Jack London's Wildlife Realism: Nature Faker Claims

Essay, Pages 3 (670 words)

Views

107

As literary enthusiasts delve into the realm of animal-centric novels, the concept of nature faking has sparked debates, particularly concerning Jack London's work, "The Call of the Wild." Accusations have surfaced, branding London as a nature faker—a writer attributing human characteristics to wild animals. This essay aims to challenge such assertions, asserting that London's depiction of animals remains grounded in realism, avoiding excessive personification often found in fairy-tale narratives, and showcasing a profound understanding of the wild. Through a comprehensive exploration, we aim to unravel the intricacies of London's writing, shedding light on his credibility as a genuine and knowledgeable writer.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get your custom essay on

“ Jack London’s Wildlife Realism: Nature Faker Claims ”

Get custom paper

NEW! smart matching with writer

Animal-Like Characteristics: A Realistic Portrayal

One of the primary reasons why Jack London does not fit the nature faker label is his nuanced portrayal of animals in "The Call of the Wild." Contrary to the accusations, London endows his characters, particularly Buck and Spitz, with distinctly animalistic traits rather than human attributes. The relentless sparring between Buck and Spitz, where they continuously bite each other's necks, exemplifies the barbaric nature inherent in the wild.

In a pivotal moment in the novel, London writes, "Buck did not cry out. He did not check himself but drove in upon Spitz, shoulder to shoulder so hard that he missed the throat..." (London 38). This vivid depiction accentuates the savagery of the animals, a stark departure from human behavior. No rational human being would engage in such a ferocious and primal attack on a fellow human. London, in essence, captures the untamed essence of the wild, rendering the accusation of nature faking baseless.

Limited Personification: Buck's Realistic Struggles

A critical aspect contributing to Jack London's credibility as a genuine wildlife writer is his avoidance of exaggerated personification, a common pitfall in the works of fairy-tale authors. Unlike those who ascribe fantastical abilities to animals, London keeps the actions of his characters, especially Buck, firmly rooted in reality. An illuminating example surfaces when Buck, after a strenuous day of pulling, exhibits signs of exhaustion. Despite the fatigue, Buck persists and thrives, showcasing a resilience typical of wild animals.

London, through his prose, avoids molding the narrative around unrealistic actions that animals cannot perform. A pertinent quote from the novel illustrates this point: "...the wound-stiffened team was under way, struggling painfully over the hardest part of the trail they had yet encountered, and for that matter, the hardest between them and Dawson..." (London 17). This portrayal reinforces the struggles of these animals as they pull a sled, aligning with the natural behaviors of animals in the wild rather than amplifying them into fantastical scenarios.

Vivid Description of the Wild: London's In-Depth Knowledge

Jack London's intimate understanding of the wild stands as a formidable defense against the nature faker accusation. His clear and vivid descriptions of the wild in "The Call of the Wild" underscore a wealth of knowledge, which extends beyond mere storytelling. London's firsthand experiences, including his visit to the Yukon, equip him with insights into the struggles, survival techniques, and intricacies of wildlife.

The novel presents an example of London's comprehensive knowledge: "Close in under the sheltering rock, Buck made his nest. So snug and warm it was..." (London 26). This succinctly portrays London's awareness of the wildlife's habits, from how they sleep to how they adapt to their surroundings. Such attention to detail exemplifies London's commitment to presenting an authentic portrayal of the wild, dismantling any claims of nature fakery.

Conclusion: In Defense of Jack London's Authenticity

In conclusion, the allegations labeling Jack London as a nature faker crumble upon closer examination of his work, "The Call of the Wild." London's deliberate portrayal of animals with animal-like characteristics, avoidance of exaggerated personification, and profound knowledge of the wild collectively refute the nature faker label. Through the lens of realism, London crafts a narrative that immerses readers in the untamed beauty of the wild while dispelling myths associated with exaggerated animal behaviors. Far from distorting nature, London emerges as a strong, believable writer who enriches the literary landscape with authentic depictions of the natural world.