Rethinking the Constitution: A Comprehensive Analysis

Charles Beard's critique, as presented in "Framing the Constitution," posits that the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia was driven solely by the economic interests of its members, neglecting the fundamental rights of citizens. This essay aims to challenge Beard's assertions by examining the events leading to the Philadelphia Convention, scrutinizing the Articles of Confederation, and delving into the Constitution's structure and amendments.

The Flaws of the Articles of Confederation

The genesis of the Constitution lies in the inadequacies of the Articles of Confederation established in 1781.

The initial attempt to form a national and state government proved unsuccessful due to inherent flaws. Notably, each state possessed equal voting power in Congress, regardless of size. Congress lacked the authority to tax or regulate commerce, and a national court system and executive branch were absent. Moreover, constitutional amendments required a unanimous vote, while the passage of laws demanded a 9/13 vote, leading to legislative inefficiency.

This decentralization allowed states to govern independently, printing their own currency and hindering interstate trade, resulting in economic instability.

Get quality help now

Bella Hamilton

Verified writer

Proficient in: Constitution

5 (234)

“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

The absence of a national enforcing authority plunged the United States into chaos, prompting events such as Shays' Rebellion, a notable revolt stemming from Massachusetts' taxation policies and economic hardships.

The Constitutional Convention and Its Imperatives

Recognizing the need for change, delegates assembled in Philadelphia in 1787 to address the issues plaguing the young nation. The Constitutional Convention identified flaws in the Articles of Confederation and determined the necessity of a new governing document. The resulting Constitution consisted of seven articles, the first three delineating the separation of powers within a three-branch federal government, incorporating checks and balances to ensure equitable power distribution.

The fourth article defined the relationship between states and the federal government, while the fifth addressed the amendment process. The sixth emphasized the supremacy of federal law over state laws, and the seventh formally declared the Constitution as the supreme law of the United States. This framework aimed to provide a comprehensive system of governance, acknowledging the needs of states, individuals, and the nation as a whole.

Addressing Beard's Claims: Minority Representation and Economic Interests

Beard's assertion that minorities were inadequately represented in the Constitution is countered by the fifteenth amendment, which safeguards against majority oppression. The establishment of the Electoral College further ensures minority voices are heard in the democratic process. Dismissing Beard's claim that the framers were solely motivated by economic interests, it is essential to recognize that these individuals, while successful in their own right, demonstrated foresight and knowledge in crafting a document that safeguarded the welfare and rights of every individual.

The inevitable existence of an unequal distribution of property and wealth in society is acknowledged. However, the United States Constitution provides a platform for anyone to pursue success, wealth, and representation of their beliefs within legal boundaries. The enduring strength of the Constitution lies in its ability to protect individual rights, fostering an environment where each person can pursue their aspirations.

The Constitution's Enduring Legacy

Today, government officials are educated, knowledgeable, and often affluent individuals elected to represent both the ideas of their constituents and their personal agendas. Beard's theory, seemingly crafted for personal recognition, can be dismissed by acknowledging the success of a document that has held a nation together for centuries. Despite Beard's article being steeped in propaganda that fueled societal fears, the United States Constitution has stood the test of time, providing a stable foundation for the pursuit of individual endeavors within the confines of the law.

In conclusion, a comprehensive examination of the events leading to the Constitutional Convention, the flaws of the Articles of Confederation, and the structure of the Constitution itself reveals the fallacies in Beard's claims. The framers, far from being solely motivated by self-interest, demonstrated a keen understanding of governance and individual rights. The enduring legacy of the Constitution attests to its success in providing a framework that has guided the United States through centuries of growth and change.