To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
Self-perception theory (SPT), developed by psychologist Daryl Bem, offers a unique perspective on attitude change. Unlike conventional wisdom, which posits that attitudes precede behaviors, SPT proposes that individuals form attitudes by observing their own actions and then deducing the attitudes that must have driven those actions. This theory challenges the notion that attitudes are solely a product of internal cognitions and mood states, suggesting that individuals rationalize their overt behaviors in a manner similar to how they explain the actions of others.
In this essay, we will delve into the key concepts of self-perception theory, explore its experimental foundations, and discuss its implications in psychology and everyday life.
SPT's departure from the traditional sequence of attitude formation is indeed counterintuitive. It posits that individuals develop attitudes through the observation of their own actions, essentially inferring what attitudes drove those behaviors. This implies that people can induce attitudes without accessing their internal cognitive processes and mood states. In essence, individuals reason about their own overt behaviors much in the same way they analyze the actions of others.
Daryl Bem conducted a seminal experiment to investigate whether individuals truly induce their attitudes by observing their behaviors, even without direct access to their internal states.
In this study, participants engaged in interpersonal simulations, where they played the role of "observer-participants." They were provided with a detailed description of one condition of a cognitive dissonance experiment. Specifically, participants listened to a recording of a man expressing enthusiastic endorsement for a tedious peg-turning task.
Notably, two groups of participants were given different information: one group was informed that the man had been paid $20 for his testimonial, while the other group was told he received only $1.
Surprisingly, participants in the latter condition, who believed the man had received a mere $1, inferred that he must have genuinely enjoyed the task more compared to those in the $20 condition. The results echoed the findings of the original Festinger-Carlsmith experiment, reinforcing the idea that observers, devoid of access to the actors' internal cognition and emotional states, could accurately deduce the actors' true attitudes. This experiment provides compelling evidence that individuals may indeed arrive at their attitudes by observing their own behaviors.
It is crucial to highlight that the self-perception theory posits that attitude change occurs when two key factors are present:
Bem's work extended beyond the foundational experiment. In another study, self-perception theory was applied in an attempt to alleviate anxiety in college students, particularly those who experienced social anxiety or shyness. The study involved structured interactions between students of the opposite sex, with the goal of helping them overcome shyness by attributing their successful outcomes to their own behaviors. The results of this study demonstrated the effectiveness of the treatment for both sexes. Importantly, the positive effects proved to be relatively long-lasting, and participants reported finding the experience enjoyable.
Self-perception theory has garnered support from numerous studies conducted by psychologists, shedding light on the idea that emotions can indeed follow behaviors. For instance, research has shown that individuals reported corresponding emotions, such as liking, disliking, happiness, or anger, as a result of their overt behaviors. These behaviors were manipulated by experimenters, including the manipulation of facial expressions, gazes, and postures.
Remarkably, participants in these studies inferred and reported their affections and attitudes based on their practiced behaviors, despite being informed beforehand to act in a certain way. These findings align with the James-Lange theory of emotion, suggesting that individuals often attribute their emotional states to their behaviors.
Furthermore, real-life situations provide additional evidence for the self-perception theory. For example, when teenagers engage in repeated and sustained volunteer services, their attitudes tend to shift towards being more caring and considerate towards others. This shift exemplifies how individuals' behaviors can influence their attitudes, reinforcing the notion that actions can shape one's beliefs and emotions.
Self-perception theory holds significant implications for both therapeutic contexts and persuasion strategies.
One of the intriguing aspects of self-perception theory is its perspective on the root causes of psychological problems. While traditional viewpoints often attribute psychological issues to internal factors within the client, self-perception theory suggests that individuals derive their inner feelings and abilities from their external behaviors. In cases where maladjusted behaviors contribute to psychological problems, individuals may attribute these maladjustments to their poor adapting abilities, leading to the experience of corresponding psychological issues.
Therapies rooted in self-perception theory aim to treat clients by guiding them to first modify their behavior and subsequently address the associated psychological challenges. For example, therapy for "Hetero-Social Anxiety" operates on the assumption that individuals perceive their poor social skills as a result of having no romantic dates. Through therapeutic interventions involving structured interactions with individuals of the opposite sex, participants perceive a reduction in their anxiety. This perception of reduced anxiety, driven by altered behaviors, translates into more successful social interactions and, ultimately, a greater number of romantic dates.
Self-perception theory underlies the effectiveness of various marketing and persuasion strategies. The "foot-in-the-door" technique is a notable example. This widely employed marketing tactic aims to persuade individuals to make a purchase by first engaging them in a small, related action, such as filling out a brief questionnaire. Once individuals commit to this initial action, they are more likely to comply with a larger request connected to the original one, such as buying a related product. This technique operates on the premise that people observe their own behaviors (e.g., completing the questionnaire) and the context in which they engage in those behaviors (e.g., no obvious incentive), leading them to infer a preference for the products being promoted.
Despite the valuable insights provided by self-perception theory, it has faced challenges and criticisms, particularly in its comparison with cognitive dissonance theory, which posits that individuals experience a "negative drive state" called "dissonance" and seek to alleviate it by changing their attitudes.
An experiment conducted by Zanna and Cooper in 1974 aimed to differentiate between self-perception theory and cognitive dissonance theory. Participants were tasked with writing a counter-attitudinal essay and were divided into low-choice and high-choice conditions. Additionally, participants were given placebos with varying expectations of inducing tension, relaxation, or having no effect. Under the low-choice condition, all participants exhibited no attitude change, aligning with predictions from both cognitive dissonance theory and self-perception theory. However, in the high-choice condition, participants who expected the placebo to induce tension showed no attitude change, while those who anticipated relaxation experienced significant attitude change. This outcome could not be explained by self-perception theory, as arousal should not have influenced the mechanism of attitude change. Instead, cognitive dissonance theory offered a coherent explanation, suggesting that participants could attribute their discomfort to the placebo and, therefore, did not need to alter their attitudes.
While self-perception theory provides valuable insights into attitude change, it is essential to recognize that it is not a one-size-fits-all explanation and may not account for all situations where attitudes shift.
In conclusion, self-perception theory, proposed by Daryl Bem, offers a distinctive perspective on attitude change by asserting that individuals develop attitudes by observing their own behaviors and attributing attitudes to those actions. This theory challenges conventional wisdom and has been supported by experimental evidence demonstrating that behaviors can indeed shape attitudes and emotions. Self-perception theory has found practical applications in psychological therapy, particularly in addressing issues rooted in maladaptive behaviors, and in marketing and persuasion strategies like the foot-in-the-door technique.
However, it is crucial to acknowledge that self-perception theory is not without its challenges and has been debated in comparison to cognitive dissonance theory. Both theories provide valuable insights into attitude change, but their applicability may vary depending on the specific context. Nevertheless, self-perception theory remains a significant contribution to the field of psychology, offering a unique lens through which we can understand how our behaviors influence our attitudes and emotions.
Self-Perception Theory: Understanding Attitude Change. (2016, Oct 11). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/self-perception-theory-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment