We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
Back
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

Back
3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Back
Get Offer

The Munich Agreement

Paper type: Essay
Pages: 5 (1071 words)
Categories: Event, Historical Place, History, Life, Period, War, World War 2, World War Ii, Ww2
Downloads: 36
Views: 232

In 1939 the world was plunged into World War II due to the fact that of the Munich Agreement. The Munich Agreement was a contract regarding the Sudetenland Crisis between the major powers of Europe after a conference kept in Munich in Germany in 1938. The Sudetenland was an essential area of Czechoslovakia. The Treaty of Versailles was the peace treaty created as a result of 6 months of settlements at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, which put an official end to World War I in between the Allies and Central Powers.

The Munich Contract triggered numerous disagreements in between European nations. Collective security was a more effective response to aggressiveness than appeasement due to the fact that more European nations disagreed than agreed with the choice made during the Munich Conference for numerous factors and Germany had lots of ways of keeping its areas under control.

First, Germany had numerous methods of keeping its people under control.

Propaganda was an important factor of keeping Germans under control. Using photos or mentor trainees at school he did anything and everything to get people to be versus the Jews. In Document 3, it is stated that Hitler assured to end the Treaty of Versailles. Likewise he sent battalions into the Rhineland’s demilitarized zone to “abandon the last shackles attached upon Germany by the Treaty of Versailles” (Doc.3). A few of Hitler’s ideas are described in File 1. Hitler believed Germany would never “have the ethical right to participate in colonial politics till, a minimum of, it includes its own children within a single state” (Doc.1). This suggests that Hitler believed that Germany would never ever have the ability to go into colonial politics until Germany had colonies of its own. He likewise mentions that oppressed areas are not lowered back to the common Reich or empire by protests, but by other territories or countries with higher military power. In the Munich Conference, Germany was enabled territory in Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia, however numerous countries did not agree to this.

Second, Collective Security was a more effective response to aggression because more European countries disagreed with the decision made at the Munich Conference. Some people that didn’t approve were Winston Churchill, George F. Kennan, A.J.P. Taylor, and Keith Eubank. Document 6 was from England’s point of view through Winston Churchill, a British Conservative politician. Churchill disagreed with the decision because “keeping peace depends on holding back the aggressor.” (Doc.6). He thought that Europe needed to restrain Germany and that Britain and France together should have guaranteed security of Czechoslovakia. George F. Kennan, an American Secretary of State during the Cold War, spoke in America’s point of view in Document 7 and also disagreed. Kennan stated that the Munich Agreement was a “desperate act of appeasement at the cost of the Czechoslovak state.” (Doc.7) He disapproved with the agreement because he believed that the British Primer Minister Neville Chamberlain and the French premier, Daladier, agreed with Germany’s proposal because they wanted to avoid European war and wanted to secure a peaceful future for Europe.

A British historian, A.J.P. Taylor, wrote in The Origins of the Second World War that other countries should have become involved by armed force in 1933 “to over throw Hitler when he had come to power by constitutional means and was apparently supported by a large majority of the German people.” (Doc.8) Taylor thought that if more countries became involved with this issue, Czechoslovakia would have been secure. He also believed the German people were the only ones who could “turn [Hitler] out” (Doc.8) because they were the ones that put him in power. He also stated that “the ‘appeasers’ feared that the defeat of Germany would be followed by a Russian domination over much of Europe” (Doc.8) which many people did not want. Third, Keith Eubank argued in Origins of World War II that stopping Hitler prior to 1939 was not an issue for several reasons. One reason being that the people and the government of Britain and France were not “conditioned to the idea of war before September 1, 1939” (Doc.9) and that Hitler had don’t nothing to threaten Europe’s peaceful future. Eubank also stated the French “feared a repetition of the bloody sacrifices of 1914-1918.” and the British wanted to appease Hitler. Not many countries had agreed with the Munich Agreement.

Appeasement was a less effective response to aggression because fewer countries agreed with the Munich Agreement. Some of Adolf Hitler’s ideas were stated in Document 1 such as needing colonies in order to enter colonial politics and that oppressed territories were not demoted to nothing by protests but by countries with stronger military forces. Haile Selassie, the emperor of Ethiopia, asked the League of Nations fro help in stopping the invasion after Italy attacked Ethiopia. When the League of Nations’ response was ineffective, Selassie stated “God and history will remember your judgment. It is us today. It will be you tomorrow.” (Doc.2). This statement is like karma; because the League of Nations didn’t help Ethiopia, it would be attacked and get no help.

This statement is in the point of view of Ethiopian people, but also for other European countries because when countries are without help, the country it asks will later be without help also. They will be in the same situation as the country asking for its help; “It is us today. It will be you tomorrow.” Document 5 is in the point of view of the British. Document 5 states why the British Primer Minister, Neville Chamberlain, favored a policy of appeasement in dealing with Hitler at the Munich Conference in 1938. The main reason Chamberlain agreed to a policy of appeasement because he wanted to avoid war. Primer Minister Neville Chamberlain wanted a peaceful Europe and didn’t want conflict between European countries. He states that he is a “man of peace” (Doc.5) and “war is a fearful thing”

In conclusion, collective security was the most effective response to aggression because more countries disagreed and were against Germany because it was threatening the peace of Europe. England, Britain, and America were against Germany acquiring land from Czechoslovakia while the Primer Minister Neville Chamberlain favored it in order to avoid war. Adolf Hitler used propaganda to maintain his power and influence people to make him and his Reith stronger. The world plunged into World War II in 1939 because of Germany, Hitler, and the Munich Agreement.

Cite this essay

The Munich Agreement. (2016, Feb 28). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-munich-agreement-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now

image

Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!