William Blake's "The Chimney Sweeper" 1789 and 1794

Introduction

William Blake, an eminent poet of the Romantic era, presents a poignant exploration of innocence and experience in his poems. One of his notable works, "The Chimney Sweeper," exists in two versions, 1789 and 1794, each offering a distinctive perspective on the harsh realities faced by chimney sweepers in Blake's contemporary society. This essay delves into a comprehensive comparative analysis, examining the nuanced differences in diction, tone, and point of view between the two renditions.

Diction and Point of View: A Child's World

The 1789 and 1794 versions of "The Chimney Sweeper" share a common thread in their use of simple, childlike diction.

This choice is not coincidental; it stems from the narrators' perspectives. In the 1789 version, the speaker is a young child, and this innocence permeates the poem, creating a tone of blissful unawareness. The child perceives his challenging life as a blessing, oblivious to the grim reality imposed by his father. The 1794 version maintains the childlike diction but shifts the point of view to an adult who comprehends the harsh truth behind the parents' actions.

Get quality help now

Marrie pro writer

Verified writer

Proficient in: Free Essays

5 (204)

“ She followed all my directions. It was really easy to contact her and respond very fast as well. ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

This results in a critical and cynical tone that sharply contrasts with the innocence of the child narrator in 1789.

Throughout both renditions, references to God are expressed in terms of praise, echoing the way in which children are taught to perceive the divine. Regardless of the narrator's age, the speakers exude an air of happiness and tranquility, shielded from the awareness of their status as virtual slaves destined for premature demise. This childlike diction, rooted in the innocence of the narrators, emphasizes their lack of understanding about the harshness of their existence.

Point of View and Its Influence on Tone

Blake's 1789 version, narrated by a young boy, encapsulates a child's incapacity to comprehend the severity of his situation. The child's innocent perspective infuses the poem with a childlike and optimistic tone. Convinced that he "need not fear harm," the boy maintains a positive outlook, a stark contrast to the grim conditions surrounding him. The innocence of the narrator injects a glimmer of hope into an otherwise solemn situation.

Contrastingly, the 1794 poem adopts a more negative tone, serving as a reproach to the society that sells young boys into slavery while their parents devoutly engage in religious practices. Narrated by an adult who grasps the sorrowful circumstances, the poem condemns parents who neglect their responsibilities in pursuit of religious piety. The awareness of the adult speaker highlights the societal issues plaguing the chimney sweepers, adding depth to the poem's critique.

The Unfortunate Lives of Chimney Sweepers

The unfortunate, sorrowful lives of the boys in both poems are unveiled through the parallel burdening backgrounds. Despite the different awareness levels of the child and adult narrators, each boy experiences hardships that individuals their age should not endure. Both find joy and happiness in the terrible conditions they face, for they cannot perceive the actions of their parents as the adult speaker in the 1794 poem can. Blake ingeniously employs childlike diction to draw connections between the two poems, while the differing tones effectively isolate them, revealing distinct perspectives on the chimney sweepers' plight.

Conclusion

In conclusion, William Blake's "The Chimney Sweeper" in its 1789 and 1794 versions offers a profound exploration of innocence and experience. The childlike diction unites the poems, underscoring the narrators' lack of awareness, while the varying tones isolate them, presenting a stark contrast in perspectives. Through this comprehensive comparative analysis, we gain insight into Blake's social critique and his ability to portray the complexities of human existence, particularly the plight of chimney sweepers in the societal landscape of his time.