We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you’re on board with our cookie policy

Check Writers' Offers

What's Your Topic?

Hire a Professional Writer Now

The input space is limited by 250 symbols

What's Your Deadline?

Choose 3 Hours or More.
2/4 steps

How Many Pages?

3/4 steps

Sign Up and Get Writers' Offers

"You must agree to out terms of services and privacy policy"
Get Offer

Precis Global Warming

Paper type: Essay
Pages: 4 (853 words)
Categories: Global Warming, War
Downloads: 30
Views: 27

Human contribution of Carbon Dioxide is not a cause of Global Warming. In fact there is no evidence that humans’ contribution of Carbon Dioxide could lead to a global climate change, instead, this changes in temperature can be easily explained by the natural changes that occur in the sun. People who know about this fact choose not to speak out. Timothy Ball’s purpose is to demonstrate that Global Warming is not a fact but a contradictory and flawed theory as it lacks of solid evidence.

He does this to defend himself against accusations made by environmentalists like David Suzuki who have said that Ball was being paid by oil companies to deny a fact. The author uses an allusion to the tale by Hans Christian Andersen, The Emperor’s New Clothes, to illustrate that people tend to believe everything they are told. He also uses some rhetorical questions like the following one “What would happen if tomorrow we were told that, after all, the Earth is flat? ” to imply that we believe without questioning if it is true or not.

Timothy Ball also mentions that we are lost as individuals and as a society to support his argument of people not daring to pursue the true and he also calls Global Warming the biggest deception in the history of science. He provides the article with many examples about how Global Warming is a waste of time and money, and he makes reference to Vice President Yuri A. Izrael, scientist Michael Crichton and Richard Lindzen. When introducing physicist Lindzen, Ball uses the allusion “another cry in the wilderness” referring to John the Baptist to imply that Lindzen is another individual fighting his way towards the truth.

The author also makes a hyperbolic allegory to the holocaust; “(… ) being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. ” to illustrate the harsh consequences of a having a belief and of pursuing the truth. He does this because as he mentions before in his article, he has been oppressed by governments, scientists and many other people and has feared of reprisals and job security just for the fact that he has spoken.

In conclusion, with this article Bell defends his position concerning global warming against accusations made by environmentalists; he exposes and supports his point of view with evidence and he challenges people to make a change within this society. The tone of this article is serious yet satiric as author Timothy Ball makes fun of how people believe in everything they are told, challenging them to question their selves and to dare to think different, and he also makes fun of a consensus being reached way before the investigation began.

There is no consensus despite what Al Gore says about global warming. Al Gore’s movie is mostly a fictional movie used for propaganda. There is evidence that explains that the changes in Earth temperature are caused by changes in the sun, a phenomenon that has been observed before, therefore Global Warming is not realistic. The purpose of this article is to argue against Al Gore’s film An Inconvenient Truth, in which Vice President talks about humans being responsible for global warming.

The author, Tom Harris, does this to support his skeptic point of view concerning global warming. To demonstrate his position, he begins by quoting a phrase from Al Gore’s film; “Scientists have an independent obligation to respect and present the truth as they see it,” and then Harris continues by asking the ironic question “With that outlook mind, what do world climate experts actually think about the science of his movie?

In which he implies that the so called by him dramatic film lacks of real science and that real scientists do not actually believe in Global Warming and its consequences. With this being said, he continues to name some of the scientists who support his belief and who according him are real scientists that really understand nature. Later on, he uses an irony “Here is a sample of the side of debate we almost never hear” to provide evidence about the main subject of exhaustive argument, C02 levels and earth’s temperature.

He again talks about the solid evidence presented by different individuals and all the criticism they have made against the misleading film by Al Gore, An Inconvenient Truth, where he uses the expression “Carter does not pull his punches about Gore’s activism” to show the striking amount of evidence against Al Gore. Harris finally closes by ironically saying that what is at stake is the end of civilization or a waste of billions of dollars in which he really implies that what is at stake is nothing or a waste of billions of dollars.

In conclusion, this article argues against evidence exposed by Al Gore and makes fun of Al Gore’s scientists. The tone of the article is satirical as the author, Tom Harris, uses a large amount of ironic commentaries to demonstrate that Al Gore’s movie is pathetic and misleading. He also points out that is our choice whether to believe in Global Warming or not.

Cite this essay

Precis Global Warming. (2020, Jun 02). Retrieved from https://studymoose.com/precis-global-warming-8742-new-essay

How to Avoid Plagiarism
  • Use multiple resourses when assembling your essay
  • Use Plagiarism Checker to double check your essay
  • Get help from professional writers when not sure you can do it yourself
  • Do not copy and paste free to download essays
Get plagiarism free essay

Not Finding What You Need?

Search for essay samples now


Your Answer is very helpful for Us
Thank you a lot!