To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
In recent decades, the global community has come to a collective realization of its responsibility to bequeath a clean and peaceful planet to future generations. The transition from theoretical commitments to the active implementation of corrective measures against polluting and destructive practices is a relatively recent development. As we stand on the threshold of a new century and millennium, time is of the essence. The imperative to enhance and expedite measures for sustainable development, particularly in preventing the release of toxic substances and hazardous waste generation, has never been more critical.
When considering who should shoulder the responsibility for the environment, four main groups emerge.
The initial inclination might be to place this responsibility on the governments of the world. Trust is vested in governments with the expectation that they comprehend the true value of the environment and effectively address any threats to it. Labor policies assert a commitment to environmental protection, aligning with the constitution's dedication to enhancing the environment.
However, Greenpeace offers a dissenting view, contending that governments, driven by profitability, often neglect environmental considerations in decision-making.
The role of governments in achieving sustainable development is undeniably significant. The consent, support, and funding provided by governments are indispensable for any meaningful environmental action. As voters and taxpayers, expectations are set for governments to enact policies preserving green belts, safeguarding national parks, beaches, and mountains. Governments are also entrusted with enforcing laws and regulations against individuals or businesses violating environmental protection laws.
Recent global summits have underscored the influence governments wield in the environmental arena.
An example is the summit centered on convincing the USA, a major producer of greenhouse gases, to make substantial efforts to reduce emissions. The summit's failure is attributed to perceived shortcomings in the British government's efforts to garner support for new measures. This highlights the pivotal role of governments in shaping global environmental initiatives and the tangible impact their decisions can have on the planet.
The significance of government decisions is underscored by the fact that small changes to environmental policies can have substantial repercussions on a national or even global scale. This mirrors the impact of individual responsibility, where small changes made by each person, such as recycling, can collectively lead to significant positive changes. The contrast between the influence of government decisions and individual actions emphasizes the interconnectedness of efforts on both fronts to address environmental challenges.
A proposal is made for increased efforts by the media to raise awareness about the environment. While the government's role is acknowledged in training people to inform the public and conducting environmental promotions, concerns about media overkill leading to public desensitization are also raised. The challenge lies in maintaining a delicate balance, ensuring consistent reminders without causing the public to become indifferent to environmental issues. The media is viewed as a potential ally in motivating individuals to take action by keeping them informed about the state of the environment.
While it's important to recognize that individuals share responsibility for the environment, individuals may have varying degrees of care for the environment. While achieving universal accountability may be nearly impossible, the increased media efforts to inform the public about environmental issues could lead to greater individual responsibility. The government, in this context, is seen as having a role in facilitating and encouraging such awareness campaigns.
In conclusion, the collective responsibility to deliver a clean and peaceful planet to future generations necessitates concerted efforts from governments, individuals, and the media. The influential role of governments in shaping environmental policies and initiatives cannot be overstated, with their decisions having a tangible impact on a global scale. Simultaneously, we need to highlight the interconnectedness of individual responsibility, where small actions collectively contribute to positive environmental outcomes. The proposal for increased media efforts to maintain public awareness emphasizes the need for a collaborative approach to address the challenges facing our environment.
Environmental Responsibility: Governments and Media for Sustainability. (2020, Jun 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/environment-whose-responsibility-4000-new-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment