The Complexity of Lies in Stephanie Ericsson's "The Ways We Lie"

Introduction

Lies have woven themselves into the fabric of our daily lives, often without conscious acknowledgment. Stephanie Ericsson's essay, "The Ways We Lie," delves into the multifaceted nature of lying, exploring what constitutes a lie, the motivations behind lying, justifications for lies, and the far-reaching consequences they entail. In her essay, Ericsson unveils the intricate web of deception that underlies human interactions and prompts readers to reflect on the ethical implications of lying.

The Definition of Lies

Ericsson begins her exploration by presenting two definitions of a lie from Webster's dictionary: "1.

A false statement or action especially made with the intent to deceive and 2. Anything that gives or is meant to give a false impression" (The Bedford Reader, Page 408). She posits that lies, in various forms, permeate our lives and are often deemed acceptable. In essence, lies are an integral part of human existence, making their complete eradication virtually impossible.

Ericsson delves into various types of lies, starting with the "white lie.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

Proficient in: Human Nature

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

" This type of lie involves telling an untruth to spare someone's feelings or prevent harm. The white lie is a delicate balance between protecting others and maintaining a sense of honesty. It may alleviate immediate discomfort, but it can also have unforeseen consequences, as exemplified by the Vietnam case she discusses. While it prevented families from starving, it also trapped them in a cycle of false hope, hindering their ability to move forward.

Another category of lies is the "out-and-out-lie," characterized by its blatant and unequivocal nature. Ericsson appreciates this type of lie for its straightforwardness, as it leaves no room for ambiguity.

However, it is also the easiest to identify and confront, making it a less practical choice for those seeking to deceive.

Ericsson also explores the concept of a "facade," where individuals create a false persona or undertake deceptive actions to manipulate others' perceptions. Facades are often used to seduce or impress others, but they ultimately distance individuals from authenticity and create a theatrical illusion of reality. Ericsson shares a personal experience of betrayal by a friend who maintained a facade, highlighting the destructive nature of such lies.

The Motivations Behind Lies

Ericsson delves into the motivations that drive individuals to lie. One of the most common reasons is to spare others from hurt or discomfort. The infamous "I did it to spare their feelings" excuse is frequently used to justify lies, particularly white lies. However, lying to protect oneself from the consequences of one's actions is equally prevalent. Avoiding confrontations, evading punishment, and shielding oneself from the harsh realities of life are all factors that contribute to the proliferation of lies.

Ericsson provides personal anecdotes to illustrate these motivations. She recounts how, after a difficult day, she responded with a positive façade to avoid burdening her partner further. This exemplifies the human tendency to lie to maintain harmony and avoid unnecessary conflicts in personal relationships. Similarly, individuals often resort to lies to escape the consequences of their actions, especially when economic problems loom large.

Lies of omission, where individuals withhold information deliberately, are another facet of deception that Ericsson discusses. She emphasizes the potential harm caused by omissions, highlighting that omitting crucial information can be as damaging as an outright lie. Ericsson reflects on how ancient legends regarding another woman in the Garden of Eden before Eve illustrate the dangers of omitting information, emphasizing the significance of full disclosure.

Justifications for Lies

Ericsson argues that every lie has a rationale behind it. Lies are often employed as a shield to evade consequences or protect oneself from harm. She observes, "We exaggerate, we minimize, we avoid confrontation, we spare people's feelings, we conveniently forget, we keep secrets, we justify lying to the big-guy institutions" (The Bedford Reader, Page 408). These justifications provide individuals with a sense of moral validation for their deceptive actions.

One of the primary reasons for lying is the desire to escape punishment. Ericsson shares her own experience of lying to a bank to avoid financial penalties, illustrating how individuals may resort to lies when faced with the prospect of negative repercussions. Economic problems often serve as a compelling motivation for deceit.

Furthermore, lies are sometimes employed to maintain harmony in relationships, be it with partners, colleagues, or friends. Ericsson describes how sparing her partner additional stress by concealing her own struggles contributed to a peaceful atmosphere at home. In such cases, lying is seen as a means to preserve the equilibrium of interpersonal relationships.

Ericsson acknowledges that while lies may offer short-term relief or protection, they come with consequences. People may lose trust in the liar once the truth is revealed, potentially leading to the dissolution of friendships and strained relationships. The web of lies may become too intricate to sustain, ultimately causing more harm than good.

Consequences of Lies

Ericsson emphasizes the far-reaching consequences of lies, both on an individual and societal level. Lies can lead to delusion and illusion, blurring the lines between reality and falsehood. Delusion, closely related to other forms of lying, involves protecting oneself from uncomfortable truths by concocting excuses and justifications. Ericsson warns against the dangers of deluding oneself, as it can prevent personal growth and self-awareness.

On a larger scale, lies can be used to manipulate and control entire societies. Deceptive narratives, perpetuated by institutions and individuals in positions of power, can shape public opinion and lead people to believe falsehoods. Ericsson's essay serves as a reminder of the importance of critical thinking and discernment in the face of pervasive deception.

Conclusion

In conclusion, Stephanie Ericsson's essay, "The Ways We Lie," offers a comprehensive exploration of the intricate world of deception that surrounds us. From the white lies we tell to spare feelings to the out-and-out lies that leave no room for doubt, lying is an integral part of human existence. Ericsson sheds light on the motivations behind lying, the justifications we employ, and the consequences that inevitably follow.

While lies may sometimes provide temporary relief or protection, they also carry the weight of broken trust and shattered illusions. Ericsson's essay challenges readers to reflect on their own experiences with lying and the ethical dilemmas it presents. In a world where deception is prevalent, it is essential to navigate the fine line between preserving harmony and upholding honesty.

Ultimately, "The Ways We Lie" serves as a poignant reminder that lies are a complex and pervasive aspect of human communication. Understanding the motivations behind lying and the potential consequences can empower individuals to make informed choices about when, if ever, deception is justified.