Download paper

Student Unrest in Nigerian Universities


Trainee discontent; trainee services; student workers administration; universities


The authors took a look at the policies and aspects that have in the past and at the present precipitated student discontent in Nigerian university campuses.

Predictions about the policies that are most likely to produce trainee protest in Nigerian university campuses in the future are advanced. Nigerian greater educational organization is developed with the objective of offering any student who enrolls, an extremely sound and qualitative education, to be able to work successfully in any environment in which he/she might discover him/ herself; so regarding become more productive, self-fulfilling and attain self-actualization (Federal Government of Nigeria, 1981).

Under the Nigerian Policy on Education of 1977, modified in 1981, higher education targets at: (a) the acquisition advancement and inculcation of the appropriate value– orientation for the survival of the individual and society; (b) the advancement of the intellectual capabilities of individuals to comprehend and value their environments; (c) the acquisition of both physical and intellectual skills which will enable individuals to establish into mindful members of the neighborhood; and (d) the acquisition of an unbiased view of the local and external environment (Fafunwa, 1991).

Specifically, Nigerian universities are expected to pursue the above mentioned goals through: (i) teaching, (ii) research, (iii) dissemination of existing and new information (especially through publication); and (iv) the pursuit of service to the community and being a store house of knowledge (Fafunwa, 1991; Federal Government of Nigeria, 1981). Despite the above stipulations, research (i. e. , Akinade, 1993; Aluede and Aluede 1999; Aluede, 2000;

Ehiametalor, 1979; Nwokwule, 1992; Tawari, 1986; Yalokwu, 1992) does indicate that many of Nigerian universities are finding it increasingly difficult to achieve the highlighted goals because of the many attendant problems that they are made to face.

Top Experts
Prof. Laser
Verified expert
4.8 (435)
Verified expert
4.9 (247)
Writer Lyla
Verified expert
5 (876)
hire verified expert

These difficulties are largely due to the problems which students who enroll these institutions either face or cause irrespective of their home backgrounds (Tawari, 1986). These problems make students’ life within and outside Nigerian university campuses, frequently a traumatic experience; which is the major reason why students of various Nigerian university campuses frequently demand an overhaul of the entire system (Tawari, 1986).

Today, in Nigeria, students’ militancy in the Nigerian universities has come to be recognised as one of the most visible perennial problems of significance when compared with other social vices in Nigeria university campuses like campus cult activities, cases of examination malpractices, and drug abuse and addiction. Such that in the history of Nigeria, no group has established itself more in terms in frequency and intensity of such violent incidents as the student population.

Hence, unrest is proving to be one of the most ubiquitous single factors characterizing these members of the society (Nwokwule, 1992). The intent of this paper is threefold: (a) to state the issues that had in the past precipitated student unrest in Nigeria; (b) current issues in student unrest; and (c) issues that are likely to generate student unrest in Nigerian universities in the near future.


In Nigeria, cases of student unrest were reported as far back as 1945. Ezera 1960 (as cited in Onwuejeogwu, 1991) posits that between 1940 and 1945, the West Africa Students Union (WASU) had agitated in pamphlets and public lectures for political reforms in all British West African territories.

In doing so, they aroused a fairly enthusiastic audience of the British public opinion in favour of Africa freedom. Similarly, Ajuluchukwu 1962 (as cited in Onwuejeogwu, 1991) note that from the inception, the National Union of Nigerian Students (NUNS) embarked upon deliberate campaigns of fostering national consciousness and inspiring a strong sense of militancy in the Nigerian people’s liberation struggle (Aluede, 1995; Babatope, 1974).

Babatope (1974) and Onwuejeogwu (1991) note that the students’ union was born and nurtured in the womb of colonial protest. Hence student unionism was more of a protest union rather than student union, which was aimed at far reaching changes in the society. One incident of student unrest in 1960 was essentially due to students’ dissatisfaction with government insensitivity to national issues, and its inability to address them appropriately.

Nigerian students aware of the British government’s intention to establish a military base in Nigeria and by so doing perpetuate a neo-colonial state, decided to stage a protest against the Table 1: Incidents of student unrest in Nigeria Year 1981 1984 Institutions Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria Many Nigerian tertiary institutions Many Universities in Nigeria Many Nigerian Universities Several schools In many parts of Nigeria proposed Anglo-Nigerian Defence pact in Lagos on November 14, 1960. Another incident was students’ dissatisfaction with newly introduced educational policies.

Before independence, only mature students were admitted into the few existing tertiary institutions. Although, they paid minimal fees, their clothes, including bedding were laundered at government expense. At independence, and thereafter, there occurred an explosion in student population and proliferation of higher education, which brought in its train a teeming population of adolescents (Ehiametalor, 1979). Added to this, was the withdrawal of tuition fees in all tertiary institutions in Nigeria. This act of the government led to the 1978 student crisis “Ali Must Go”.

Since these events, students have used several opportunities to express their grievances. Table 1 below indicates a very brief sketch of the prevalence of student unrest in Nigeria. It is evident from the table1, that protest and unrest are regular features in Nigerian tertiary institutions.


Revolts, protests, unrests and violence, as well as incessant closure of schools for months in the wake of unrest or protest have become a Consequences Student died and Vice-Chancellor dismissed.

Many Universities were closed down for months Most Universities in Nigeria were closed down for months. While several students were expelled. Many schools were closed for a period of Six months. Improved conditions of service for workers closure of several institution for about six months. Many students lost their lives during the protest as a result of open shooting by Police/Army Several students died, workers’ conditions of service were improved, while several schools were closed for months Violent leading to the death many students Peaceful in some campuses violent in others 1986 1988 1989.

Stated Causes of Unrest Religion and against ViceChancellor over alleged Rice deal Proposed introduction of tuition fees and the scrapping of catering services High handedness of the Vice-Chancellor of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria Removal of subsidy from petroleum and allied products Introduction of Structural Adjustment Program (SAP) by the military Government 1992 Many Universities in Nigeria Ambrose Alli Uni. , Ekpoma, Nigeria Many universities in Nigeria 1998 2003 Deregulations of Nigerian currency and mounting hardship Cult Activities increase in the prices of petroleum products


In the past, the values of students were personal development, service to others, and the like. But conceivably, these values are now being discarded and replaced by those of: orientation for security, success discarded and replaced by orientation for security, success as all cost, massive acquisition of wealth by any means and attainment of enviable status in the society by whatever means. It is also reported (i. e. , Aluede and Aluede, 1999; Aluede, 2001; Ojo, 1995; Uzoka, 1993) that students no longer demonstrate about trivialities but have graduated into a higher plane of demands.

Students these days are rarely concerned with improving their conditions and are easily motivated to identify with movements that fight the oppression of others. For example, the annulment of June 12, 1993 Presidential Elections in Nigeria, elicited at various times violent demonstrations from students in several tertiary institutions and even gained support from other tertiary institutions around the world (Ojo, 1995). Thus, the patterns of student protests have now changed and burning political and national issues take the central stage (Nwokwule, 1992).


It is very clear from records that the issues, which have over the years resulted in student unrest in higher educational institutions, have had a clear consistence overtime (Brown, 1992). For example, students’ life issues such as, students involvement in decision-making process especially in matters affecting them, the impact of discipline system of students, provision of good and adequate support services for majority of the students, have ever been present components in students’ activism.

Other issues have been government policies and actions, government engagement in war and peace keeping missions, social unrest, absence of welfare amenities, such as, residential facilities for a sizeable number of students, academic stress, etc, have constantly been issues that have largely dominated student protest actions in higher educational institutions (Altbach and Cohen, 1990; Novak, 1977; Ojo, 1995). Funding of education in Nigeria is an issue that is likely to generate student unrest in the near future.

Funding of universities in Nigeria has for over twenty years (beginning from the period Nigeria adopted Austerity Measure in regular feature of Nigerian universities. Today, if there were any thing most predictable about Nigerian universities is that the students who are enrolled in them would riot in any academic semester or academic year. Such incessant incidents of unrest seem to affect the scope of areas being covered and the content of courses in the school curriculum (Aluede, 1995; Aluede, 2001).

A cursory look at Nigerian universities reveals that several issues precipitate student unrest in recent times. These issues include students’ nonparticipation in decision – making processes in the university. Accordingly, the degree of students’ involvement in the decision-making processes has been recognised to be inversely related to the frequency of student unrest. Hence, greater involvement of students in decisionmaking processes may probably reduce the frequency of campus unrest (Aluede, 2001; Ojo, 1995).

This is because students would be seen to be working against policies they had helped to formulate. Academic stress is another factor that precipitates student unrest in Nigerian universities, which is attributable in many direct ways to the mounting academic pressures and stresses (Aluede, 1996; Denga, 1982, 1993; Emenyonu, 1991; Keniston, 1967; Sampson, 1967). These stressors include overcrowded hostels and lecture halls, lecture halls and common rooms now turned (by some students who are not accommodated in the residential halls) into residential apartments.

Welfare problems brought about by lack of basic amenities are another factor currently producing student unrest in Nigerian universities. The inadequate hostel accommodation; unsatisfactory supply of food and catering services; overcrowded lecture halls and hostels; lack of financial aid and poor sanitary conditions tend to make students’ campus life and experience a very traumatic one. Students studying under these dehumanizing conditions tend to lose sleep, lose concentration and as a result, may behave in manners not generally approved by the authorities their institutions (Aluede and Aluede, 1999; Uzoka 1993; Yalokwu, 1992).

Students in Nigerian tertiary institutions now have values that are generationally at variance with those of the adults who are in charge of the administration of the campuses. These students make demands that the socio-economic climate of the larger society cannot satisfy (Animba, 20 OYAZIWO ALUEDE, BASIL JIMOH, BEATRICE O. AGWINEDE AND EUNICE O. OMOREGIE 1982) depreciated a great deal. Contrary to UNESCO stipulation that governments of developing countries allocate a minimum of 26 percent of their annual budget on education, the Federal Government of Nigeria allocated 5.

3 percent and 1. 083 percent of the annual budget to all levels of education during the 2002 and 2003 fiscal years. Thus, poor funding has led the facilities to deteriorate to a very near frightening /appalling level. Today, universities are not able to maintain their basic facilities, to the extent that the laboratories, libraries, accommodation facilities available for students and the lecture halls are in a very deplorable condition. Specifically, the libraries can no longer subscribe to current books and periodicals.

All these lead students to contemplate about the future security and existence of these universities; and their ability to provide quality education. Connected with the above, is the staff’s (particularly academic staff) fear about the security of their employment. With poor funding, staff are continuously going to experience poor remuneration and the inability of these universities to settle their monthly salaries. Apart from salaries, universities in Nigeria will find it difficult to provide necessary environment for effective teaching, research and dissemination of existing and new information (including publications).

Universities will find it difficult to sponsor their academic staff for either local or international conferences, undertake the sponsorship of staff publications or even assist staff in the payment of publication costs for articles accepted in self-supporting refereed journals. These appalling conditions are likely going to make many Nigerian universities’ staff to further relocate. Although many are already scattered around Southern and Eastern African universities, with others in Europe and North America, if these prevailing conditions remain unchecked, many are likely to join the train.

Thus, brain drain is likely to top the agenda of student protest actions in the near future. Government plan to commercialize the university system in Nigeria, which if fully implemented, will make all universities to be self-sustaining. By this plan, the government will have hands off from the practice of sending monthly subvention (to cater for workers’ monthly emoluments, maintenance of infrastructures, capital development, provision of welfare facilities for both staff and students, etc.

) to take care of the day-to-day administration of such university. In that case, universities will be left with no option other than to charge students exorbitant fees to keep the universities alive. Given the basic fact that majority of Nigerian students come from poor backgrounds, many of these students will certainly not be able to meet the new school fees requirement and may be forced to withdraw, while others are likely to vehemently oppose this new policy of the government.

The federal government of Nigeria’s frequent increase of petroleum products and intended desire to fully deregulate petroleum products, thus making market forces decide the pump price, which will lead vehicle operators to pay exorbitant amount for petroleum products is very likely to generate students’ violent reaction. Students are the group most vulnerable to the hardship that will arise from this increase in petroleum products especially now that no university in Nigeria has a functional transportation system in place for the students.

Another issue that is likely to generate student crisis is that of the proposed privatization of the National Electric Power Authority (the sole agency that provides electricity for the country) and the Nigerian Telecommunication (the sole agency that provides telephone and allied services for Nigerians). Students believe that with such privatization, the amount payable to enjoy their services will drastically shoot up.

If considered from the point of view that today we talk of information technology, students would need electricity and functional telecommunication services to be able to carry out their research efforts with little difficulty. They would need to surf the Internet, communicate with other students and experts through e-mail communication, carryout an exhaustive literature search, etc. All these will certainly rely on the services provided by the agencies in charges of electricity and telecommunications. When they are privatized, their charges will be too much for the students to bear.

Students therefore are very likely to adopt much uncivilized means to seek redress. Students’ demand for participatory democracy, especially on matters affecting their academic life are likely to continue and even be on the increase. Although the demand has been an on going matter (Aluede, 1995, 2001), we are going to find that such demand is going to be intense. This development will not be too surprising because students are observing the military presence in Sierra-Leone, and Liberia. It is on record that Nigerian government singlehandedly provided all the funds for the Economic

of West African States Monitoring Group (ECOMOG) – a military unit set-up by the Economic Union of West African States – to quell the crisis in some of its member states. The other issue has to do with Nigerian government’s regular funding of the Technical Aid Scheme (providing other developing nations with highly skilled manpower from Nigeria, with the Nigerian government bearing all the financial responsibilities of the assistance-salaries, travels and health services). Even with all these generous assistance to other nations, Nigerian universities today are still in a very sorrowful state, which is resulting from under funding.

Students believe that the under funding of universities in Nigeria is only a deliberate attempt to under educate them. Students are likely to believe that the government is rich enough, judging from its generosity to other developing nations by provision of technical support, to be able to provide all that universities would require for effective learning/administration. It is very likely that this issue shall continue to be one of the issues that may precipitate students’ activism in the near future.


It is imperative to recognize those issues that are likely to generate campus unrest, especially in the subsequent decades of the millennium: student campus life issues; poor funding of Nigerian universities by the government; and withdrawal of subsidy from petroleum products. In appreciation of the potential issues that would generate student protests in the near future, student services professional would be challenged to evolve strategies that would help to bring the incidents of student unrest in Nigerian universities to the barest minimum.

“Counselling intervention strategies benefits of democracy in the larger community and would believe that an extension of that to the university campuses will afford them an opportunity to reap from the dividends of democracy. With the ever-increasing enrollment of students in Nigerian universities and the increase in the number of universities from only six in 1970 to fifty-three in 2003, the potential base of student’s power has expanded to an unprecedented level.

In addition, with the increase in students’ enrolment in Nigerian universities, essentially due to the proliferation of admission policies and introduction of diploma and predegree courses (which originally are not the statutory responsibilities of the universities), the campuses now witness the presence of several adolescents many of them are most of the time experiencing adolescent crisis (Nwokwule, 1992), usually translated in violent protests against superior significant others Over education and underemployment of university graduates is likely to generate student unrest in Nigerian university campuses in the near future.

In the past, acquiring a university degree meant automatic employment at any level in the Nigerian public service. Such employment attracted better incentives like car loans and housing loan (which were to be repaid over a very long period with very minimal interest rate), annual overseas holidays for self and family, medical services for self and family, etc. In Nigeria today, acquiring a university degree no longer guarantees any gainful and attractive position in the public service.

More perplexing is the newly introduced National Poverty Alleviation Scheme by the Federal Government of Nigeria, where by graduates are employed on a monthly salary of ten thousand Naira only (N10, 000. 00) which is the salary a clerical assistant (secondary school certificate holder) earns in the public service. Even at that, this employment is usually for two years only. The question often asked is what becomes of the graduate at the expiration of the two years contract. Thus, being over educated or underemployed, which is a prevailing condition could culminate into a full-fledged outburst in Nigerian university campuses.

Potential issues that would likely to generate student unrest in Nigerian universities in the near future are increased involvement of the Nigerian government in peacekeeping missions abroad. Students believe that a lot of national resources are being wasted in supporting /sponsoring.


