Emotive Ethics: Examining the Role of Emotion in Morality

Categories: Ethics

Introduction

The question of whether morals are rooted in emotion is a subject of philosophical inquiry that falls under the umbrella of emotive ethics. Emotivists contend that moral decisions should derive from emotion, with proponents like G.E. Moore advocating the view that moral statements essentially express personal feelings toward actions. This essay explores the emotive perspective, discussing its implications, potential flaws, and criticisms within the broader context of non-cognitive theories, such as relativism and subjectivism.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

The Emotive Perspective: G.E. Moore's View

G.E. Moore, a prominent philosopher, strongly supported the emotive theory, positing that the terms 'right' or 'wrong' in moral statements convey individuals' emotional responses to actions. According to Moore, the diversity of feelings among different individuals renders moral decisions inherently subjective, making it impossible to definitively classify an action as either 'right' or 'wrong.' The emotive theory contends that emotions are the essence of morality, influencing our judgments and decisions.

However, a critical examination reveals a potential flaw in the emotive argument.

Get quality help now
Dr. Karlyna PhD
Dr. Karlyna PhD
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Ethics

star star star star 4.7 (235)

“ Amazing writer! I am really satisfied with her work. An excellent price as well. ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

If moral statements were solely grounded in emotion, decisions could fluctuate daily, akin to choosing a meal for lunch. For instance, a woman contemplating abortion might base her decision on her emotions at that moment. Yet, given the ever-changing nature of emotions, influenced by hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy, such a decision lacks stability. This inherent instability poses challenges in making consistent moral judgments, particularly in complex ethical dilemmas like abortion, euthanasia, and animal rights.

Non-Cognitive Views: Relativism and Subjectivism

The emotive view is classified as a non-cognitive theory, aligning it with other perspectives like relativism and subjectivism. Relativism posits that moral decisions are contingent on cultural, societal, or upbringing factors. Subjectivism, on the other hand, argues that moral decisions derive from personal feelings and tastes, exhibiting significant variability.

Critics of non-cognitive views highlight a fundamental concern: the ability to make moral decisions devoid of emotion. For instance, a judge sentencing someone to the death penalty in certain American states might appear to make a moral decision solely based on legal considerations and professional duty, without overt emotional influence. This challenges the exclusivity of emotion as the primary determinant of morality and underscores the complexity of ethical decision-making.

Implications and Criticisms

If all moral decisions were solely based on emotion or non-cognitive views, the implications for ethics would be profound. The fluidity of emotions suggests that individuals' views and moral decisions could fluctuate daily, leading to a lack of consistency in ethical judgments. This, in turn, raises questions about the stability and reliability of moral frameworks in guiding behavior.

Moreover, the contention that emotions drive morality encounters resistance from the observation that many people adhere to a set of basic morals that remain relatively constant. Despite the ever-changing nature of emotions, individuals often maintain a core set of moral principles. This dissonance challenges the emotive perspective and prompts a reassessment of the factors influencing moral decision-making.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the debate surrounding the emotive nature of morality invites a nuanced exploration of its implications and limitations. While G.E. Moore and emotivists argue for the primacy of emotions in moral decisions, critiques from non-cognitive views and considerations of stability and consistency challenge this perspective. The intricate interplay between emotion and reason in ethical decision-making underscores the complexity of human morality, calling for a comprehensive understanding that transcends simplistic categorizations.

Updated: Dec 01, 2023
Cite this page

Emotive Ethics: Examining the Role of Emotion in Morality. (2016, Jul 05). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-ethical-theory-of-emotivism-essay

Emotive Ethics: Examining the Role of Emotion in Morality essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment