Examining The Reliability of Human Sense Perception

The idiom "seeing is believing," first recorded in its current form in 1639, reflects a common sentiment in human life - the conviction that only physical or concrete evidence is truly convincing. We often adhere to the maxim, "until I see with my own eyes, I will not believe." This unwavering trust in our sensory perception of the world around us raises important questions about the accuracy and limitations of human sense perception.

The Subjectivity of Human Perception

Human beings are inherently reliant on their senses to navigate and make sense of the world.

However, it is essential to recognize that our senses are far from infallible. The accuracy of our sensory perception is intrinsically tied to our individual frames of reference, making it a subjective experience. While we may perceive our senses as providing us with objective information, the reality is more complex.

One significant factor contributing to the inaccuracy of human sense perception is the vast array of limitations that our senses possess.

Get quality help now
writer-marian
writer-marian
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Perception

star star star star 4.8 (309)

“ Writer-marian did a very good job with my paper, she got straight to the point, she made it clear and organized ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

These limitations stem from the inherent variability among individuals, as no two people are identical in their sensory abilities. Furthermore, some paradoxical situations highlight how individuals with certain sensory disabilities can possess a more accurate perception of reality than those with healthy sensory organs.

An intriguing example of this phenomenon is individuals with aphasia, a condition characterized by language impairment. Despite their difficulty in comprehending the linguistic content of spoken language, individuals with aphasia often excel in perceiving the truth through paralinguistic features and intonation cues. For them, the mere words of a sentence may make little sense, but the underlying truth remains accessible.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

This illustrates the intricate interplay between sensory perception and interpretation.

Limitations of Human Senses

The limitations of human senses are multifaceted and encompass various aspects of our perceptual experience:

  1. Field of Vision: A pair of healthy human eyes provides a total field of view of approximately two hundred degrees horizontally. Out of these, one hundred and twenty degrees are seen by both eyes, enabling binocular vision. In the vertical dimension, the field of vision encompasses approximately one hundred and thirty-five degrees. However, it is important to note that these values tend to decrease with age.
  2. Range of Perception: The normal human eye can perceive light within a specific range of wavelengths, approximately between 390 and 750 nanometers. This limited range means that there are portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, such as ultraviolet and infrared light, that escape our visual perception.
  3. Hearing Range: The human ear can detect sound frequencies within the range of about 20 to 20,000 Hz. Frequencies beyond this range remain beyond our auditory perception.

These limitations not only affect the range of sensory information we can access but also influence the quality and accuracy of our perceptions.

The Role of Illusions

Illusions play a significant role in demonstrating the fallibility of human sense perception. They highlight how our powers of attention are limited and require a degree of concentration before accurate perception can occur. Moreover, we exhibit selectivity in what we choose to focus on, often overlooking certain details or misinterpreting sensory information.

Furthermore, our perceptions are highly dependent on the conditions in our environment. For example, the appearance of an object, such as a vase, can change dramatically based on the lighting conditions. A vase that appears blue in a room illuminated by white light may appear black when the light source is changed to red. This illustrates how external factors can influence our sensory experiences.

Additionally, what we perceive is contingent on the relationship between the perceiver and the object of perception. For instance, the sun and the moon, although appearing as large balls in the sky, are known to be much larger celestial bodies. This disjunction between appearance and reality highlights the subjectivity of our sensory experiences.

The state of our sense organs and the health and sensitivity of our brains also play pivotal roles in shaping our perceptions. When alterations occur in the chemistry of the brain, it can lead to unusual sensory phenomena, further emphasizing the delicate balance in our perceptual processes.

Moreover, our expectations and past experiences significantly influence what we perceive. The cultural background and prior knowledge we possess can mold our interpretations of sensory information. Consequently, we tend to see what we are prepared to see, potentially leading to confirmation bias in our perceptions.

Lastly, our predisposition to see what others see, often referred to as social influence, can impact our perceptions. We may conform to the perceptions of those around us, further complicating the notion of objective reality.

Philosophical Perspectives on Sense Perception

The reliability of human sense perception has been a subject of philosophical inquiry for centuries. Two prominent philosophical stances, skepticism and empiricism, have sought to address this question.

Skepticism

Skepticism is a philosophical view that casts doubt on the possibility of knowing anything with absolute certainty or apprehending the world as it truly exists. It can be divided into two categories:

  1. Local Scepticism: This form of skepticism pertains to ordinary doubts that can be subject to verification. For instance, questions like, "Is that a bird or a plane?" fall under local skepticism, as they can be empirically investigated and resolved.
  2. Global Scepticism: Also known as philosophical doubt, global skepticism delves into more profound questions that cannot be easily subjected to empirical verification. An example of global skepticism is the contemplation of whether our senses are mistaken all the time, a question that transcends empirical validation.

Global skepticism invites contemplation of the nature of reality itself, reminiscent of themes explored in films like "The Matrix" and "Inception" (2010). These movies delve into the concept of detaching from reality, living within dreams, and the challenge of distinguishing dream from reality, offering intriguing perspectives on the limitations of human sense perception.

Empiricism

Empirist philosophers take a different stance, emphasizing that the primary source of knowledge is sensory experience. They contend that, within certain limits, we can rely on our senses to provide us with meaningful insights about the world. Empiricism posits that humans are born with prior knowledge but accumulate additional knowledge through sense-experience.

Within the framework of empiricism, there exists a distinction between primary and secondary qualities. Primary qualities refer to inherent properties of objects, such as size, shape, and position, which are considered to be objective and verifiable. In contrast, secondary qualities, encompassing attributes like color, taste, and temperature, are regarded as subjective because they depend on the sensory experiences and interpretations of individuals.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the idiom "seeing is believing" encapsulates a fundamental aspect of human cognition - the reliance on our senses for understanding the world. However, a closer examination reveals that the reliability of human sense perception is far from absolute. Our senses are inherently subjective, influenced by individual limitations, environmental factors, illusions, and social influences.

Philosophical perspectives on sense perception, ranging from skepticism's profound doubts to empiricism's trust in sensory experience, offer different lenses through which we can explore this complex topic. In navigating the terrain of human perception, it is crucial to acknowledge the nuanced interplay between the limitations of our senses and the quest for a deeper understanding of the world around us.

Updated: Jan 08, 2024
Cite this page

Examining The Reliability of Human Sense Perception. (2016, Oct 24). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/seeing-is-believing-essay

Examining The Reliability of Human Sense Perception essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment