Decoding "The Walrus and the Carpenter" by Lewis Carroll

Lewis Carroll's "The Walrus and the Carpenter" has long been considered a nonsensical rhyme, seemingly crafted for mere entertainment. However, beneath the whimsical surface lies a potential depth that transcends mere amusement. Despite Carroll's own disclaimer that he may not have intended anything beyond nonsense, the nature of his work, coupled with his own enigmatic persona, invites readers to explore hidden meanings. As Carroll remarked, words often carry unintended depths, and a literary work might harbor significances beyond the author's conscious intent (Shaw).

This essay endeavors to delve into the multifaceted layers of interpretation, exploring possible allegories, political satires, and societal critiques embedded within this seemingly frivolous poem.

The Elusive Meanings: A Canvas for Interpretation

One of the intriguing aspects of Carroll's work is its susceptibility to diverse interpretations. Each reader can uncover a unique narrative concealed within the verses, and one prevalent analysis suggests a subtle critique of religion and its adherents. The Carpenter, representing Christianity due to the association with Jesus Christ, might be seen as a symbolic portrayal.

Get quality help now

RhizMan

Verified writer

Proficient in: Symbolism

4.9 (247)

“ Rhizman is absolutely amazing at what he does . I highly recommend him if you need an assignment done ”

+84 relevant experts are online

Hire writer

However, Carroll's choice of the carpenter was arbitrary, merely dictated by poetic meter considerations rather than intentional religious commentary. Could "The Walrus and The Carpenter" then be a veiled political satire, shedding light on the socio-political landscape of Carroll's time? Are these characters emblematic of capitalistic politicians and their unquestioning followers? This popular interpretation merits a more profound examination.

Decoding Symbolism: The Sun, Moon, and Political Landscape

Carroll initiates the poem with the sun attempting to pierce through the darkness, a symbol believed to represent Carroll himself (De Rooy).

This luminous metaphor signifies Carroll's aspiration to enlighten readers and unveil the corruption and flaws permeating society. The nocturnal presence of the sun underscores Carroll's perspective on a society enshrouded in darkness, where his metaphorical light seeks to penetrate the prevailing obscurity. The moon, personified as a female figure upset by the sun's intrusion, mirrors the reigning monarch, Queen Victoria. This allegorical portrayal subtly criticizes the government's exploitation of its subjects, benefiting from their ignorance.

Political Puppets and Nonsensical Rhetoric

The seemingly unrelated characters of the Walrus and the Carpenter emerge, symbolizing verbose and duplicitous politicians plaguing the British government. Their emotional reaction to the vast expanse of sand reflects the politicians' relentless pursuit of progress without comprehending the consequences. The futile plan to clear the beach becomes a metaphor for politicians' often misguided attempts to stimulate economic growth. The oysters, innocent and naive, represent the common British citizens swayed by political rhetoric. The Walrus's eloquent speech, covering trivial topics like shoes, ships, and sealing-wax, satirizes politicians' ability to captivate audiences with irrelevant discourse.

Tragic Irony and Political Deceit

The tragic irony unfolds as the Carpenter, seemingly kind, lures the oysters into a perilous journey. Carroll astutely comments on the populace's blind trust in politicians, thanking them for perceived kindness while being oblivious to their ulterior motives. The Walrus's remorseful display after devouring the oysters reflects the insincerity of politicians who, despite causing harm, feign sympathy. Carroll's portrayal serves as a cautionary tale, warning readers to be wary of false promises and political deceit prevalent in both government and the governed.

The Nonsensical Landscape: A Reflection of Society's Ills

While all are gathered at the rock, the oysters ask if they can rest before they start doing anything else. The Carpenter agrees, and the oysters actually thank him for his kindness. Cruel irony in regards to what the Carpenter then does to the innocent oysters. Carroll is remarking on the way that people believe their politicians are doing what is best for them when in actuality, the politicians are only acting in their own best interests.

The Walrus comments on how it would be a terrible trick to play on the oysters, to bring them all the way out on the beach to their demise after promising them a pleasant walk. The Carpenter offers no reply to this statement and only mentions the butter on his bread is spread too thick. The Walrus and the Carpenter devour one by one the horrified oysters, leaving no survivors to warn others of the tragic event that has taken place. The Walrus seems to feel bad about what happened to the oysters without considering he caused it. He sheds meaningless tears and sobs uncontrollably.

"I weep for you," the Walrus said:?"I deeply sympathize."?With sobs and tears he sorted out?Those of the largest size,?Holding his pocket-handkerchief?Before his streaming eyes. (Carroll 97-102 qtd. in Shaw) After all was said and done, the Walrus and the Carpenter did what would make them happy regardless of how it affected others. They can tell themselves they cared for the oysters and shed false tears, but they ate them all without even realizing it.

Conclusion: A Nonsensical Mirror to Society

In conclusion, Lewis Carroll's ostensibly nonsensical poem, "The Walrus and the Carpenter," unveils layers of social and political commentary. Far beyond a mere amusement for young readers, the poem serves as a mirror reflecting the flaws of government and society. Carroll's intricate use of symbolism and allegory invites readers to question the motivations of politicians and the unquestioning obedience of the populace. Whether intentional or not, Carroll's work resonates with timeless themes, cautioning against blind trust and urging readers to discern the deeper meanings within the nonsensical verses.

As we navigate through Carroll's whimsical world, it becomes evident that "The Walrus and the Carpenter" is not merely a fanciful rhyme but a potent vehicle for social critique. Its enduring relevance encourages readers to scrutinize contemporary political landscapes and question the narratives presented by those in power. In this pursuit of deciphering Carroll's multifaceted creation, we are reminded that the true beauty of nonsensical literature lies in its capacity to inspire contemplation and provoke thoughtful reflection.

Carroll's seemingly nonsensical poem is indeed a rich tapestry of satire, a critique of both government and its governed. Through the lens of this whimsical tale, readers are prompted to scrutinize their own societies and question the seemingly absurd actions of those in authority. The multifaceted layers of interpretation offer a nuanced exploration of political deceit, blind trust, and the consequences of unchecked power. As we engage with "The Walrus and the Carpenter," we embark on a journey beyond the surface of nonsense into a realm of profound societal reflection.