dignity.
Even if euthanasia can bring a very few advantages, I still strongly oppose this phenomenon and believe that it shouldn’t be encouraged and allowed and considered illegal everywhere As to my opinion, it’s not moral or ethical at all to take away the life of someone even if they are seriously ill or suffering because every person regardless of age, gender, religion, status and race may live or should be given a chance to live and see his life till he naturally dies.
Euthanasia and Physician Assisted Suicide. (2020, May 01). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/euthanasia-and-physician-assisted-suicide-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
