To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Truth is a profound entity, akin to a challenging deer to hunt, as stated by John's father: "If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth. It was not idly that our fathers forbade the Dead Places."
Truth, an essential element for individuals, holds the power to either enlighten or devastate, contingent on its application. John's father's quote can be dissected into three pivotal segments, each unveiling distinct dimensions of its significance. These segments encompass the notions that "Truth is a hard deer to hunt," "If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth," and "It was not idly that our fathers forbade the Dead Places."
Examining the initial assertion, "Truth is a hard deer to hunt," prompts an exploration of its literal meaning — the challenge in discovering truth.
The question surfaces: is this difficulty rooted in physicality or comprehension? Contrary to a mere physical quest, the complexity lies in mentally grasping the truth.
For instance, John's journey to the Dead Places illustrates the physical challenge, while his revelation about the dead god's true nature exemplifies the mental intricacy. The crux lies in the difficulty people face in accepting the truth without concrete evidence or mental reassurance, mirroring the metaphorical complexity of hunting a hard-to-reach deer.
This brings us to the subsequent proclamation, "If you eat too much truth at once, you may die of the truth." This statement underscores the perilous nature of truth. It intertwines with the previous assertion, suggesting that once truth is comprehended, the ensuing reaction becomes crucial.
Positive outcomes arise if the truth is favorable, yet negativity prevails if the truth proves unfavorable. In the context of John and his people, the truth lies in neither goodness nor malevolence; rather, it signifies divergence. Their reaction to the truth could either elevate them or lead to their demise, echoing the gods' destructive path.
The likelihood leans towards the latter due to the incongruence between the truth and the beliefs of the hill people. When a concept clashes with one's beliefs, acceptance becomes a challenge. In this scenario, the hill people may struggle to reconcile their gods being mere mortals and may succumb to confusion between reality and religion. Additionally, the revelation of advanced godly technology may either be harnessed productively or result in self-inflicted chaos, akin to the gods' fate.
This culminates in the concluding assertion, "It was not idly that our fathers forbade the Dead Places." This suggests that the fathers had a purpose in prohibiting access to the Dead Places — a precautionary measure to safeguard their people from the unknown and the potentially destructive truth. The fathers foresaw the peril of imparting the gods' technology and weaponry to the hill people, anticipating the potential for chaos and devastation, akin to the gods' downfall. In their bid to protect their community, the fathers established rules and customs, albeit leaving their people in the dark.
However, I find myself at odds with this implication, rejecting the notion of withholding truth. Leaders, even with good intentions of societal protection, should prioritize transparency. Restricting knowledge to a single perspective neglects the potential benefits of shared wisdom. The fathers could have chosen to enlighten their people, enabling them to learn from the past instead of shutting it out.
John, a priest and the son of a priest, emerges as a dissenting figure who defies this norm. His quest for knowledge about the past civilization and its mistakes positions him as a leader with a unique perspective. John's understanding of these past errors becomes a cornerstone for his leadership, illustrating how a civilization can be constructed to endure. His realization that the city's builders were men, not gods, solidifies the importance of learning from the past. John's conviction to rebuild reflects a belief that transcends the imposed restrictions, fostering progress, removing barriers from his people's lives, and instilling a thirst for knowledge that promises improvement rather than regression.
The Significance of Truth: An Analysis of John's Father's Quote. (2016, Jul 06). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/by-the-waters-of-babylon-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment