Now Accepting Apple Pay

Apple Pay is the easiest and most secure way to pay on StudyMoose in Safari.

Conservative writer John Leo’s essay “Free Query? Not On School” appears to shoot itself in the foot from the very start, hinging the totality of his argument on what kinds of speech censored (directly or indirectly) by colleges and universities would be allowed off of school, according to the First Change. He presumes as to smugly note that this censorship is a reason for trainees being more politically apathetic. However, much of his examples are in fact from trainees themselves, from paper censorship to battering the friend of hate speech activists.

In this sense, the students are politically active … they just not batting for Leo’s side. Regardless of his invocation of the First Amendment, Leo does not seem to think about the Statement of Self-reliance, and how it would factor into his hypothetical argument. Incidentally, his argument is hypothetical because universities, like other companies, have some measure of control over who speaks or marches … Costs from Accounting would still be screaming about the First Modification when he is fired for his loud speech about the evils of immigrants.

Get quality help now
Dr. Karlyna PhD
Verified writer

Proficient in: Abuse

4.7 (235)

“ Amazing writer! I am really satisfied with her work. An excellent price as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

This example is not far from Leo’s reality, as one of his examples is students shutting down a speech by a member of the Minutement, a self-appointed task force who try to patrol the border themselves. Arguably, these individuals are committed to depriving others of their pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness, and are doing so by forming a vigilante mob that avoids the very federal government that Leo wishes would in some way intervene and permit them to speak.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Check writers' offers

You won’t be charged yet!

These are some of the circumstances that, at a governmental level, are simply trigger for a disobedience.

However, individuals are not governments…a simple fact that seems to elude Leo, as he assumes that every college that tries to prevent the inevitable riot from a hatemonger’s speech simply must be colluding with Congress to abridge the freedom of speech of said hatemongers. That the college might actually be attempting to preserve the life and liberty of its students seems the furthest thing from his mind. Perhaps most tellingly, Leo considers sexual harassment and discrimination as cases built simply built on hurt feelings, and thinks that any passionate discussion of ideals would invariably incorporate denigrating comments.

He zealously attacks concepts such as Affirmative Action without acknowledging that those policies owe their inception to the part of the Constitution that he doesn’t mention: the part that considered blacks to count as one third of a white person. He lauds conservative bake sales that charge less for women and minorities as ways of sticking it to the authorities, and seems to find it inconceivable that a horribly condescending reminder of racial inequity throughout the ages might constitute a form of harassment.

According to the Declaration of Independence, what necessitates rebellion is “a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism. ” Leo’s examples are rife with messages and speakers that are deliberately offensive to women and minorities, and perversely seems to see these as conservatism striking back at liberal control. Yet the conservative viewpoint, as imagined by Leo, truly does amount to endless abuses intended to (again, quite tellingly) put women and minorities in their place.

If such actions are enough to warrant bloody rebellion, surely students yelling really loudly or setting off fire alarms to cut off hate speech means that the conservative “victims” got off lightly? Leo’s reverence for the Constitution is rooted in the idea of it as a civilizing force that created the greatest nation in the world; hopefully, it is only a matter of time when he realizes that the aftereffect of civilization is being civilized, and will stop shaking his head wondering why these mean liberals won’t let him offend women and minorities as much as he wishes to.

Cite this page

Censorship or Freedom Of Speech. (2016, Sep 21). Retrieved from

Censorship or Freedom Of Speech

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment