For many people, the zoo is a place for them to have fond memories. The first evidence of wild animals being put on public exhibition dates to 2,500 B.C.E. in Ancient Egypt (Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd Edition). Perhaps when I was a child, there were countless times to go to the zoo or the circus with my family to watch animal shows and enjoy the good times. But when we grew up, we looked at the world from an adult perspective, but we also found something that we had never thought of at a young age.
When we happily bought tickets for admission to the wonderful animal talent show, have you ever thought of the cruel truth hidden behind you? When you visit a zoo, do you ever wonder how humans began to keep other animals in captivity? Have you noticed that some animals are kept in small cages, while others have more space to roam? You know that lions, tigers, elephants, monkeys, black bears, etc.
, because of fear, are forced to learn to violate nature. For me, I think humanity can’t support animal shows at zoos or circuses. Because of the following two main reasons, I think animal performances in the zoo or circus are wrong and need to be sanctioned.
First of all, my main reason is the issue of animal abuse. In general, wild animals should have free space to live and live a natural life in their habitat. How would you feel if separated from your family, you were shipped to different cities in a cage no less, Bound of life, with pain/pleasure techniques, And complete humility for performance under duress, A whip no less.
If you were a tiger would you do it? Would you break away, think of escape and if desperate, kill and avow your infinite humiliation and guaranteed Death? – Serj Tankian, “Circus Tiger” However, because the circus uses violence to subdue the inside of animals, these wild animals are deprived of the most basic life rights such as freedom to live, feed, socialize, play, etc. according to nature. They were handcuffed and became the money tree of the Tuli merchants. From any point of view, they could not find any excuse to support the animal performance. Not only do circus animals suffer from mental and physical abuse, but ruthless trainers and masters often close them in prison spaces like prisoners. Large animals, such as elephants, lions and tigers, need a lot of space to freely move and communicate with their peers. Elephants in the wild may walk 40 kilometers a day, rolling in the mud and living in groups. However, when the circus travels long distances, the elephants are mostly squatted or locked in cages.
The second part to be mentioned is the relevant legal part. Because the laws of the world are not perfect for the circus or the zoo’s legal provisions, and there is no government agency to supervise the training process, the circus thus removes the responsibility of animal cruelty. However, some hidden cameras captured the elephant’s image of being attacked by hooks and electric bats during training. The big cat with heavy shackles on the neck was beaten by the stick, the bear was slammed and the stick was stabbed, and the black scorpion was smashed and smashed. The heavy surveillance screen of whipping still scares me. In particular, we can find tigers, monkeys and bears in the Chinese circus, which became the object of persecution because of the lack of legal guarantees related to animal welfare. In China’s numerous private circuses, visitors can see monkeys squatting on stilts, big bears walking on balance beams, lions, dogs, tigers and other animals performing a variety of non-natural tricks. The way to abuse and carelessly treat animals in the audience is not visible to the audience. According to the details in the PETA report, the tiger cub that was born one day was forced to take away from the mother. The monkeys appeared to be self-mutilating like biting their own arms. The bears were tied to the wall by chains and could not sit for hours. In this way, they are trained to use only the hind limbs to walk. The PETA report also stated that none of these animals received adequate food, water and medical care.
However, many people may also object to and offer the benefits of watching animal performances at the zoo or the circus. As Benjamin Wallace-Wells wrote two years ago in a piece for New York magazine titled, ‘The Case for the End of the Modern Zoo’: I realize that to even raise this issue makes you sound like some kind of sour, rule-bound Vegetarian, so let me make clear my position up front: I love zoos. My daughter is not quite 2, and the zoo brings out all of her best and least complicated emotions — awe, delight, empathy. (Benjamin, 2014). For me, it is more because the adults have indirectly caused these tragedies in order to satisfy the zoo dreams of our children. It is precisely because we humans have these pursuits of entertainment, so the zoo and the circus have a similar market supply mechanism to achieve our wish.
In addition, some circuses have also raised questions like no animals they can’t attract customers. However, there is actually such a circus in Canada. They don’t have animal performances, and they use high-tech factors instead. They use a series of wonderful and profound stories to cleverly connect high-definition performances with a tight rhythm, and the deadline has attracted more than 7.2 million viewers. It can be seen that even if there is no animal doping in the performance, it can be welcomed by the audience.
It is also worth mentioning that the authors believe that many species are entirely likely to leave them in zoos or safari parks and to make their quality of life higher or higher than in the wild. Even if their actions may be limited, they will not be threatened or stressed or parasite by predators. However, as I mentioned earlier, these animals have lost their basic freedom, although they do not have to travel in the wild. There are a lot of circus animals who are even imprisoned in a messy place, not as the author of this article argues. For example, in August 2015, a documentary filmed by PETA investigators showed that the animals of the Suzhou Circus in China were beaten by trainers and survived in extremely dirty and crowded places.
For the circus’s commercial purposes, the well-being of animals is clearly ignored. So a good zoo will provide great care and protection to animals in their care. These are good things for the individuals concerned, but what do zoos actually bring to the table for the visitors and the wider world? Holding any animal in captivity has questionable ethics. The educational function of the circus is obviously a myth of mistakes, because the circus does not present the natural side of the animal. Many animals are also unable to live normally due to long-term sleep in the harsh environment of a painful zoo, with health problems, depression and aggression. Furthermore, Amusement was certainly administrators reject the idea that the primary purpose of zoos is to provide entertainment. Indeed, many agree that the pleasure we take in viewing wild animals is not in itself a good enough reason to keep them in captivity. So for me, I think I will still stick to the performance of animal performances or so-called talent shows. After all, animals are also living with dignity, and I believe that everything is equal when born.