To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
This essay explores the intricate dynamics of free trade in the global economy, focusing on the World Trade Organisation (WTO) and the Cancun ministerial round of negotiations. It delves into the advantages and disadvantages of free trade while providing an in-depth understanding of the WTO's functions. Additionally, this essay investigates the reasons behind the collapse of the Cancun ministerial round, offering a comprehensive analysis of the complex factors at play.
The World Trade Organisation, established nine years ago, serves as a critical international institution dedicated to promoting free trade by dismantling barriers such as import tariffs.
Its multifaceted role encompasses the management of trade agreements, monitoring international trade policy, and providing a platform for trade negotiations. The WTO's core objectives include global trade liberalisation through the universal reduction of tariffs, the establishment of uniform rules to govern all member nations, the encouragement of competition by reducing subsidies, and ensuring equitable trade recognition for all member states.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Free Essays
5 (893)
“ Thank you so much for accepting my assignment the night before it was due. I look forward to working with you moving forward ”
Furthermore, the WTO actively extends technical support and training to developing countries, striving to enhance transparency by mandating members to report their trade laws and measures as they come into effect (Moore, J. 2003).
Free trade, characterized by the absence of governmental barriers hindering the flow of goods and services between trading nations, offers numerous benefits. Trade barriers, such as tariffs and subsidies, often protect domestic producers but can divert trade flows instead of creating them (Edge, K. 2000).
Free trade fosters economic and political interdependence among countries, providing a robust foundation for collaboration (Balaam, D.N.
& Veseth, M. 2001).
One of the fundamental advantages of free trade is its capacity to enable countries to focus on producing goods in which they possess a comparative advantage. This strategy enhances efficiency through economies of scale and increased output, leading to lower average costs and heightened productivity. Moreover, free trade optimizes resource allocation, resulting in higher productivity and increased domestic output of goods and services. It also yields foreign exchange gains, as countries exporting their goods receive hard currency, which is then used to acquire cheaper imports from overseas. Increased competition incentivizes the adoption of new production methods, technologies, marketing, and distribution strategies (Edge, K. 2000).
Nations engaging in free trade typically experience elevated living standards, augmented real incomes, and accelerated rates of economic growth (Edge, K. 2000).
While free trade offers numerous advantages, it is not without its drawbacks. Structural unemployment may arise in the short term as trade barriers are removed. Additionally, free trade can expose domestic economies to increased vulnerability due to international trade cycles, as excessive dependence on the global market can lead to instability. International markets are not always a level playing field, with some countries flooding global markets with goods below cost, making it challenging for certain industries to compete for extended periods (Edge, K. 2000).
Developing or emerging industries may struggle to gain recognition in a highly competitive environment without short-term protection policies from their governments. Furthermore, free trade can contribute to environmental problems when companies fail to incorporate environmental costs into the pricing of their goods (Edge, K. 2000).
The collapse of the Cancun Ministerial Round of the World Trade Organisation on September 14, 2003, marked a significant turning point in international trade negotiations. The Cancun round witnessed a contentious breakdown in discussions, with African, Caribbean, and Pacific (ACP) countries refusing to engage in further talks, citing concerns about the undemocratic, non-transparent, and anti-development nature of the system for developing nations (Symington, A. 2003).
The collapse of the Cancun talks can be attributed to a confluence of factors. A prevailing atmosphere of cynicism, delusion, and incompetence permeated the negotiations. Countries exhibited a lack of trust in one another, primarily pursuing their individual economic interests instead of cooperative efforts to alleviate poverty, inequality, and human rights violations globally. The failure to implement changes aimed at democratizing the WTO's decision-making processes, despite calls for reform since the Seattle Ministerial in 1999, further eroded trust (Symington, A. 2003).
The role of the United States and the European Union also played a pivotal role in the talks' collapse. Both entities resisted significant reductions in agricultural subsidies while pressuring developing countries to lower their tariffs. This approach contradicted the "open consensus" principle outlined in the Doha Declaration and demonstrated their self-interest and uncompromising stance (Symington, A. 2003).
Additionally, the Cancun discussions were hindered by their shaky foundation. The Doha Declaration set an initially fragile agenda, and a lack of consensus on the round's objectives and the best means to achieve development in global South countries significantly impeded progress (Symington, A. 2003).
The solidarity and strength demonstrated by the global South during Cancun proved instrumental. Trade ministers engaged in bilateral and multilateral meetings before the conference, often accompanied by parliamentarians and policy experts from NGOs as part of their official delegations. This support was bolstered by widespread denunciations of the draft text by NGOs and activists worldwide, further empowering the delegates from developing countries (Symington, A. 2003).
The developing countries held firm in their positions, advocating against the introduction of new issues, demanding substantial reductions in domestic agricultural subsidies in affluent nations, and seeking special protections for strategically important products. Their commitment to improving the lives of the impoverished, coupled with a reluctance to compromise on principles, underpinned the impasse. While agricultural issues and discussions on the "Singapore Issues" appeared to be the immediate causes of the talks' failure, it was the resolute stance of the Southern countries against further detrimental compromises that lay at the heart of the deadlock (Symington, A. 2003).
Furthermore, the collapse of the Cancun talks reflected a global reevaluation of the neoliberal model and its policies. Over the past two decades, trade liberalization, privatization, deregulation, and other market-based measures have failed to foster development. Many countries have witnessed increasing poverty, hunger, and human rights violations. This stark reality drew diverse groups, including farmers, students, and women, to Cancun, encouraging them to participate in the ministerial. Governments were compelled to uphold their positions and resist the demands of affluent countries, reflecting a shift in the global discourse towards values and governance. People and NGOs now view food as a basic human right, jobs as a means to achieve dignified living, and governance as a mechanism that must prioritize the needs of the marginalized and disadvantaged. This shifting consensus is causing cracks in the existing system (Symington, A. 2003).
In conclusion, Cancun marked a critical juncture in the quest for a more equitable multilateral system focused on the well-being of global society. Developing countries exhibited resilience in the face of pressure from wealthier nations, who primarily prioritized their own economic interests. The outcome of this alliance's choice to stand firm against the global economic powers remains uncertain. Only time will reveal whether their statement resonated with the developed countries and whether it heralds the beginning of a more equitable and just international trade landscape.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Free Trade: An Analysis of the WTO. (2021, Sep 26). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/the-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-free-trade-in-the-global-economy-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
