Decoding Movie Ratings: "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" Unveiled

Introduction

Have you ever found yourself barred from watching a movie due to its rating? Perhaps it was the stern doorman at a movie theater or the watchful gaze of your parents enforcing these cinematic restrictions. Until recently, the intricacies of film ratings and the enigmatic figures behind the process were matters I seldom pondered. That was until I stumbled upon "This Film Is Not Yet Rated," an independent documentary available on Netflix, IBC Films, and BBC Films. This eye-opening production seeks to unravel the mysteries of the Motion Picture Association of America's (MPAA) rating system through personal interviews and daring undercover investigations.

In the following exploration, we delve into the documentary's background, its release, and the critical insights it provides into the often opaque world of film ratings.

Background of the Documentary

Released on September 1, 2006, following its premiere at the Sundance Film Festival, "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" quickly emerged as a thought-provoking commentary on the MPAA's rating system.

Get quality help now

Prof. Finch

Verified writer

Proficient in: Film

4.7 (346)

“ This writer never make an mistake for me always deliver long before due date. Am telling you man this writer is absolutely the best. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

Notably, the original cut of the film received the restrictive NC-17 rating. However, through an appeal process, a revised version surfaced, defiantly stamped as "not rated." This dynamic shift sets the stage for an exploration into the documentary's investigative thrust, aiming to expose the inner workings of the MPAA's rating apparatus.

Setting and Cinematography

The documentary unfolds in real-life settings, predominantly captured in the broad daylight. Personal interviews with key figures such as Kirby Dick, Jack Valenti, and Becky Altringer are conducted in office spaces or outdoor locales, lending an authentic feel to the narrative.

Undercover investigations, spearheaded by Altringer, Dick, and Lindsey Howell, unfold in the vicinity of the MPAA's Los Angeles office and nearby locations and restaurants. Employing covert techniques, including hidden cameras, the filmmakers navigate the delicate balance of avoiding detection while emphasizing the practicality and confidentiality of their investigative pursuits. Intermittent transitions transport viewers to scenes from controversial movies like "Team America," "The Cooler," and "The Dreamers," providing a tangible context to the MPAA's scrutiny.

Private Investigation

At the documentary's core is a compelling private investigation led by Kirby Dick and his team, particularly detective Becky Altringer. Focused on unveiling the identities of the MPAA's rating and appeal board members, this clandestine pursuit challenges Jack Valenti's assertion that these members represent the average parent. The opacity surrounding the identity of these decision-makers is laid bare as the investigation unfolds, dedicating considerable effort to unearth their names, backgrounds, and past experiences. The narrative gains momentum as it peels back the layers of secrecy surrounding the individuals shaping the cinematic landscape through their often-controversial decisions.

Controversial Issues and Interviews

The documentary confronts the multifaceted controversies inherent in the film rating process. It dissects the nuances of how films receive their ratings, particularly in relation to issues such as violence, sexual content, and representations of various gender dynamics. Through insightful interviews, the filmmakers navigate the complex terrain of the MPAA's decision-making, shedding light on the subjective nature of the rating process. The tensions between violence and sexual content, the portrayal of homosexual versus heterosexual scenes, and the treatment of male versus female situations emerge as critical focal points. Both film critics and creators contribute to a rich tapestry of perspectives, revealing the intricate interplay between artistic expression and the constraints imposed by the MPAA.

Director and Cinematographers

The collaborative efforts of director Kirby Dick and cinematographers Shana Hagan, Kirsten Johnson, and Amy Vincent shape the documentary's visual narrative. Employing a diverse range of film techniques, including voice-overs, interviews, and carefully selected stock footage, the team weaves a compelling tapestry that captures the historical evolution and origin of the MPAA and governmental censorship. Voice-overs emerge as a powerful tool, amplifying negative sentiments towards the MPAA and underscoring the broader cultural impact of the rating system. Interviews form a cornerstone, providing crucial insights into the filmmakers' perspectives on the evolving nature of film ratings, the lack of clear standards, and the tangible market effects of particular ratings.

Conclusion

In conclusion, my journey through "This Film Is Not Yet Rated" proved to be an enlightening exploration into the opaque realm of film ratings and the MPAA's influence. While the MPAA continues to operate behind curtains, shrouding its staff in secrecy, the documentary's revelations mark a crucial step toward transparency in the film industry. Kirby Dick's audacious efforts, alongside the investigative prowess of Altringer and Howell, successfully pull back the curtain on the MPAA board members. The documentary skillfully captures attention, utilizing humor and mockery to critique the entertainment industry and expose the MPAA's seemingly preposterous and mysterious operations. As we navigate the maze of film ratings, one cannot help but contemplate the necessity for the MPAA to step into the public sphere, fostering dialogue and dispelling misinformation to ensure a more informed cinematic landscape.