Essay, Pages 3 (696 words)
Why is it that true love always ends in death? Why do the good always die young? The answers to these questions can be found in this mournful tragedy. Each person in the story of Romeo and Juliet at one time or more is an adversary(1) and have opportunities to stop things from spiraling out of control. Unfortunately they choose not to. In “Romeo and Juliet” by William Shakespeare, the Friars, the Prince, and the parents of both families are definitely at fault for the tragic deaths.
Friar Laurence and Friar John have major roles in the extremely lamentable(2) deaths.
To begin with, if Friar Laurence announces the marriage in the first place Romeo and Juliet would not have to go on a perilous(3) journey to hide their aspired(4) love instead of augmenting(5) the problem by ignoring it. Or at least he could tell the Prince when he decides to banish Romeo. It is Friar John’s duty to deliver the message to Romeo in Mantua.
In the following passage Friar John says,” Here in this city visiting the sick/ and finding him, the searchers of the town/ suspecting that we were both in a house/ where the infectious pestilence did reign/ sealed up the doors and would not let us forth”(V. II. 7-11). However, Friar John is not able to enter Mantua. Balthazar is able to get word to Romeo despite the sickness in the town. Friar John should be able to conjure(6) up a way to get word to Romeo.
Also Friar Laurence should be waiting at the tomb for Juliet to awake rather than wait longer. This way he would be ready for anything to go wrong. Another culprit for the deaths in this story is the Prince. His first mistake is the transgression(7) between Romeo and Tybalt. The Prince says, ”
And for that offence Immediately we do exile him hence. I have an interest in your hate’s proceeding my blood for your rude brawls doth lie a-bleeding but I’ll amerce with so strong a fine that you will all repent the loss of mine” (III. II. 179-184). On the contrary of saying this he should realize that one death on each side should be enough suffrage for one day and should not loath(8) Romeo for his actions. Also, the Prince should realize how his action affects Romeo’s kin(9).
On the first occasion that he notices and dispute between the families, he should be able to notice that from this point forward it can only get worse. He should stop it at this point in time before it escalates. Also, he sits by and waits for there to be a problem and then address it. The Prince should be the one to go looking for the problem and cut it off at the head right away. Lastly, the parents of both families could do more to keep their children alive. After all, they are the reason why Romeo and Juliet have to hide their love.
Because of their rancor(10) for one another their kids will never be able to tell them about their marriage. Because Lord Capulet tries to make Juliet marry Paris, she is forced to find some way to stay loyal to Romeo while obeying her father. In the passage Lord Capulet states,” I tell thee what-get thee to church a Thursday/ or never after look me in the face” (III. V. 161-162). By saying this he explains that if she refuses to marry Paris, that she will never be able to talk to or see her father again.
Finally, the Montagues should come up with more of a cunning(11) plan than just crying for their son. All, they do is cry and mourn over him being banished. They should plead their case to the Prince. The Friars, the Prince, and both parents from both families are undoubtedly to blame for the tragic deaths in the story of Romeo and Juliet. The factors that could change the tragic events would be knowledge of the marriage, knowledge of the deaths, Romeo’s banishment, and bad timing. If just a few of these events had gone differently would Romeo and Juliet still be alive?