The Satirical Discourse on English as an Official Language

Categories: Satire

The legislative move to make English the official language on August 1, 1996, spurred a critical examination of this decision. One notable critique emerged from Dennis Baron, a professor of English at the University of Illinois, through his essay "Don't Make English Official-Ban It Instead," published in the Washington Post on September 8, 1996. Baron provocatively argues against the officialization of English, employing satire to shed light on his concerns about the impurity of the language, its potential demise, and the contentious issue of ownership.

This essay delves into the nuances of Baron's satirical approach, analyzing its effectiveness in both defending and opposing the official English bill.

The Satirical Defense: Unveiling the Absurdity

Baron's satirical defense against the official English bill is characterized by overplayed humor and clever analogies. His assertion that "Even if the British are now our allies, there may be some benefit to banning English today" (Baron 870) exemplifies his tongue-in-cheek approach. By mockingly suggesting that banning English might be beneficial, Baron challenges the assumption that English should be the sole official language.

Get quality help now
Bella Hamilton
Bella Hamilton
checked Verified writer

Proficient in: Rhetoric

star star star star 5 (234)

“ Very organized ,I enjoyed and Loved every bit of our professional interaction ”

avatar avatar avatar
+84 relevant experts are online
Hire writer

This satirical element is effective in disarming the arguments in favor of the officialization of English, forcing proponents to reconsider the implications of their stance.

Another instance of Baron's humor surfaces when he facetiously mentions, "We wouldn’t have to worry about whose English to make official" (Baron 870). This quip is followed by a series of rhetorical questions highlighting the absurdity of choosing between different versions of English, whether it be "English of England or American English? Of Chicago or New York? Of Ross Perot or William F.

Get to Know The Price Estimate For Your Paper
Topic
Number of pages
Email Invalid email

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy. We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Write my paper

You won’t be charged yet!

Buckley?" (Baron 870). Through these exaggerated scenarios, Baron exposes the impracticality and divisiveness that could arise from officially designating one form of English.

The Satirical Critique: Challenges and Shortcomings

While Baron's satire effectively disarms proponents of the official English bill, it falls short when examined from the perspective of opposing opponents. One notable drawback is the lack of substantial evidence to support his claims. Despite the humor and clever rhetoric, Baron's argument could benefit from more empirical data and concrete examples to strengthen its persuasive impact. A more robust evidential foundation would lend greater credibility to his satire and make it more compelling for those who may be skeptical of his position.

Additionally, Baron's choice of a one-sided argument, while effective in satirizing the proponents of the official English bill, limits the overall persuasive power of his essay. A more balanced approach that considers potential benefits of officializing English, even if ultimately refuted, would make his satire more nuanced and accommodating to a broader audience. By addressing potential counterarguments, Baron would enhance the depth and completeness of his satirical discourse.

Conclusion: Navigating the Satirical Landscape

In conclusion, Dennis Baron's satirical exploration of the proposal to make English the official language offers a thought-provoking critique. His use of humor and clever analogies effectively challenges the assumptions underlying the push for officialization. While successful in disarming proponents of the official English bill, Baron's satire could benefit from a more robust evidential foundation and a more balanced consideration of opposing perspectives. In navigating the satirical landscape, Baron invites readers to reflect on the complexities of language, ownership, and the potential consequences of officially designating one form of English over another.

author
Written by Lucas Davis
Updated: Jan 18, 2024
Keep in mind: this is only a sample!
Updated: Jan 18, 2024
Cite this page

The Satirical Discourse on English as an Official Language. (2016, Oct 26). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/rhetorical-analysis-for-dennis-baron-essay

The Satirical Discourse on English as an Official Language essay
Live chat  with support 24/7

👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!

Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.

get help with your assignment