  • Akinade, E. A. 1993. “Guidance and Counselling Strategies for Preventing or Controlling Students Activism in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions”. pp 130 – 138. in O. Animba, D. Denga and P. F. Omoluabi (eds. ), An Appraisal of Student Unrest in Nigeria. Enugu, Nigeria: AB/C Publishers.
  • Aluede, O. O. 1995. Factors Influencing Student Unrest in Tertiary Institutions in Edo State of Nigeria. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Benin, Benin-City, Nigeria. Aluede, O.O. 1996.
  • OYAZIWO ALUEDE, BASIL JIMOH, BEATRICE O. AGWINEDE AND EUNICE O. OMOREGIE Fafunwa, A. B. 1991. History of Education in Nigeria (New Edition). Ibadan, Nigeria: NPS Educational Publishers Ltd. Federal Republic of Nigeria . 1981. National Policy on Education (Revised Edition). Lagos: Federal Ministry of Information Press.
  • Keniston, K. 1967. “The Sources of Student Dissent”. Journal of Social Issues, 23: 108 – 137. Levine, A. 1981. “The College Student: A Changing Constituency”. pp 239 – 251. in P. G. Altbach and R. O. Berdahl (eds. ), Higher Education in American Society. Buffalo, NY: Prometheus.
  • Novak, S. J. 1977. The Rights of Youth: American Colleges 1798 – 1815. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Nwokwule, I. N. S. 1992. “Emerging Culture of Violence among Nigerian Students: A psychological Analysis”. pp 18 – 26. in C. Maduka (ed. ), Student Unrest. Benin-City, Nigeria: Faculty of Education, University of Benin.
  • Ojo, J. D. 1995. Student’s Unrest in Nigerian Universities: A Legal and Historical Approach. Ibadan, Nigeria: Spectrum Books Ltd. Onwuejeogwu, M. A. 1992. “The Social Basis of Students’ Unrest in Nigeria”. pp 1 – 8. in C. Maduka (ed. ), Student Unrest. Benin-City, Nigeria: Faculty of Education, University of Benin.
  • Sampson, E. E. 1967. “Student Activism and the Decade of Protest” Journal of Social Issues, 23: 1 – 33.
  • Tawari, O. C. 1986. A Study of the Perceived Adequacy of Student Support Services in Nigerian Universities. Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, University of Benin, Benin-city, Nigeria. Uzoka, A.
  • F. 1993. “Social and Psychological Factors in Current Student Behaviour”. pp 50 – 64. in O. Animba, D. Denga and P. F. Omoluabi (eds. ), An Appraisal of Student Unrest in Nigeria. Enugu, Nigeria: ABIC Publishers.
  • Venables, P. 1978. Higher Education Development: The Technological Universities, 1956 – 1976 . London: Faber and Faber Publishing Company.
  • Whawo, D. D. 1991, May. ” An Application of System Approach for the Synthesis of Solution to the Problem of Student Crisis”. A lecture delivered during the 1990/91 Student Union Week, College of Education, Agbor, Delta State, Nigeria.
  • Yalokwu, P. O. 1992. “University Leadership and the Management of Student Indiscipline” (pp 69 – 78) in C. Maduka (ed. ), Student Unrest. Benin-City: Faculty of Education, University of Benin, Nigeria. in curbing student unrest in Nigerian tertiary institutions”. Journal of Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(4): 24-28
  • Aluede, O. O. 1997. “The Role of the Guidance Counsellor in Curbing Student Unrest in Nigerian University Campuses”. Guidance & Counselling, 13(1): 25 29.
  • Aluede, O. O. 1998. “Attitude of the Faculty towards Student Unrest”. Journal of Higher Education, 21(1): 93 – 100.
  • Aluede, R. O. A. and O. O. Aluede. 1999. “Student Unrest in Nigerian Universities”. Journal of Educational Planning and Administration, 13: 337 – 344.
  • Aluede, O. O. 2000. “An Analysis of the Attitude of University Students towards Campus Unrest”. The Progress of Education, 74: 154 -160.
  • Aluede, O. O. 2001. “Factors Influencing Student unrest in Tertiary Institutions in Edo State of Nigeria”. Educational Research Quarterly, 24 (3): 10 – 26.
  • Aluede, O. O and I. O. C. Adomeh. 2002. “A perspective into student politics in Nigerian universities: A review”. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 1(1): 79 – 87
  • Altbach, P. G. and R. Cohen. 1990. “American Student Activism: The Post-sixties Transformation”. Journal of Higher Education, 61: 32 – 49.
  • Animba, O. 1993. “Campus Secret Cults in Nigeria”. pp 90 – 107. in O. Animba, D. Denga and P. F. Omoluabi (eds. ), An Appraisal of Student Unrest in Nigeria. Enugu, Nigeria: ABIC Publishers.
  • Babatope, O. E. 1974. ”Student Power in Nigeria: 1960 – 1970″. Yaba, Lagos: Media Services.
  • Brown, P. 1992. Those who make History: A Portrait of Contemporary Student Activists. Unpublished D. Ed. Dissertation, University of Vermont, Vermont.
  • Denga, D. I. 1982. Student Counselling: A Major Solution to Campus Unrest. Lagos, Nigeria: Orit Egwa Ltd.
  • Denga, D. I. 1993. “Student counselling as a major Solution to Campus Unrest in Nigeria”. pp 139 148. in O. Animba, D. Denga and P. F. Omoluabi (eds. ), An Appraisal of Student Unrest in Nigeria. Enugu, Nigeria: ABIC Publishers.
  • Ehiametalor, E. T. 1979. The Analysis of Student Protest Behaviour and Perceived Conflict Management Ability of Nigerian University Administrators. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Texas South University, Houston, Texas.
  • Emenyonu, E. N. 1991, March. “Facets of Students’ Academic Activities”. Paper presented at the 14th Annual Committee of Vice-Chancellors Seminar, held at University of Benin, Benin – City, Nigeria.

Cite this page

Student Unrest in Nigerian Universities. (2016, Oct 25). Retrieved from

Student Unrest in Nigerian Universities
Are You on a Short Deadline? Let a Professional Expert Help You
Let’s chat?  We're online 24/7