Generally, communities have broadcast the improvements taking place in this big union, showing the average American’s abilities to make change, and supports the image associated with the ‘land of the free.’ Although, as awesome it may seem, more damage and loss of social, cultural, and racial is normally take place daily, effectively deceiving all viewers. These issues may even be installed by anyone’s sense of comfort and familiarity, separating themselves from those who have clear differences.
Among self-segregation, government discrimination still grows throughout the country, that forms a barrier around the people’s means. In this argument a solution that may hold the key to society’s differences. With a positive mindset and a passionate attitude to support, an individual may break through this thick wall by taking action and presuming for change. Furthermore, the differences have divided society on a social, political, and financial levels, which can be resolved through lawful action and universal acknowledgement.
Diversification, as it seems to be carried throughout schools, still has not fully gone away in society. Administrators encourage clubs and organizations that solely focus on one ethnic group, speaking about the need for students to find confidence and pride in their identity. As this may seem beneficial, it introduces self-segregation at an early age. Self-segregation is an issue that spreads, shaping views and opinions for future generations. Results of this timely concern includes an individual’s unwillingness to expand their horizons and associate with those of different social groups.
Danah Boyd’s essay, ‘Why America Is Self-Segregating,’ gives a smart view on this concern, telling us how people are more likely to identify with ”safe spaces’ and ‘cultural fit’ when approaching unfamiliar places. Behavior as such renders society useless when faced with diverse issues or topics. In the exposition, ‘Minority Clubs: Segregation or Integration,’ Gabriela Moro further addresses the broad solution stated above, discussing how a balance is needed to ‘support minorities and avoid segregation’ between these groups and the rest of the student body. This statement spells out a compromise between the two opinions by allowing cultural groups to proceed with their practices, but stops them from discouraging others who may not share the same ethnicity from participating. Finding this sweet spot is the first step towards a unified society.
Another form of discrimination has interfered with society as the middle and lower socioeconomic classes are suffering at the hands of the unfair American government. Due to the lack of financially support or past hardship, the government is more likely criminalize those who live in poverty, effectively separating society of the haves and the have-nots. Joseph E. Stiglitz’s paper, ‘A Tax System Stacked against the 99 Percent,’ directly discusses the biases that have led to the ‘highest income inequality and the least equality of opportunity’ seen in this country. He manages to elaborate on this next issue when describing the special treatment that those of higher standings receive compared to citizens who struggle to make a living each day. These ideals correspond with Michelle Alexander’s in her essay, ‘The New Jim Crow,’ as she identifies the problems between modern criminal regulations and the Jim Crow laws of the past. She also expresses her opinion on the unjust discrimination between the upper and working classes, trying to bring her beliefs and solutions to this universal issue. She plead how an individual’s ‘class reflects on one’s character,’ restating how anyone’s financial or racial identification may be the cause for the mistreatment and discrimination displayed by the government. The two authors share a common solution, both believing that the explosion of these issues begins with an alarming conversation to kick start a system built on equality.
In order to fix these issues, society needs to be willing to take charge and apply some action. As the writers above have shared their views on the issues that divide common communities, they have informed their readers about issues they believe are most important, but failed to give them a feasible plan. Barack Obama’s, ‘Howard University Commencement Speech,’ encourages everyone to take a stand for their beliefs, carefully acknowledging the importance of action in change. He continues with this point when sharing how ‘awareness is not enough; it requires changes in law’ to fix the injustice discussed.
Meanwhile, he goes on about the importance of accountability in these circumstances, describing how those who are strong enough to face the harsh obstacles in life will succeed in making society better. Similar to J.D. Vance experiences in his essay, ‘Hillbilly Elegy,’ as he shares how confidence has motivated him to take control over his life and anything that may get in his way. Vance continues by expressing how alone he felt since he does fit the picture of the average working-class white American, and how he refuses to agree with their down plays ‘will to work for a better life’. He gives the readers a realistic view of this issue, hinting at the sad viewpoints commonly seen in this socioeconomic group. Vance’s goal is to make his audience aware of the power of confidence and how it leads to change in every setting possible.
Therefore, to seal the gap that separates society into groups and subcategories, communities must come together and participate in action-filled events to positively reinforce the issues addressed. Society must harmonize and find a common ground to stand on together, as a unified front. Americans must put aside segregator and discriminatory views to become a union of equality and justice. Everyone has to recognize the importance of taking a stand for what one believes in, coming together to create a fair society. One where race should not determine anyone’s living conditions or government treatment, nor should an individual’s financial status demonstrate their need to abide by the laws. This will be the beginning of the bridging of all societal differences.
Work Cited Page
Alexander, Michelle. ‘The New Jim Crow.’ “They Say / I Say”: the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff et al., W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 230-250.
Boyd, Danah. ‘Why America Is Self-Segregating.’ “They Say / I Say”: the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff et al., W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 219-228.
Moro, Gabriela. ‘Minority Student Clubs: Segregation or Integration?’ “They Say / I Say”: the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff et al., W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 269-278.
Obama, Barack. ‘Howard University Commencement Speech.’ “They Say / I Say”: the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff et al., W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 296-313.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. ‘A Tax System Stacked Against 99 Percent.’ “They Say / I Say”: the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff et al., W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 286-295.
Vance, J.D. ‘Hillbilly Elegy.’ “They Say / I Say”: the Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, by Gerald Graff et al., W.W. Norton & Company, 2018, pp. 251-265.
Cite this essay
Americans Communities: Union of Equality and Justice. (2019, Dec 13). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/americans-communities-union-of-equality-and-justice-essay