The Darker Side of Human Nature: Indifference and Evil

In the literary realm, Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" and Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" delve into the common theme that individuals often remain indifferent to cruelty until they find themselves as the recipients of it. These narratives reveal that when the darker aspects of human nature become self-centered, evil can prevail, highlighting the innate capacity for malevolence within individuals, where convictions and morals may be compromised by circumstance. Both authors demonstrate that societal standards and learned behavior can lead to the acceptance of injustices and cruelties as normal behavior.

Rainsford's Evolution in "The Most Dangerous Game"

In "The Most Dangerous Game," Richard Connell introduces the protagonist, Rainsford, as a celebrated hunter with a seemingly indifferent attitude toward the prey he pursues. The opening conversation between Rainsford and his companion, Whitney, on the yacht provides insights into Rainsford's nonchalant approach to hunting. However, fate intervenes, leading Rainsford to an island where he encounters another skilled hunter, General Zaroff. As the narrative unfolds, Rainsford gradually witnesses the veneer of civility fading away, revealing the true nature of General Zaroff.

Get quality help now

WriterBelle

Verified writer

Proficient in: Free Essays

4.7 (657)

“ Really polite, and a great writer! Task done as described and better, responded to all my questions promptly too! ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

The General expounds on the notion that hunting humans is the logical evolution of their art, asserting a shared kinship between him and Rainsford. Initially appalled by the comparison, Rainsford clings to the moral high ground until circumstances force him to become the hunted. Rainsford, now the prey, relies on his extensive knowledge, hunting experience, and primal survival instincts. Connell masterfully guides the reader through twists and turns, providing moments of hope for Rainsford, only to snatch them away.

Due to Rainsford's cunning and resourcefulness, the General experiences the most exhilarating hunt of his life. Ultimately, Rainsford outsmarts the General, turning the tables and emerging victorious. The story concludes with Rainsford sleeping in the General's bed, leaving readers to ponder whether he has inherited the mantle of the very man he defeated.

Mrs. Hutchinson's Tragic Lottery in Shirley Jackson's Narrative

Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" unfolds in a small farming community, initially presenting a seemingly ordinary event with diminishing significance over time. The protagonist, Mrs. Hutchinson, enters the narrative abruptly, rushing to the crowd and revealing her forgetfulness regarding the event's significance. As the names are drawn, the heads of households accept their fate with robotic detachment, a reflection of the desensitization resulting from tradition.

Bill Hutchinson, Mrs. Hutchinson's husband, draws the fateful black dot, dramatically altering the family's demeanor. Mrs. Hutchinson protests the unfairness of the drawing, and as the family draws again, she tragically selects the paper with the black dot. The townspeople, devoid of empathy, gather stones to stone her to death as she pleads for fairness. Jackson skillfully exposes the chilling transformation from indifference to brutality within the community.

Parallel Conclusions: The Triumph of Evil

Despite the differing narratives, both Connell and Jackson lead their characters, Rainsford and Mrs. Hutchinson, along a parallel trajectory. At the outset, both characters exhibit indifference to the activities they engage in—the game of hunting for Rainsford and the lottery for Mrs. Hutchinson. Only when dire circumstances arise do they begin to question and reevaluate their previously unexamined beliefs.

Both authors affirm that the natural inclination of humanity tends towards evil rather than morality. Connell accomplishes this by concluding the story with Rainsford in the General's bed, prompting readers to contemplate whether he has assumed the role of his adversary. Similarly, Jackson reinforces this theme by illustrating how even the Hutchinsons' small child is handed stones to participate in the stoning of his own mother.

Human Inherent Evil: A Reflection on Societal Standards

A comparative analysis of both stories underscores the authors' shared assertion that humanity is inherently predisposed to evil. Choices made based on societal standards, traditions, and learned behavior may not align with moral correctness. This echoes the biblical passage from Jeremiah 17:9, "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" (KJV). Both narratives serve as cautionary tales, urging readers to reflect on the capacity for darkness within human nature.

Conclusion: A Confrontation with the Darker Self

In conclusion, Richard Connell's "The Most Dangerous Game" and Shirley Jackson's "The Lottery" skillfully explore the theme of human indifference to cruelty until faced with its consequences. Through the characters of Rainsford and Mrs. Hutchinson, the authors navigate the intricate terrain of human nature, revealing the ease with which individuals may compromise their convictions when confronted with the darker side of existence. The narratives converge to affirm the notion that the path of evil often appears more natural than that of morality. As readers, we are left to ponder the implications of these tales and the stark realities they illuminate about the complexities of the human psyche.