24/7 writing help on your phone
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Authority, legitimacy and power are amongst the key elements of any political system. For that reason, they have actually been topics of much debate throughout the ages with numerous schools of idea adding to government hence shaping the discipline into the structure we know today.
The very first of the 3 elements, authority, can be specified as the right to release a command (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:39). Nevertheless, the command that is released should be provided with some sense of justice in order to guarantee its authenticity.
The sense of justice nevertheless, can be available to conflicting understandings and we therefore require to deal with justice as a principle. According to Plato, when one asks the question, what is justice? One is synonymously asking, what is the very best kind of a state? (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:2). Plato believed that the finest form of the state is one in which each specific aims to be the best version of themselves and desires the state of goodness.
This goodness would hence fulfil the homes of how we ought to live and act. When this moral regrowth has actually occurred, an individual in a position of authority, releasing a command, does so rightfully. (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:39)In contrast to Platos ideology that guys can inherently aim to goodness, Thomas Hobbes postulated that all males would not pursue the state (albeit optimistic) of goodness without being commanded to do so.
The guardian of this command ought to be an individual chosen from the masses by the masses elevated to a position of complete authority (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:10).
The justice in the commands issued by Hobbes patriarch lay in the prescription by the patriarch of the meaning of right and incorrect, great and bad, mine and yours. (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:10)This state of affairs then leads one to believe that the commands issued by the patriarch rightfully released rendering the citizens bound to obey. (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:39). This then leads one to the issue of the legitimacy of the issued command. When is a command released and power wielded authenticity? Which conditions by their authenticity sure obedience? (Simmons, 1979). One proposed response is embodied in the postulation of John Locke.
Locke maintained that the consent of the citizens is the most important factor in legitimizing governments authority (Simmonds, 1974). Since consent has been given by the citizens and the ruler is actively ruling the state, it is safe to assume that a social contract exists. Breach of the contract would constitute a crisis of legitimacy. This crisis is summarised by Locke as follows; if the government takes powers that are not granted to them, they dissolve the contract between themselves and the people, and thus the people are released from their obligations to obey. (Lock, 1967).
Any individual in a state of authority issuing commands deemed to be legitimate holds some sense of power. This power can be defined as the ability to influence or control the actions of others, to get them to do what we want them to, and what they otherwise would not have done. (Beetham, 1991:43). This power can only be attained through the possession of superior capacities or resources. (Beetham, 1991:44). One can then assume that a position of authority places a ruler in a superior position rendering the ruler powerful. Maintaining this power however, according to Machiavelli would only be possible if the patriarch was to cheat the onset of political decay. (Stirk and Weigall 1995:226).
He further postulated that using brute force and might would be the effective method to protect the sovereign position and that the Prince will take action in peaceful times in order to resist adversity when fortune changes. This force is the central tenant in the maintenance of power. (Bonadeo, 1973)The intertwining of these principles should ensure the wholesomeness of any political fraternity. Justice however is the pivotal factor in maintaining the balance. Shorn of this association with right, we lose the ability to distinguish between legitimate and illegitimate power, between authority and sheer might. (Stirk and Weigall, 1995:39).
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.get help with your assignment