To install StudyMoose App tap and then “Add to Home Screen”
Save to my list
Remove from my list
As organizations grow, security becomes a paramount concern that demands careful consideration. When contemplating the type of security to implement, whether proprietary or contract-based, organizations must assess their intrinsic value and the necessity for safeguarding their assets against theft, vandalism, and destruction. This transition often shifts the conversation from "We possess valuable assets" to "How can we safeguard them?" Leadership faces the pivotal decision of how to protect their business's possessions. In this process, it is essential to weigh the pros and cons of both proprietary and contract security options, as each carries distinct advantages and disadvantages.
The ultimate choice hinges on factors such as management preferences and cost considerations.
Two security options present themselves, each with its unique characteristics and implications. One option grants maximum control to the organization, while the other offers a more hands-off approach. Moreover, the cost structures differ between the two. In one scenario, there exists a fixed cost, which may be substantial, while the other is more variable and depends on factors like office capabilities and the number of personnel hired.
Verified writer
Proficient in: Business
4.7 (348)
“ Amazing as always, gave her a week to finish a big assignment and came through way ahead of time. ”
Having identified the problem and potential solutions, we must now delve into the outcomes, advantages, and disadvantages associated with each option to discern the best fit for the organization. Additionally, we will explore how the choice between proprietary and contract security impacts consistency, effectiveness, and obligation.
The cost of implementing proprietary security is a significant factor to contemplate. Organizations that opt for proprietary security must bear the expenses of employee benefits and higher salaries for their security personnel.
Proprietary security positions typically offer more attractive compensation packages, attracting a higher caliber of security professionals. In contrast, contract security firms usually maintain lower salaries for their personnel in exchange for services such as uniforms, paid leave, training, and benefits. While management of proprietary security teams often fosters a strong sense of solidarity among employees and opportunities for advancement, it also poses challenges when it becomes necessary to terminate or replace staff, leading to potential disruptions within the organization. Contract security provides a more streamlined solution to address staffing issues swiftly when needed.
Furthermore, organizations that opt for proprietary security assume the responsibility of conducting background checks and ensuring that candidates possess the necessary training, credentials, and qualifications for their roles. In contrast, when partnering with a contract security firm, these concerns are shifted to the service provider. The contract security company takes full accountability for their officers' actions and enforces disciplinary measures when warranted.
Proprietary security offers a range of advantages for organizations. Firstly, it affords complete control over security policies and enforcement. Organizations can establish and enforce their rules and regulations for security personnel without external interference. Additionally, organizations have the liberty to stagger payments to security personnel as the business expands, mitigating the burden of a substantial upfront cost. Hiring proprietary security personnel enables organizations to thoroughly vet candidates, ensuring they align with the organization's values and requirements. This selection process allows for personalized interviews and tailored questioning to assess candidates adequately. Furthermore, proprietary security personnel can be compensated competitively, reducing turnover rates and maintaining consistency in the organization's security operations.
However, proprietary security also comes with its share of disadvantages. Notably, organizations must allocate resources for additional training, as security personnel must meet specific training and certification requirements mandated by law. Moreover, organizations must carefully schedule security personnel to ensure adequate coverage during critical periods. The presence of armed security personnel introduces additional complexities, such as the need for weapons training, which demands further investment. Importantly, in the event of downsizing or budget cuts, proprietary security may be subject to reduction or elimination.
Contract security offers its own set of advantages. One of the key benefits is cost predictability. Once the bidding process is complete, organizations pay the contract security provider a predetermined amount, eliminating unexpected expenses. Contract security arrangements allow organizations to specify the required training and qualifications within the service contract, ensuring compliance with standards. Contract security firms maintain a trained pool of security personnel, guaranteeing that there is always someone available to fulfill security duties. Moreover, organizations are relieved of the burden of providing additional benefits or insurance to security personnel, further simplifying the cost structure.
Nonetheless, contract security also comes with certain disadvantages. Organizations have limited control over security policies and the work of contract security personnel. They must trust that the contracted security personnel align with their organization's values and objectives. Additionally, contract security employees, while dedicated to their client organization, may not always act in the organization's best interests if it conflicts with their employer's priorities. Lastly, organizations might experience a sense of detachment or lack of control when relying on contract security services, as they might question whose interests the security personnel truly represent.
The decision between proprietary and contract security hinges on various factors, and there is no one-size-fits-all answer. Organizations must meticulously assess the advantages and disadvantages to determine which option aligns best with their unique needs and requirements. To make an informed choice, it is crucial to consider what is being protected, the organization's budget constraints, management preferences, and risk tolerance. Ultimately, the decision should serve the organization's overarching objectives while maintaining the safety and security of its assets.
The choice between proprietary and contract security is a multifaceted decision that requires a comprehensive evaluation of an organization's priorities and resources. Each option presents distinct advantages and disadvantages, and the ideal choice depends on the organization's specific circumstances. Whether opting for proprietary security with enhanced control or contract security with streamlined costs, organizations must make a deliberate choice to safeguard their assets effectively while aligning with their overarching goals. By weighing the pros and cons and understanding the implications of each option, organizations can navigate this critical decision-making process and enhance their security posture.
Exploring Security Choices: Proprietary vs. Contract Security. (2017, Jan 10). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/proprietary-versus-contract-security-guard-essay
👋 Hi! I’m your smart assistant Amy!
Don’t know where to start? Type your requirements and I’ll connect you to an academic expert within 3 minutes.
get help with your assignment
