To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Within the framework of Daniel J. Boorstin's theory, the history of America's democracy unfolds as a narrative where disagreement plays a pivotal role in fostering discussions and finding solutions. Boorstin argues that disagreement serves as the lifeblood of democracy, providing citizens with the choice to voice their opinions and effect change. This essay delves into historical events, such as the Brown v.
Board of Education in the 1950s and the response to the genocide in Sudan, to illustrate the impact of disagreement on the success and unity of American democracy.
Board of Education
The 1950s marked a crucial period in American history, with racial segregation being a deeply entrenched issue. The landmark case of Brown v. Board of Education emerged as a product of persistent disagreement among Americans regarding the constitutionality of school segregation. This protracted debate ultimately led to a groundbreaking decision that ended the era of segregated schools. If, during this time, African Americans had chosen dissension, deciding to perpetually "feel apart from others," the trajectory of American history might have been drastically different, perhaps without the election of a black president in contemporary times.
Disagreement, as Boorstin contends, is the essence of democracy.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Theory
5 (234)
“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”
African Americans, fueled by their disagreement with racial segregation and discrimination, actively engaged in debates and arguments to challenge the status quo. By choosing disagreement over dissension, they sought equality and justice. The successful outcome of Brown v. Board of Education stands as a testament to how disagreement can lead to tangible improvements in a democratic society.
In contrast to the Brown v. Board of Education decision, the American government's response to the genocide in Sudan exemplifies the detrimental effects of dissension on democracy. Termed "The Silent Genocide," the tragedy garnered minimal awareness and action. Boorstin's assertion that dissension is a democracy's cancer becomes evident as the American populace, though recognizing the appalling nature of the issue, largely chose to dissent and remain detached.
The genocide in Sudan, with its staggering casualties, faced a lack of proactive disagreement and discussion. The regular disagreement that Boorstin identifies as vital for a liberal society to thrive was overshadowed by dissension and ignorance. The consequence was a lingering problem that worsened over time. Boorstin's distinction between dissension and disagreement becomes palpable, with dissension acting as an impediment to addressing societal conflicts.
Boorstin's insights into the dynamics of democracy emphasize the importance of disagreement in fostering progress and unity. Disagreement, as seen in the Brown v. Board of Education case, serves as a catalyst for positive change. It empowers individuals to challenge existing norms and work towards a more equitable society. In contrast, dissension, as witnessed in the response to the Sudanese genocide, acts as a hindrance, allowing issues to persist without resolution.
As Boorstin eloquently puts it, a democracy is "killed by dissension." The examples provided underscore the critical role that disagreement plays in the vitality of democracy. It is through open dialogue, debates, and a willingness to engage with differing opinions that a democratic society thrives. Disagreement, far from being a divisive force, emerges as the cornerstone of progress, encouraging citizens to actively participate in shaping the course of their nation.
In conclusion, the historical analysis of events such as Brown v. Board of Education and the response to the Sudanese genocide highlights the nuanced relationship between disagreement, dissension, and the success of American democracy. Boorstin's theory serves as a lens through which we can understand the dynamics of societal conflicts and the role disagreement plays in steering a democracy towards progress and unity. As citizens, fostering a culture of open disagreement becomes paramount for the continued flourishing of democratic ideals.
The Role of Disagreement in Democracy: A Historical Analysis. (2016, Dec 06). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/dissent-vs-disagreement-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
